[Greek] σχίσμα (schisma), [Latin] scissura, [Latin] scisma, [Latin] dissensio, [Latin] secta: split, division, tear, gap, division; Mt.9:16, Mk.2:21, Jn.7:43, Jn.9:16, Jn.10:19, 1Cor.1:10, 1Cor.11:18, 1Cor.12:25

The SSPX, seeking to make more consecrations, is now being called schismatic. Let that sink in!

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means division of opinion, leaving aside, split, division, shattering, separation, and fraction.

Herodotus’ The Histories 2.17: “We leave the Ionians’ opinion aside, and our own judgment about the matter is this: Egypt is all that country which is inhabited by Egyptians.”

Aeschylus’ Agamemnon 623: “It is not easy to conceal when true and good are split apart.”

Herodotus’ The Histories 7.219: “The Hellenes then took counsel, but their opinions were divided.”

Old Testament: This term means split, cleaving, division, break, tear, and a calling out.

New Testament: This term means tear and division.

Mt.9:16: “No one patches an old cloak with a piece of un-shrunken cloth, for its fullness pulls away from the cloak and the tear gets worse.” (This parable speaks of the unsuitability of attempting to combine the old and the new. Jesus’ teaching is not a patching up of Judaism, nor can the gospel be contained within the limits of the Mosaic Law. Jesus seeks to fulfill the Old Testament.)

Jn.7:43: “So a division occurred in the crowd because of Him.” (Some thought that Jesus was the Messiah, a Prophet, a blasphemer, or a criminal.)

Jn. 9:16: “So some of the Pharisees said, ‘This man is not from God, because He does not keep the Sabbath.’ Others said, ‘How can a sinful man do such signs?’ And there was division among them.” (Jesus’ words had confused and angered the Jews. Jesus healed a blind man on the sabbath. The Pharisees saw Jesus as a sinful man [not from God] who would break the sabbath law by performing this healing. The Pharisees even questioned if the man was originally blind.)

Jn.10:19: “Again there was a division among the Jews because of these words.” (The Jews were disturbed by Jesus’ words in referring to God as His Father and laying down His life for His sheep. Some could not accept His teaching and walked away. Some said that Jesus was blasphemous or possessed.)

1Cor.11:18: “First of all, I hear that when you meet as a church there are divisions among you, and to a degree I believe it.” (Paul speaks to a spirit of discord and divisiveness in the Church. These pertain to different loyalties to ministers (Paul, Apollos or Peter), cliques/quarrels, and how the Lord’s Supper is celebrated.)

Archbishop Lefebvre vs. Vatican II (and Pope Paul VI):

Why did Archbishop Lefebvre form the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) in 1970? He sought to preserve the traditional Catholic faith, doctrine, and liturgy in response to the dangerous liberalizing changes following Vatican II.

Why did Archbishop Lefebvre consecrate his bishops? To maintain apostolic succession and the continuity of the Church’s leadership and traditional teachings.

What happened to the SSPX afterwards? This society expanded its network of priests, seminaries, and faithful worldwide in the decades to come. The SSPX were ultimately never deemed to be schismatic. The actions taken against the SSPX speak more about Vatican II’s proponents’ liberal and progressive ideology.

2026: the SSPX vs. Vatican II (and Pope Leo): why the SSPX are seeking to make new consecrations?

1. One must have obedience to the pope, but the pope cannot become a despot with power.
2. It is lawful to resist the Pontiff who attacks souls, destroys civil order, or tries to destroy the Church.
3. The SSPX’s action is a legitimate act of self-defense.
4. The SSPX is exercising a higher power of obedience to the Magisterium.
5. The SSPX must follow what has been handed down from the bishops.
6. If a contemporary command contradicts the Church’s ancient teaching, it loses authority.
7. Preservation of the TLM is at stake.
8. This action is not of schismatic rebellion.
9. This is supported by the 1983 Code of Canon Law Canon 1323.

The SSPX’s final theological answer against the Vatican II and Pope Leo:

1. The SSPX are being excommunicated by Pope Leo who welcomed the woman Archbishop of Canterbury, who authorized the blessing of Fiduica Supplicans and who kneed before Pachamama.
2. These are some serious “theological shots thrown” against the Vatican II and Pope Leo

Etymology:

1. The Latin noun schisma means split, separation, and schism.
2. The Latin noun scissura means tearing and split
3. The Latin noun dissensio means disagreement, dissension, and rift
4. From past history, scissor mean tailor, carver, and cutter.
5. “Oh scissors” was a 19th  century exclamation of impatience and disgust.

Conclusion:

Sect, dissension, dissent, scissors, schism, schismatic

Update: There are in fact over 45,000 Churches and denominations that exist in the world.

The old torn cloth relates to pouring new wine in an old wineskin. Since the old wineskin cannot further expand any more (due to fermentation), it will burst. The Old cannot contain the new. Jesus’ teachings surpass the Old Covenant.

Different interpretations of Jesus:

1. Some see an historical Jesus from the scripture: Jesus associated with sinners, but did not tolerate sinful behavior. Jn.8:11: Sin no more. Jn.8:12: whoever sins walks in darkness
2. Some see a tolerant Jesus “who gets us”: we must show tolerance, inclusion, and mercy to others. Let’s not stigmatize sinful behavior and let’s not pay too much attention about sin. Church’s teachings are so rigid.

Divisions within the Church:

1. Traditional Latin Mass (and Traditional Catholic teachings) vs. Novus Order Mass (and Synodality)
2. Implementing Traditiones Custodes vs. the laity’s wish for the TLM (Do the laity’s needs and desires actually matter anymore?)
3. So many “extra-ordinary” Eucharistic ministers, whether or not to have kneelers and receiving the Eucharist on the tongue.
4. Traditional Church teachings against homosexuality vs. outreach” of inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion for the LGBTQ community 
5. Traditional understanding of vocations vs. Synodal consideration of woman priests and women priests
6. What should be the primary mission of the Church? BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN vs. MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD
7. “Outside the Church there is no salvation” vs. accommodating and seeking unity with other faiths OUTSIDE the Catholic Church (synodal ecumenism)
8. Maintaining traditional Church ecclesiological authority vs. synodal sharing of clergy and laity sharing decision making authority
9. Appointing orthodox (non-scandalous and non-heretical) clergy vs appointing scandalous and pro-LGBTQ clergy
10. Traditional Catholic teachings on Mary vs. the Synodal downplaying of Mary’s status (in order to accommodate Non-Catholics)
11. Whether or not to insert cultural influences and pagan idols in the Mass
12. Should the Church focus itself only in spiritual issues vs. focus on immigration, social justice, environment, and politics
13. Whether or not Vatican II Church leadership will do anything to discourage the large percentage of homosexuality in the priesthood.

Some traditionally minded clergy (Bishop Strick, Bishop Schneider, Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Mueller, Bishop Eleganti) are often not surprisingly seen as “divisive” according the Synodal Church.

There continues to be divisive views about the purpose of ICE (arresting Illegals and criminals) and sanctuary cities policies (allowing illegals and criminals to remain in the cities).

“There is nothing more serious than the sacrilege of schism because there is not just cause for severing the unity of the Church.” St. Augustine

“It is impossible to restore peace if the cause of the schism is not previously removed, and the Pope, who is declared to be equal to Go, does not come to self-realization.” St. Mark of Ephesus

“The world and the world to come are two enemies. We cannot therefore be friends to both; but we must decide which we will forsake and which we will enjoy.” Pope Clement I

[Greek] πίπτω (piptō), [Latin] incidere, [Latin] concidere, [Latin] decider, [Latin] perire, [Latin] prostrare, [German] fallen, [French] ruiner: to fall, to fall prostrate, to kneel, to fall down; 92 scriptural references

The Blind leading the blind: painting by Peter Bruegel the Elder (1568) The group’s leader has already fallen on his back into a ditch. A Synodal study group suggests that homosexuality is NOT sinful! Synodality: the blind leading the blind into a pit of heresy.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to fall, to fall down, to perish, to fail, to fall under (be counted as), and to throw oneself.

Euripides’ Hecuba 787: “But hear my reason for throwing myself at your knees.”

Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes 794: “The boasts of the powerful men have fallen to the ground.”

Sophocles’ Ajax 828: “Send on my behalf some messenger with news of my downfall to Teucer.”

Sophocles’ Electra 42: “Now, I beg you by our ancestral gods, obey me, and do not fall in your senselessness.”

Old Testament: This term, used extensively, has many meanings. Such uses include falling, lying down, being allotted, dying, falling prostrate, neglecting, giving birth, attacking, ceasing, oppressing, ruining, being inferior, settling, losing confidence, and being infertile.

Falling into rebellion and sin:

Deut.6:13-14: God warns of worshiping or bowing down to other gods.*

Num.25:1-9: Some Israelites prostituting themselves with Moabite women. They ate sacrifices offered to the god of Baal.**

Num.11:4, 34: The Israelites being dissatisfied in what God has given you [manna].***

Exo.32:6: The Israelites sacrificed burnt offerings and sat down to eat, drink, and to revel.****

Num.21:5-9: The Israelites were complaining to Moses about why were they still in Egypt.*****

Num.14:2-37, Num.16:1-35: All of the Israelites grumbled against Moses and Aaron. Some Israelites led a rebellion against Moses and Aaron.******

New Testament: This term, used both literally and figuratively, means to fall, to fall down, to be come guilty, to cease, to sin, to being defeated, to collapse, to overturn, and to be slain. I will focus on the negative and harmful aspects of this term.

Mt.4:9: “The devil said to Him, ‘All these I shall give to you, if you will prostrate Yourself and worship me.'” (The devil is the ruler (prince) of the world. [Jn.12:31] The devil wanted Jesus to show him allegiance to the kingdoms of the world [and their magnificence]. Jesus states that one only must worship and serve God alone.)*

Mt.15:14: “Let them alone; they are blind guides of the blind. If a blind person leads a blind person, both will fall into a pit.”

HUMAN Traditions of the Elders:

1. The Pharisees and scribes ask why Jesus’ disciples do not wash their hands when they eat a meal.
2. Jesus asks the Pharisees and scribes why to they break [nullify] God’s commandments for the sake of their human traditions.
3. Isa.29:13: this people honor me with their lips but their hearts are far from Me. They teach human doctrines.
4. Jesus states that what comes out of the heart and mouth is what defiles.
5. The Pharisees and scribes were offended by what Jesus said.
6. From the heart comes evil thoughts, immorality, adultery, unchastity, theft, false witness and blasphemy.

Mt.21:44: “The one who falls on this stone [Jesus Christ] will be dashed to pieces; and it will crush anyone on whom it falls.”

The one who falls on this stone: This suggests an encounter with Christ which leads to a humbling or breaking of one’s pride and self-reliance. This is a call of repentance and acknowledgement of Jesus as Messiah.

The one who is crushed by this stone: This is one who ultimately rejects Christ and opposes God’s plan of salvation through Christ. This is one who experiences divine judgment, and complete destruction.

Lk.16:17: “It is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid.” (Even the smallest part [detail] of God’s law is significant, unchanging, and divinely inspired. This is more lasting than the physical heavens and earth.)

Jn.12:24: “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it produces much fruit.”

A fallen grain producing life:

1. When Jesus states, “Amen, amen, I say to you..”, Jesus will begin to state an important and profound truth.
2. This metaphor foreshadows Jesus’ own death and burial, which was necessary for the greater purpose of salvation of humanity.
3. The scripture that immediately follows states that one must lose one’s life [die to oneself] in order to save oneself to have eternal life. This is one who follows Jesus.
4. In God’s providence, He may permit one to experience struggles as a means to bring one closer to God or to strengthen one’s relationship with God.
5. In some situations, one perhaps may be called to share in Jesus’ sufferings and struggles. (Redemptive suffering)

Acts 5:5: “When Ananias heard these words [‘You have lied not human beings, but to God’], he fell down and breathed his last breath” (Ananias’ sin was in his deception of the community. Satan had filled Ananias’ heart so that he lied to the Holy Spirit. Lying to the Holy Spirit is a grave act.)

1Cor.10:8: “Let us not indulge in immorality as some of them did, and twenty thousand fell within a single day.”**

1Cor.10:6: The Israelites desired evil things (sin, immorality, idolatry).***

1Cor.10:7: Do not become idolators as some of the Israelites did. ****

1Cor. 10:9: Let us not test Christ, as some of the Israelites did and later suffered death by serpents.*****

1Cor.10:10: Do not grumble as some of the Israelites did and suffered death by the destroyer.******

[Greek] ἐμπίπτω (empiptō), [Latin] incidere, [German] fallen, [French] tomber

1Tim 6:9: “Those who want to be rich are falling into temptation and into a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge them into ruin and destruction.” (The love of money is the root of all evils. In their desire for it, some people have strayed from their faith. Material gain should not be at the forefront of desires.)

More HUMAN TRADITIONS: Guiding principles of Modernist and Synodalist thinking:

1. Agnosticism: human reason is confined and reduced entirely within the person’s perceptions and senses
2. Vital Immanence: man finds within himself (sentiment, perceptions, and lived experiences) for an explanation for God, religious, faith, and doctrine. External objective supernatural objective and moral realities are excluded or diminished.
3. Modernism: this belief system is a starting point for all heresies: Modernism ==> heresies [fill in the blank] ==> atheism  (This idea comes from Pope Pius X.)
4. Synodality: LIVED EXPERIENCES (“A listening Church”, “Giving the people of God a greater voice”, Synodal study groups) can often TAKE PRECEDENCE over Church teachings. ==> SYNODALITY BECOMES AN IDOL!
5. A Church more focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than on BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN. The Church looks more like a United Nations NGO rather than the divine Church established by Jesus.
6. A Church who has lost the plot on what it means to become temporary earthly sojourners and citizens of heaven. (1Pet.2:11, Php.3:20, Eph.2:19) (Rather than focusing on spiritual issues,  the Church focuses on politics, environment, immigration, inclusion, tolerance, and accommodation to the culture.)
7. A Synodal study group suggesting that homosexual relationships may not be sinful (Making homosexuality OK in the Church)
8. A Synodal study group calling upon the laity to play a part in selecting bishops. (Further blurring the distinctions between the clergy and laity)
9. Synod of Synodalities: Synodal advocates are immorally appropriating the “Holy Spirit of Surprises” to ratify and justify their Synodal human traditions and novelties.

Conclusion:

Incident, incidental, coincide, coincidence, decide, prostrate, fall, fallen, ruin, tomb, peril, perish

Update: Many of us had perhaps fallen for the idea that Pope Leo would be different from Pope Francis. But No. Pope Leo is unfortunately following the Synodal path of Pope Francis.

We are continually seeing that the Synodal Church is continually bowing down to accommodating the LGBTQ community’s influence by becoming more tolerant and inclusive about homosexuality.

The Synodal study group now suggest that homosexual relationships may not be sinful. We are now having clergy and LAITY determining what is sinful. These are the consequences of having a “listening Church”. A Synodal Church bowing down to the world’s values.

Since Vatican II, the Church continues to fall into pit of worldliness and the “smoke of Satan” (spirit of undermining).

The Synodal Church and Synodal study groups: opening the door to more HUMAN TRADTIONS, worldliness and more “smoke of Satan” ===> the blind leading the blind into a pit of heresy.

Falling into hypocrisy: the traditional SSPX making more consecrations is schismatic, yet homosexuality is fine with the Church.

Easier to denounce tolerance and inclusion for homosexuality than to change the Church’s eternal teachings against homosexuality:

1. Modernists and Synodalists will continue to try to de-stigmatize, to ignore, and to white wash this sinful activity.
2. Pro-LBGTQ clergy and laity are also actively seeking to normalize and celebrate this sinful activity.
3. Not surprisingly we have a MAJOR DIVISION IN THE CHURCH concerning homosexuality (and other issues.)
4. Tradition: homosexuality is sinful. We need to uphold Church teachings.
5. Synodality: the Church must now be more inclusive and tolerant toward the LGBTQ community’s lifestyles

Placing the harmful consequences and failures of Vatican II and Synodality under a “microscope” is producing good fruits for the truth for the faithful.

1. More and more people are understanding that both Vatican II and Synodality have been the causes of problems, confusion, division, and heresies in the Church.
2. More and more people are now seeking doctrinal (moral) clarity and Tradition in the Church.
3. In response against Vatican II and Synodality, there has been an organic Holy-Spirit inspired movement (longing) back to Tradition.
4. The younger generations (laity and clergy) are becoming more conservative and Traditionally minded. This in part a back-lash against the more liberal and progressive older generations.
5. More and more people are seeing the harmful consequences of having a Church adapting to the world and culture. More are seeking a Church SEPARATE FROM THE WORLD.

Taking advantage of the Holy Spirit’s name for Synodal purposes is deceitful, serious, and evil. The Holy Spirit can only stand for Truth! Look what happened to Ananias! One wonders if the “Holy Spirit of Surprises” was at work when the Synodal study group suggested that homosexual activity is not sinful???

Many of us already are acting like little pagans bowing down to our electronic devices.

Many of us already worship and adore idols such as money, wealth, fame, likes, prestige, and career.

There are probably more people than we realize who have actually “sold their soul” to the devil in partaking of the riches and desires of this world.

Satan can also influence us by desire, sin, indulgence, distraction, spiritual dryness, and MAKING US FORGET ABOUT GOD.

Synodality: lived experiences, tolerance, inclusion, and false compassion often TAKE PRECEDENCE over Church doctrine, teachings, and scripture. This is how Synodality becomes an IDOL!

The Israelites were ultimately punished by God for their immorality, worshipping idols, sacrificing to idols, reveling, impatience, and grumbling. How would this be any different for Catholics, Christians, and non-Catholics in our current time?

“If you dig a pit for others to fall into, you will fall into it yourself.” Rumi

“Each man, in his suffering, can also be a sharer in the redemptive suffering of Christ.” St. Pope John Paul II

“You will never be happy if your happiness depends on getting what you want. Will what God wants and your joy no man shall take from you.” Archbishop Sheen

“Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ.” St. Athanasius.

“The greater your sufferings, the greater God’s love for you.” St. Padre Pio

[Greek] ἐξαπατάω (exapataō): [Latin] seducere, [French] separer: to deceive, to seduce; Rom.7:11, Rom.16:18, 1Cor.3:18, 2Cor. 11:3, 2Thess.2:3

Satan will NOT always be obvious because he will use more subtle means on others. CORRUPTION OF MINDS IS SATANIC ACTIVITY!

1. Satan will seek to make one dilute, to weaken, ignore or even undermine Church teachings, God’s institutions and scripture.
2. Satan will seek to make one de-stigmatize, white-wash, normalize, or even celebrate sin.
3. Satan will seek to make one make you forget about God.

“It is the masterstroke of Satan to get Catholics to disobey the whole of tradition in the name of obedience.” Archbishop Lefebvre

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to deceive, to trick, to cheat, to be fallacious, to be mistaken

Plato’s Gorgias 499c: “And yet I started with the notion that I should not have to fear any intentional deception on your part. But now I find I was mistaken.”

Plato’s Cratylus 413d: “Perhaps I may deceive you into thinking that all I am going to say is my own.”

Polybius’ Histories 2.56.12: “The power of carrying an audience is the chief excellence, because the object is to create illusion.”

Sophocles’ Antigone 617: “The deception comes to one who is wholly unaware until he burns his foot on a hot fire.”

Greek mythology:

1. Apate is the Greek goddess of deceit, fraud, and trickery.
2. Fraus is the Roman goddess of deceit, fraud, and trickery.
3. Idol worshippers would ordinarily kiss the idols in their presence.
4. When an idol was unavailable or unreachable, one would kiss his hand and wave it toward the idol.

Old Testament: This term means to deceive, to entice, to be tempted (into idolatry), and to tempt.

New Testament: This term means to deceive, to delude, and to trick.

Rom.16:18: “For such people do not serve our Lord Christ but their own appetites, and by fair and flattering speech they deceive the hearts of the innocent.” (Paul warns others to avoid those who create dissensions and obstacles to the faith. These people seek their own agenda. Paul warns others to be aware of what is good and evil.)

1Cor.3:18: “Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you considers himself wise in this age, let him become a fool so as to become wise.” (This wisdom of this world is foolish in the eyes of God. This is a warning against self-deception. Paul often challenged the Corinthians’ so called worldly wisdom. Becoming fools means rejecting pride and self-reliance and seeking true wisdom.)

2Cor.11:3: “But I am afraid that, as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts may be corrupted from a sincere and pure commitment to Christ.” (Before Christ returns, Paul rightly fears a repetition of the primal drama a seduction. CORRUPTION OF MINDS IS SATANIC ACTIVITY. Adam is also culpable in failing to help Eve.)

Satanic activity ===> corruption of minds:

1. Eve being deceived by the serpent. Adam failing to help and protect Eve.
2. False and deceitful apostles, ministers, and deceitful workers who masquerade as apostles of Christ.
3. Their end will correspond to their deeds, ideology, and agenda.
4. Those who enslave you, who devours you, or who gets the better of you, who puts on airs.

[Greek] ἀπάτη (apatē), [Latin] deceptio, [Latin] seductio, [Latin] fallacia, [Latin] error: deception, delusion, deceit, enticement, illusion

Eph.5:6: “Let no one deceive you with empty arguments, for because of these things the wrath of God is coming upon the disobedient. (These sons of disobedience follow the values of the world (immorality, desires of the flesh, sin, impurity, idols, human traditions, novelties, paganism). Satan is the prince (ruler) of this world.)

What does Satan seek to accomplish?

1. Satan seeks to deceive, destroy, and undermine the Church, Church teachings, social precepts (morals), social institutions, and people.
2. Satan is all in for creating and fostering divisions, heresies, schism, confusion, and affirming and encouraging sin in the Church. (One can only imagine Satan grinning and giving a big “thumbs-up”. This is how Satan undermines the Church.
3. [Paul]: WHERE THERE IS EVIL IN THE CHURCH, THERE IS THE DEVIL!
4. One does NOT need to be full-blown possessed to be influenced by the devil. Satan can subtly influence one through distraction, weakness, busyness, vulnerabilities, and FORGETING ABOUT GOD.
5. One must not forget that the world and worldly values are part of earthly domain of the devil. (Jn.12:31)
6. If homosexuality can be used to UNDERMINE traditional marriage, procreation, and priestly orders, Satan will happily encourage these efforts to undermine the Church.
7. If transgenderism and gender ideology can be used to UNDERMINE the traditional understanding of God’s plan for gender (male and female), Satan will happily encourage these efforts to undermine the Church.
8. Peter was briefly “Satanically inspired” when he tried to stop Jesus from carry out His mission to redeem humanity. Jesus told Peter that he was an obstacle. This was ultimately part of Satan’s plan to DISRUPT and UNDERMINE Jesus’ mission.
9. Gaslighting: you will be deemed intolerant, hateful, rigid, bigoted, homophobic, and discriminatory for opposing sinful behavior and upholding Church teachings. (Like living in an upside-down bizarro world where sin is OK!)

False compassion: Satan’s efforts in “inspiring” others can sometimes appear to be tolerant, accommodating, “merciful”, and compassionate

1. At first glance, Peter’s efforts to stop Jesus from dying seemingly sounded reasonable and “compassionate”. Peter cared for Jesus’ welfare.
2. The slippery slope of lived experiences, toleration, inclusion, ecumenism, pastoral care, accompaniment, and “mercy above all else”: lowering the bar for doctrinal standards and opening the door for allowing sin
3. De-stigmatizing, “white-washing”, or normalizing sinful behavior (because of the tolerance and inclusion in the culture): opening the door for allowing sin
4. The slippery slope of bestowing mercy, pastoral care, and accompaniment often gives license to dilute, weaken or ignore Church teachings (because of the culture).
5. False compassion: short-changing one’s ability to accept higher moral standards and placing one’s eternal soul in mortal peril. (allowing that person to sin)

Catholic psychiatrist Conrad Baars explains false compassion:

“A person in authority who deprives his subjects of the truth when he says, even with the best intention of helping them, ‘YOU MAY IGNORE THE TEACHINGS OF THE MAGISTERIUM: GOD’S LAWS ARE TOO HARD FOR YOU.’ By that he says in effect, ‘YOU ARE NOT AND NEVER WILL BE STRONG AND GOOD ENOUGH TO ADHERE TO THESE LAWS.”  

Confusing tolerance with intolerance:

1. Tolerance is not a Christian virtue. It is never an end in itself [Archbishop Chaput]
2. Tolerance applies only to persons, but never to principles. [Archbishop Sheen]
3. Intolerance applies only principles, but never to persons. [Archbishop Sheen]
4. TOLERANCE IS A VIRTUE OF A MAN WITH OUT CONVICTIONS. [GK Chesterton]
5. Our society’s obsession with tolerance leads to intolerance. [Charles Colson]
6. The Church is intolerant in principle because she believes. [Rev. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange]
7. The enemies of the Church are tolerant in principle because they do not believe. [Rev. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange]

Conclusion:

Seduce, seduction, separate, separation, deception, deceive, fallacy

Update: Synodal study groups: Both clergy and laity are both involved in deciding and formulating Church doctrine, teachings, and practices. You have a Church that becomes further and further influenced by the world’s values! Let that sink in.

This is how Satan wins by undermining the Church:

1. A Synod report suggests that homosexual relationships may NOT be sinful. This will eventually lead to recognizing same-sex unions. (Redefining sin and marriage)
2. Clergy who seek to promote LGBTQ ideology as merciful and pastoral. (De-stigmatize and normalizing sin and celebrating homosexuality).
3. Synod of Synodality: immorally appropriating the “Holy Spirit of Surprises” to justify and ratify novel Synodal teachings and practices. (This is deceitful and evil in that the Holy Spirit can only stand for Truth!)
4. A large percentage of clergy engaging in a homosexual lifestyle. (Undermining their sacred vow of celibacy)
5. Pro-LGBT clergy: “You do not need to follow Church teachings against homosexuality.” (This sounds like something the serpent in the garden would say.)
6. According to Cardinal McElroy, you are a hater if you oppose Fiducia Supplicans. (So you become a hater when you do not approve of sin (support Church teachings against sin.)
7. When you placate the German bishops who want formalized blessings of same-sex unions. Fiducia Supplicans allowing informal blessings on same-sex unions  ===> homosexuality NOT sinful ===>  formal blessings on same-sex unions ===> same-sex unions can be recognized as another marriage relationship (Incremental heresy).
8. Pope Leo’s left-wing political ideology is showing. Pope Leo’s greatest concern is “far-right ideology” but evidently not spiritual matters! (Labeling traditional and conservative Catholics as ===> right wing, backward looking, rigid and scandalous)
9. USCCB issuing a “gay friendly” bible: (De-stigmatizing, and “white-washing” sin because of inclusion, tolerance, and pastoral care.)
10. Vatican leadership welcoming and appointing scandalous clergy while expelling and excommunicating traditional (conservative) clergy. (Not a good look!)
11. Vatican II and Synodality more interested in MOVING WITH THE WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than in BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN.  (Satan is the ruler of prince of this world [Jn.12:31])
12. Vatican II leadership (Pope Leo) remains silent when scandal and sin appears. [Ex. LGBTQ Jubilee] (Silence ===> tacit acceptance)
13. More bizarro upside-down Synodal thinking: The Vatican’s doctrinal chief Cardinal Tucho claims it will be a grave schismatic act to allow more SSPX consecrations. (Consecrating more traditional clergy is offensive??? Yet homosexuality is fine. Let that sink in.)
14. Making the Church more worldly: (Synodal study groups are introducing the idea of the laity participating in the selection of bishops. Let that sink in.)

Corinthians’ so-called worldly wisdom ===> Modernists’ and Synodalists’ so-called worldly wisdom===>Synodality.  (Nothing changes!)

Archbishop Lefebvre was absolutely right: Tradition is now seen as rigid, backward looking, and scandalous. Let that sink in. (We seem to be living in an upside-down bizarro world in the Church.)

Jesus associated with sinners but He did NOT tolerate sin and sinful behavior. Jesus did NOT preach tolerance and inclusion [or scandalous behavior].

“We do not want a Church that will move with the world. We want a Church that will move the world.” GK Chesterton

“The devil is capable of confusing the most brilliant minds.” St. Padre Pio   (THIS JUST SHOWS HOW CUNNING AND DECEITFUL SATAN IS!)

“The underlying principle of all of Satan’s tactics is deception. He is a crafty and clever camouflager.” Billy Graham

May 13: Our Lady of Fatima

“More souls go to hell because of the sins of the flesh than for any other reason.”

[Greek] σκανδαλίζω (skandalizō), [Latin] offendere, [French] huerter, [French] indigner, [German] shockieren: to offend, to scandalize, to cause to sin, to stumble, to trip up, to trap; 45 scriptural references

Pope Leo continues his questionable ecumenical efforts in seeking unity of faith OUTSIDE the Catholic Church.

Background information:

Skandalon: A skandalon can be a dead-fall trap, snare, obstacle, and stumbling block.

Greek Hellenism: This term means to set traps, to cause to stumble, to give offense, to take offense, and to stumble.

Aristophanes’ Archarnians 687: “The accuser, desirous of conciliating the younger men, overrules us with his ready rhetoric; he drags us before the judge, presses us with questions, and lays verbal traps for us.”

Epictetus: “If someone succeeds in provoking you, realize that your mind is complicit in this provocation.”

Old Testament: This term means to stumble, to slip, to be trapped (in a spiritual context). The action of falling always takes on a more serious sense than the stumbling block. This action of falling results in a ruined relationship with God.

Spiritual harlotry:

1. This is an intercourse of the mixing of Old Testament values with worldly values, idolatry, paganism, and sin.
2. Abandoning the Lord for a foreign god was called prostitution or adultery.
3. Against God, the harlot prostitutes oneself with idolatry, paganism, and sin.
4. Interestingly, the related Greek word is porneia ===> pornography, porn!  Not a good look!

New Testament: This term means to cause one to sin, to take offense, and to fall away. No offense, but I will just mention some noteworthy scriptural examples. ☺☺☺

Causing one to sin:

Mt.18:6: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” (The gravity of this sin is so great that it would be better to have been drowned than to have committed this sin. A MILLSTONE MOMENT! See the very end of this post referencing Fiducia Supplicans)

To take offense:

Mt.11:6: “Blessed is the one who takes no offense at Me.” (Taking offense is becoming a stumbling block to Jesus and rejecting Jesus’ teachings and statements.)

Mt.15:12: “Then His disciples approached and said to Him, ‘Do you know that the Pharisees took offense when they heard what You said'”. (The Pharisees were scandalized about what Jesus said about their vain worship, empty hearts, and HUMAN TRADITIONS.)

Mt.17:27: “But that we may not offend them, go to the sea, drop in a hook, take the first fish that comes up. Open its mouth and you will find a coin worth twice the temple tax. Give that to them for Me and you.” (The Jews were obligated to pay the the temple to the authorities. Jesus tells His disciples to respect these customs. Jesus provides the means to pay this tax.)

Jn.6:61: “Since Jesus knew that His disciples were murmuring about this, He said to them, Does this shock you?'”

1. Jesus did NOT try to convince His disciples to come back by saying, “I was only speaking figuratively!”
2. The GREAT AND SAD IRONY is that the Jews were forbidden to drink the blood because of Jewish customs (the life is in the blood [Deut.12:23].
3. This Jewish restriction prohibited the Jew from partaking of the blood.
4. But partaking of Jesus’ Body and Blood gives us life everlasting!

Mk.6:3: “Is He not the carpenter, the son of Mary, and the brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? Are not His sisters here with us? And they took offense at Him.” (The Nazarenes could not see that a carpenter’s son could be a teacher, prophet, and Messiah. They could not accept Jesus coming from a position of humility.)

To fall away:

Mt.13:21: “But he [seed]: has no root and lasts only for a time. When some tribulation or persecution comes because of the word, he immediately falls away.” (This is the person whose week faith is not strong enough to endure when struggles, opposition, and persecution come.)

Mt.24:10: “And then many will be led into sin; they will betray and hate one another.” (This is one who falls away, becomes scandalized, or who becomes apostates.)

2Cor.11:29: “Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is lead to sin? and I am not indignant?” (As a sinner himself, Paul can empathize with the sinner. But he is also indignant at the one who sins.)

Who is led to sin:

1. Who is made to stumble and who causes others to stumble
2. Who becomes a stumbling block (to himself or to others)
3. Who is led astray or causes others to go astray
4. Who gives offense and scandalizes.

[Greek] σκάνδαλον (skandalon)

Mt.16:22-23: “Peter rebuked Jesus, ‘God forbid, Lord! No such thing shall ever happen to you.’ Jesus turned to Peter, ‘Get behind Me, Satan! You are an obstacle [scandal] to Me. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.'”

1. At first glance, Peter’s statement toward Jesus sounds reasonable: Peter, concerned for Jesus’ safety, does not want Jesus to die.
2. However, this statement is scandalous and evil. This statement seeks to DEFLECT and UNDERMINE Jesus’ mission from the Father.
3. Peter was briefly “inspired” from Satan. Peter has just made a satanic and evil statement.
4. Satan seeks to UNDERMINE Jesus’ mission to die on the cross to seek redemption for humanity.

Spiritual harlotry: idolatry, unchastity, prostitution, fornication, human traditions, unfaithfulness to God, turning aside from God

1. Vatican II had “intercourse” with the world (world’s values) ===> bringing in “fresh air” (worldliness) and the “smoke of Satan” (spirit of undermining) because the Church “needed to get with the times.”  ===> a pastoral and spiritual disaster for the Church
2. Synodality doubles down on what Vatican II did ===> more worldliness and more undermining
3. This “fresh air” and “smoke of Satan” involves human traditions, syncretism, and questionable ecumenism.

Scandalous “smoke of Satan” influences the culture (Church and world):

1. It is important to be reminded that Satan is the ruler (prince) of this world. (Jn.12:31)
2. Satan seeks to entice each of us with the world: fame, power, wealth, notoriety, likes, sin, indulgence, sin, distraction, busyness, FORGETTING ABOUT GOD.
3. Satan seeks to UNDERMINE God, Church doctrine and teachings, God’s plans for marriage and procreation.
4. Satan influenced Peter to have false compassion to seek to undermine Jesus’ mission to redeem humanity.
5. Lived experiences, tolerance, pro-LGBTQ clergy, inclusion, false compassion, and unity can be used to dilute, to ignore, to change, and to contradict Church teachings and scripture ===> can undermine God, Church teachings, and scripture
6. To push the “doctrinal envelope” because of unity, “discrimination” and “pastoral care”.  (Further undermining of doctrine and Church teachings)
7. Lived experiences, tolerance, inclusion, false compassion, “pastoral care”, and “unity” can be used to de-stigmatize, to ignore, to normalize, and to celebrate sin (Fiducia Supplicans) ===> undermine God, Church teachings, and scripture.
8. New “gay-friendly” USCCB bible: (Can you see how dangerous this can be? Pastoral care, inclusion, and tolerance are being be used to minimize, to “whitewash”, to de-stigmatize, and to normalize homosexuality [sin]. The LGBTQ community has become a very powerful influence on the Church. ===> LGBTQ “outreach”
9. As the emboldened German bishops continue to promote their homosexual agenda, Pope Leo, more interested in unity, offers only tepid disagreement and resistance.
10. Padre Pio: “The devil is capable of confusing the most brilliant mind.”

Literature:

1. The Catholic Douay-Rhims translation of the New Testament, published in 1582, caused quite a stir when it replaced the words “offend” and “stumbling block” with “scandalize” and “scandal.”
2. Despite initial criticism, this terminology was accepted in the European continent accustomed to scandals in many aspects of life.
3. Medieval and Renaissance writers, including Shakespeare, quickly adopted these terms.
4. Interestingly, Shakespeare’s play Hamlet makes references to mousetraps and scandals.

Conclusion:

Scandal, scandalize, indignant, shock, shocking hurt, offend, offensive

It is quite interesting that Epictetus already understood the notion of someone “living rent-free” in another person’s head. (Trump Derangement Syndrome perhaps?)

Jesus often speaks in purposely exaggerated terms (cutting off limbs and eyes) to illustrate the more serious consequences of sin.

Brothers and sisters: This term referred to cousins. There was not yet a word for cousin.

Update: It is unfortunately scandalous (but not surprising) that the Vatican continues to restrict the TLM and to remove altar rails in more and more churches.

LGBTQ Vatican Jubilee (2 scandalous decisions made by Pope Leo)===> 1. approving questionable Church events.  2. remaining silent

1. Pope Leo QUIETLY gave approval for this Jubilee for the LGBTQ community.
2. Not surprisingly, scandal and liturgical sacrilege immediately followed.
3. Other clergy offered reparations for this event. Pope Leo remained silent.
4. Evidently, it is not a good look for you to publicly criticize an event in which you had previously approved of. So you remain silent.
5. Why did Pope Leo do this? Was this done of out of “unity”? Or to not “rock the boat”? Or to accommodate the culture? SILENCE EQUALS TACIT ACCEPTANCE.

These can become stumbling blocks for some in the Church: actually following Church teachings, Jesus’ statements on sin, scripture, traditional Church teachings, TLM

It is also scandalous that too many Cardinals, bishops, and priests are still remaining silent about Church scandals because they are FEARFUL AND AFRAID OF OFFENDING their superiors, the Vatican, the laity, and the LGBQT community!

Vatican II: Pope Paul V worked with a commission of Protestant theologians to create the Novus Order Mass with the focus on a community meal (not a sacrifice.)

The Vatican (and Pope Leo XIV) continue to welcome and appoint scandalous clergy while at the same time potentially threaten the SSPX with excommunication. Let that sink in.

Bishop Batzing claims that MORE Synodality is the only thing that can save the Church?? This bishop is scandalously saying that the Church can only survive from a human initiative. You can’t make this up!

Bishop Martin of Charlotte has banned the use of altar rails and kneelers, despite the  laity’s canonical right to receive Holy Communion.

It was St. Peter Damian in the 11th century who had shed light on the scandal of homosexuality in the priesthood (promotion of this lifestyle, sexual abuse, silence, and covering up). Sound familiar? Yet we continue to have many priests living in a homosexual lifestyle.

The scandal in Germany: the German Synodal Church is “reforming” and “renewing” itself into decline and heresy.

It seems that Pope Leo, more interested in unity, offers tepid resistance to doctrinally controversial issues in and outside the Church.

The USCCB, doubling down on their immigration efforts, criticize the US government’s mass deportation efforts. Yet, the tone-deaf USCCB does not respect Catholic social teaching on foreigners respecting countries’ borders and their implicit culpability in funds being sent for illegal immigration, leftist causes, and child trafficking.

Quotes on scandal:

“It is better that scandals arise than the truth be suppressed.” Pope St. Gregory the Great

“We should even go beyond doing what is required in order to avoid scandal.” St. Basil

“Homosexual marriage is false, and a scandal.” Cardinal Robert Sarah

“The worst kind of heretic is the one who, while teaching mostly true Catholic doctrine, add a word of heresy, like a drop of poison in a cup of water.” Pope Leo XIII

“You are not to be looked upon as holding the true Catholic faith if you do not teach that the faith of Rome is to be held.” Pope Leo XIII

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/blessing-homosexual-couples-flings-the-door-open-to-the-demonic-exorcists-assistant-warns/?utm_source=twitterjhw

[Greek] πορνεία (porneia), [Latin] fornicatio, [Latin] prostitutio: unchastity, dishonoring, profaning, immorality, whoredom, idolatry; 26 scriptures

St. Peter Damian (1007-1072) already saw the problems with immorality, homosexual predatory behavior (grooming), laxity, moral relativity, and silence within the clergy. In recent times clergy now seek to DE-STIGMATIZE, MINIMIZE, NORMALIZE, or DOWNPLAY this sinful behavior. The laity is also NOT immune to this criticism.

Background information:

New Testament: This term means unlawful marriage, unchastity, homosexuality, and immorality. Immorality can include fornication, evil, harlotry, and licentiousness.

Scripture:

Unlawful marriage: Mt.5:32, Mt.19:9, Acts 21:25

1. Involves serious sexual sin, incest, adultery, and annulment grounds.
2. Marriages involving Mosaic law violations and sanctions.
3. Jesus’ admonitions apply only to valid marriages.
4. Paul asks Gentiles to abstain from unlawful marriages.

Immorality: Mt.15:19, Cor.5:1, 1Cor.6:13,18, 1Cor.7:2, 2Cor.12:21, Col.3:5, 1Thess.4:3

1. Evil thoughts and deeds, coming inside from the heart, defile the person.
2. There is a need for separation from the unholy.
3. Sexual satisfaction becomes as commonplace as food.
4. The immoral person sins against his own body.
5. One must have an understanding of one’s own limitations.
6. You [Corinth] have not repented of your impurity, immorality, and licentiousness.
7. Put away parts of you that are earthly (worldly).
8. God wills that you refrain from immorality.

Born of fornication: Jn.8:41

1. If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works of Abraham.
2. You are trying to kill me [Jesus] who has told you the truth.
3. You are doing the works of your “worldly” father [the devil].
4. Your father is the father of lies.
5. You do not belong to God (priests and laity prostituting themselves to other idols).

Prostitution in Corinth:

1. Corinth was considered the “Amsterdam of the ancient world”.
2. Aphrodite was the patron goddess of Corinth.
3. Women slaves, prostitutes, and courtesans were sold into prostitution.
4. [Paul]: any woman unveiled brings shame upon her.
5. Adulterous women’s hair was cut short (so others may see their shame).
6. Prostitutes and lesbians were thought to have to short hair.

Church in Pergamum: (Jesus hated the works of the Nicolaitans [Rev.2:6]) 

1. The Nicolaitans practiced a mixture of Christianity, paganism, and the occult (which becomes a mockery of their faith).
2. The Nicolaitans had a shallow “dumbed down” faith.
3. The Nicolaitans practiced eating of meat sacrificed to idols.
4. The Nicolaitans practiced free sexual intercourse.
5. The Nicolaitans followed the doctrine of the cult of Balaam (abortion).
6. The Nicolaitans valued tolerance and compromise.
7. The Modernists and Synodalists have essentially become the new Nicolatians. * see attached post below

The Harlot of Rome (Babylon):

1. The greatest seducer of nations and their kings.
2. The kings of the earth have syncretic “intercourse” with this harlot. (exchanging worldly values and sin with the Church).
3. This harlot is the center of paganism and apostasy from God.
4. This harlot mixed idolatry, lusts, religion, worldly ways, and philosophies
5. Babylon is filled with fornication and pleasures.
6. Babylon is contrasted with the pure community of God.

Rev.14:8: “Fallen, fallen is Babylon, the great that made all nations drink the wine of her licentious passion (fornication).” (This harlot seduces and intoxicates the nations (and leaders) with idolatry, paganism, superstition, worldly ways (human traditions), fornication, and lusts.)

Rev.17:2: “The kings of the earth have intercourse with her, and the inhabitants of the earth became drunk on the wine of her harlotry.” (The kings of the earth commit spiritual adultery with this harlot. The great harlot seduces them with unfaithfulness, idolatry, passions, and corruption.)

Homosexuality (fornication) in the Church:

Who was St. Peter Damian (1007-1072)? He was an Italian cardinal and Doctor of the Church. He had shed a spotlight on the sexual immorality, laxity, clerical homosexuality, and moral relativity among the clergy.

What does St. Peter Damian say about homosexuality in the clergy?

1. Homosexuality is incompatible with the dignity of the priest.
2. There is a correlation between liturgical abuse and an indifference to the moral demands of the gospel.
3. Fundamental disorientation regarding the natural complementarity of the sexes.
4. Devastating psychological and spiritual effects of homosexuality.
5. This can lead to a continuum of sins that depart from the nature of the sexual act.
6. The tendency to recruit others into their lifestyle.

Quotes by St. Peter Damian:

“Sodomy raging like a cruel beast within the sheepfold of Christ” (Peter Damian observed homosexuality rapidly spreading within the clergy.)

“Why do you seek after the height of ecclesiastical dignity with burning passion?” (Peter Damian observed self-seeking promotion of this deviant lifestyle within the clergy.)

“Undoubtedly, those who turn a blind eye to the sins of their subjects that they are obliged to correct.” (Peter Damian observed the secrecy, silence, and lax disclosure of homosexuality within the clergy.)

“If such a priest is barely permitted to enter the church pray, how is it that he can approach the altar to intercede for others” (Peter Damian states homosexuality is deeply related to the dignity of the priest.) Questionable behavior==> questionable priesthood

“What do you seek in a man, that you are unable to find yourself, you seek in vain in another body?” (Peter Damian sees that the priest has a disorientation about the natural complimentarity of the sexes.)

How did Pope Leo IX respond to homosexuality in the priesthood? He approved a canon decreeing excommunication for those guilty of sodomy.

Dr. Frederick Martel, author of In the Closet of the Vatican: Power, Homosexuality, Hypocrisy, surprising conclusions about the Vatican: *** 

1. The Vatican has one of the biggest gay communities in the world.
2. He discovered that he felt he had gone back in time seeking clergy living double lives.
3. Priests who didn’t recognize themselves as gay before living in Vatican City have “discovered” their homosexuality.
4. If you want to integrate with the Vatican, one must adhere to a code which consists of tolerating the priests’ and bishops’ homosexuality. Enjoy it if appropriate, but keep it secret.
5. Many of the Cardinals and priest share the same inclinations.
6. There are more and more homosexuals as one rises to through the Catholic hierarchy.
7. In the College of Cardinals, and at the Vatican, homosexuality becomes the rule, heterosexuality becomes the exception.

Pope Leo XIV affirms blessings for homosexual couples and downplays sexual sin.

1. “We tend to think that, when the Church is talking about morality, the only issue of morality is sexual. In reality there are much greater and more important [moral issues].” (Pope Leo seeks to downplay sexual sin and highlight that that there are more serious social issues concerns that the Church must address. Pope Leo is downplaying the consequences of Fiducia Supplicans.)
2. “To go beyond that, I think the topic can cause more disunity than unity, and that we should look for ways to build our unity upon Jesus Christ and what Jesus Christ teaches.” (It seems that Pope Leo does not want to “rock the boat” For the sake of unity, he does not want to address the blessing of same-sex unions head on. He wants others to focus on other issues.)
3. “We do not agree with the formalized blessing of homosexual couples or couples in irregular situations, beyond what was specifically allowed by Pope Francis.” (Pope Leo doesn’t agree with the German bishop’s to seek formalized, but has essentially supported and endorsed Fiducia Supplicans.)
4. “And that we should look for ways to build our unity upon Jesus and what Jesus Christ teaches.” (Yes, we are called to be unified in believing what Jesus taught. But Jesus others to sin no more. ‘Whoever follows me [by not sinning] will NOT walk in darkness. In other words, ‘whoever does NOT follow Me will walk in darkness.’ (Jn.8:11-12)
5. Pope Leo seems to be more concerned about unity and “rocking the boat” rather than addressing sinful activity or supporting Church teachings against homosexuality.
6. Bishop Athanasius Schneider correctly points out blessing same-sex couples is a great deception and evil. Same-sex union directly contradicts God’s divine plans for marriage. To bless or endorse this relationship is to bless evil.

Some noteworthy (but not all) scripture about sexual immorality:

1. Acts 15:29: abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols and from sexual immorality
2. Rom.1:24-25: God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity. They exchange the truth about God for a lie.
3. 1Cor.6:9: the sexually immoral, idolators, adulterers, who practice homosexuality
4. 1Cor.6:13-15: their sexual activity is as common as food for the stomach
5. Col.3:5: put to death what is earthly in you (sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, covetousness), which is idolatry

Conclusion:

Prostitution, prostitute, fornication, fornicate, porn, pornographic

Update: Fiducia Supplicans is a by-product of the Vatican’s acquiescence to pressure from the German bishops’ curious interest in homosexuality. Yet, the Vatican (and Pope Leo IXV will not rescind this document. Some have said that the Church has reached its “millstone moment.” That is NOT a good thing.

It can’t be stated enough that priestly homosexuality becomes a profound undermining of the priestly vow of celibacy. This is the ultimate act of disobedience of the priest. Satan would be proud. The dirty secret is that many clergy do not want to give up their homosexual lifestyles.

Synodality continues Vatican II’s efforts to have “spiritual intercourse” with worldliness, politics, paganism, secularism, lived experiences, inclusion, tolerance, false compassion, sin and ignoring sin.

Synodality (lived experiences) TAKE PRECEDENCE over Church teachings and scripture.  Synodality becomes an IDOL!

The Modernists and Synodalists sound very much like the Nicolaitans. Let that sink in.!

We continue to have progressive pro-LGBTQ clergy in the Church who continually seek to oppose or undermine traditional Church teachings against homosexuality. These clergy claim that the Church teachings are hateful and discriminatory to the LGBTQ community.

Fr. Heimerl: “Francis’ synodal church is controlled by old homosexual men” **

1. The synodal Church no longer teaches the traditional faith (about homosexuality).
2. The bishops’ failure (silence and cowardice) in criticizing the synodal Church indicates a “new normality.”
3. Where does this silence and indifference come from? From Satan, the father of lies (1Jn.3:8)
4. Fiducia Supplicans: permitting of blessings of “irregular couples” [homosexuals and adulterers]
5. The clergy has historically been infiltrated by homosexuals. Serious estimates: over 60%
6. There is little opposition because the Church has fallen into the hands of older homosexual men.
7. There is now a belief by some people that homosexuality is “willed by God and is by no mean a sin” (This is contrary to Church teachings and very concerning!)
8. The Church is in the Babylonian captivity of homosexual senior clergy.
9. Pope Francis is associating himself with these older homosexual clergy!
10. The workings of Satan has now been exposed [for all to see] in the Church. This is perhaps God’s providence in allowing for a true reform of clergy in the Church.

1Cor.6:12-20: these scriptures explicitly references the evil of sexual immorality. Yet, Pope Leo seeks to minimize this. Evidently, Pope Leo seems to be more concerned about unity rather than what the Church and the scriptures say. Let that sink in.

St. Peter Damian’s question remain relevant today: “IS IT TOO MUCH TO HOPE TO HAVE GOOD PRIESTS?”

“Someone who lived practicing the vice of sodomy will suffer more pains in hell than else, because this is the worst sin there is.” St. Bernadine of Siena

“There are many who are so steeped in vice that they never think of eternity and seek their happiness in sinful and worldly pleasures… Indecisive and lukewarm, they think that they can serve God and the devil at the same time. If people of this kind will not make up their minds, they are running the risk of eternal damnation.” Cardinal Bacci (1891-1971)

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fr-heimerl-francis-synodal-church-is-controlled-by-old-homosexual-men/ **

https://resoundingthefaith.com/2025/07/30/greek-%ce%bc%ce%b5%cf%84%ce%b1%cf%84%ce%af%ce%b8%ce%b7%ce%bc%ce%b9-metatithemi/   *

https://www.complicitclergy.com/2025/08/16/coming-out-in-the-vatican/ ***

https://www.ncregister.com/blog/new-jpii-institute-professors-question-church-orthodoxy-on-homosexuality-contraception ****

https://www.signofthecrossmedia.com/analysis/pope-leo-xiv-affirms-informal-blessing-for-homosexual-couples-and-downplays-sexual-sin/?utm_source=twittercath

[Greek] ἐντυγχάνω (entygchanō),[Latin] postulare, [Latin] petere, [French] reclamer, [French] demander, [French] ambitionner, [French] desirer, [French] perturber: to petition, to intercede, to plead, to make intercession; Acts 25:24, Rom.8:27,34, Rom.11:2, Heb.7:25

This is Mary, our Mother, who intercedes for all of us.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to meet with, to obtain an audience, to interview, to converse with, to appeal, to petition.

During the Old Testament era, the Queen, advocating for the people, makes a request to her son the king.

Old Testament: This term means to complain, to solicit, to petition, to pay, to meet, to approach someone with a request, to turn to God.

Queen Mother:

1. The Queen Mother held an official position of power in the royal court.
2. She shared in her son’s reign and served as an advocate for the people and counselor to her son.
3. A throne was provided for the Queen Mother at the right hand of  the king. (1Kgs.2:19)
4. Upon the Queen Mother’s entrance into the court, the king stood up and paid the Queen Mother homage. (1Kgs.2:19)
5. The Queen Mother, advocating for Abishag the Shunamite, asks for a favor from her son. The king will not refuse her request. (1Kgs.2:20)

Old Testament prophecy leading to Mary:

1. Eve, the proto-typical queen mother of the living, appears in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:15)
2. The young woman, pregnant and about to bear a son, shall name Him Emmanuel (Isa.7:14)
3. Mary will become the New Eve. Mary, full of grace, undoes what Eve did.
4. Mary becomes the new Ark of the Covenant, containing Jesus the High Priest, the Bread of Life, and the Word of God.

New Testament: This term means to petition, to intercede, and to plead.

Acts 25:24: “Festus, procurator of Judea, said, ‘King Agrippa and all of you look at this man [Paul] about whom the whole Jewish population petitioned me, clamoring that he should live no longer.” (They accused Paul for turning his back against the Jewish people and for becoming a Christian. They wanted the Roman authorities to arrest and condemn Paul. However, Paul claimed his rights as a Roman citizen.)

Rom.8:27: “And the one [God the Father] who searched hearts knows what is the intention of the Holy Spirit, because it intercedes for the holy ones according to God’s will.” (The Holy Spirit comes to the aid of our weaknesses, without the need of deep emotions or eloquent words. The Holy Spirit knows our hearts.)

Being led by the Spirit of God (Rom.8:14-27):

1. For those who are led by the Spirit of God are children of God.
2. If we are children and heirs of God, we also may suffer and be glorified with Christ.
3. The sufferings of this present time are as nothing compared to the glory to be revealed.
4. As we share in the penalty of corruption brought about by sin, so we shall share in the benefit of redemption and future glory.
5. For in hope we are saved.
6. The Spirit comes to aid of our weakness

Rom.11:2: “God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew. Do you not know what the scripture says about Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel?”

1. This scripture links the Israelites’ refusal to accept Jesus with Elijah pleading to God about Israel’s disobedience toward God.
2. Elijah points out to God about Israel’s idolatry, contempt against the worship of God, and the violent persecution of the faithful.
3. God remains faithful to Israel.
4. God provides a faithful remnant, chosen by grace, who have not knelt to Baal.

Mary as an intercessor:

1. The Wedding at Cana (Jn.2:12): Mary acting as an intermediary, notices that the wine has run out and requests help from Jesus. Mary tells others to follow Jesus’ instructions.
2. At the foot of the Cross (Jn.19:26-27): Jesus gives disciple (Church) His Mother. “Behold, your mother. Woman, behold your son.” Mary becomes our spiritual Mother.
3. We can pray to Mary to intercede for us in our petitions to Jesus. Mary leads us to her Son.
4. Marian apparitions: Mary warns us (the Church) through warnings and chastisements if we do not get our act together as a Church.
5. Rosary: Mary leads believers to Jesus by contemplating on the pivotable events of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection.

Mary as Co-Redemptrix: Mary participates in man’s redemption becoming the Mother of God. She will be the woman who crushes the head of the serpent

Mary as Mediatrix: Mary mediates our concerns and prayers to her Son. Mary leads us to her Son.

Why did the Vatican II document Mater Populi fidelis say about Mary? (very dubious and questionable attitudes toward Mary)

1. It does NOT become helpful when the titles ‘Co-redemptrix’ and ‘Mediatrix’ require repeated explanations? What??? How about just teach and catechize the people about Mary!
2. This document also seems to be MORE concerned about Protestants “concerns” about Mary. This is very questionable ecumenism!
3. This document intentionally fails to celebrate and even minimizes the status of Mary in the Church. This sounds very un-Catholic!

Theotokos:

1. This is a Greek title given to Mary.
2. This term means “God-bearer” or Mother of God.
3. Theotokos is predominately used in eastern Christianity.
4. The Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God is a feast day (holy day of obligation) celebrated by the Roman rite of the Catholic Church on January 1.

Conclusion:

Postulate, postulant, ambition, desire, desiring, derangement, derange, perturb, demand, reclaim, oration

Paul, as a Roman citizen, was entitled to be beheaded, an execution befitting to a Roman citizen. On the other hand, crucifixion was an execution befitting to non-Roman criminals.

Update Baal was worshipped as the god of weather, agriculture, fertility, sexual immorality, spiritual infidelity,

Spiritual harlotry (idolatry): having spiritual intercourse with idols and gods

Mary essentially becomes the first Christian (follower in Christ) by saying yes to the Holy Spirit.

It seems that the Vatican is more welcoming to the “woman” Archbishop of Canterbury than with the SSPX. One wonders if the Vatican will be on the verge of excommunicating the SSPX. Let that sink in!

Synodal immoral appropriation of the Holy Spirit: The Synod of Synodality leaders often using the “Holy Spirit of Surprises” as a means to ratify and rationalize their Synodal novelties into the Church. The Holy Spirit can only stand for Truth. This practice is misleading, deceitful and evil.

Rom.8:18: The sufferings of this present time are just a “drop in the bucket” compared to the salvation that awaits. This may provide some perspective and reassurance to those who currently struggle and suffer.

Many of us are now rightly criticizing the consequences of Vatican II and Synodality on the Church:

1. God is providing a faithful remnant upholding traditional Catholic teachings in the midst of this confusion, problems, and heresy.
2. The Holy Spirit is leading an organic movement back to Tradition and traditional practices.
3. The younger generations (clergy and laity) favor Tradition and tradition practices.
4. More and more Protestants are becoming Catholic. Many Protestants are now learning about the deep history of the Catholic Church.
5. The TLM is thriving (where allowed). The NOM continues to have sparse attendance. Shocker!
6. This organic movement toward Tradition CANNOT be stopped other than by the Church hierarchy implementing Traditiones Custodes.

Mary is considered to be at the right hand of Jesus in heaven as the Queen Mother (Queen of Heaven), sharing in His royal authority.

“The knot of Eve’s disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary; what the virgin Eve unbound by her unbelief, the Virgin Mary unbound by her faith.” St. Irenaeus

“When Jesus saw His mother and the disciple there, He said to His mother, ‘Woman, behold your son.’ Then He said to His disciple, ‘Behold your mother.'” Jn.19:26-27

This post was made as small token of my appreciation for Mary, the Mother of God.

Happy Mother’s Day!

[Greek] ἀντιλέγω (antilegō), [Latin] contradicere, [Latin] negare, [French] contester: to oppose, to dispute, to speak against, to deny, to contradict, to counteract; Lk.2:34, Lk.20:27, Jn.19:12, Acts 13:45, Acts 28:19,22, Rom.10:21, Tit.1:9, Tit.2:9

Outside the Church there is no salvation: Yet Vatican II and Synodality, engaging in questionable ecumenical efforts, continue to contradict this dogma.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to speak against, to contradict, to tell a tale in reply, and to dispute.

Euripides’ Hippolytus 993: “I shall begin to speak from the point where you first attacked me expecting you would destroy me with not a word to say in reply.”

Xenophon’s Memorabilia 4.6.13: “Whenever anyone argued with him on any point without being able to make himself clear, he would lead the whole discussion back to the definition required.

Aristophanes’ Lysistrata 806: “Well, I’ll relate a rival fable just to show you a different point of view.”

Old Testament: This term means to go back, to retreat, to apostatize, to contend, to backslide, to turn away, to make a complaint, to be adversarial, and to make a complaint.

Lk.2:34: “Simeon blessed them and said to Mary His mother, ‘Behold, this child is destined for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be contradicted.'” (Jesus will cause some to fall (stumble) and some to rise (be saved). This passage refers to Isaiah prophesying that the Messiah will be a snare and stumbling block for those who cannot accept Him. [Isa. 8:14] Jesus will be an object of contempt and rejection by many people.)

Lk.20:27: “Some Sadducees, those who deny that there is a resurrection, came forward and put a question to Him.” (The Sadducees accepted as scripture only the first five books of the Old Testament. They rejected the oral legal traditions, opposed the resurrection of the dead, and opposed to teachings not found in the Pentateuch.)

Lk.21:15: “For I myself shall give you a wisdom in speaking that all your adversaries will be powerless to refute and overcome objections.” (You will be given a means of speaking, expression, and utterance to respond back. The Holy Spirit will provide (teach) you wisdom at that moment to refute your adversary [Lk.12:11-12]) 

Acts 28:22: “But we should like to hear you present your views, for we know that this sect is denounced everywhere.” (As a Jew, the Romans were interested in hearing Paul’s views. The new Christians were perceived as a sect (heresy) being in opposition to the Jews. The Christians often had to hide from the authorities for fear of reprisal or persecution.)

Rom.10:21: “But regarding Israel he says, ‘All day long I stretched out my hands to a disobedient and contentious people.”” (It was necessary that the word of God be spoken first to the Jews, but they rejected this message of salvation. The gospel had been sufficiently proclaimed to Israel, but willful and disobedience prevented this.)

Tit.1:9: “[A bishop as God’s steward] holding fasts to the true message as taught so that he will be able to exhort with sound doctrine and to refute opponents.” (Paul instructs Titus to appoint upright, blameless, just, holy, and self-controlled presbyters holding fast to sound doctrine. The presbyter is called to teach and encourage the faithful. The presbyter is also called to refute and to persuasively convince opponents and adversaries.)

[Greek] ἀντιλογία (antilogia)

Heb.12:3: “Consider how He endured such opposition from sinners, in order that you may not grow weary and lose heart.” (Jesus had to endure the cross [like a slave] before receiving the glory of His triumph. Jesus provides us encouragement as we undergo difficulties and struggles. Some are even called to share in His sufferings.)

Pope Gregory XVI’s Encyclical Mirari Vos (1832): refuting the need for a human restoration of the Church ===> refuting Vatican II and Synodality!

“All truth was daily taught it by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. It is obviously absurd and injurious to propose a certain restoration or regeneration for her [the Church] as though necessary for her safety and health, as is she could be considered subject to defect or other misfortune. These authors of novelties consider that a foundation may be laid of a human institution. That what was a divine thing may become a human church.”

1. Jesus’ Church is a divine institution under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. There was NO need to change Jesus’ Church to accommodate the world.
2. It is absurd for to consider the need for human restoration or contradiction of Church teachings. These are essentially HUMAN TRADITIONS.
3. This encyclical repudiates the notion of creating a synodal man-made Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences.
4. What has been the result of Vatican II and Synodality? a Church being filled with worldliness and the “smoke of Satan” [the spirit of undermining within clergy and laity].
5. CONCLUSION: Great harm has been done to the Church! Archbishop Lefebvre was right all along: Tradition will provide TRUE REFORM and TRUE RENEWAL for the Church!
6. Vatican II has essentially undermined the idea of keeping the Church separate from the world. 

Pope Leo’s curious statement: “The supreme rule in the Church is love.” (This contracts Canon Law)

1. The supreme law of the Catholic Church is the SALVATION OF SOULS (as stated in Canon 1752 in the 1983 Code of Canon Law.
2. As a canon lawyer, it is VERY PERPLEXING that Pope Leo would not know this.
3. It seems that Pope Leo’s synodal mindset focuses more on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD contradicting Canon Law.
4. In this synodal Church, it is evident that there is NO FOCUS ON BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN AND NO MENTION OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF SIN.
5. There is no emphasis on forgiveness, conversion of heart, and sin. There is NO MENTION of the Church’s teachings against homosexuality.
6. There is more focus on tolerance, inclusion, false compassion, and “mercy above all else.“

Modernists’ antipathy and opposition against Tradition: (adapting to the world and culture):

1. Share decision making authority between clergy and laity. (Giving poorly catechized laity decision-making authority? What could ever possibly go wrong with this??)
2. Ignoring and diminishing the importance of Jesus’ command to sin no more (Jn.8:11): focusing on “mercy above all else”
3. Synodal path: remaking Jesus’ Church in a synodal Church (in the image of man and his lived experiences).
4. They are “keeping the door open on” women deacons: because women’s right’s have been disenfranchised and confusion of rights/vocations.
5. The Tradition Latin Mass (TLM) is now considered as divisive because it competes with the Novus Order Mass (and new Church ecclesiology). Therefore, the TLM must go!
6. Cardinal Cupic believes that the Traditional Latin Mass impoverishes and creates a spectacle in the church?? He says this while the Novus Order Masses attendance is dwindling and churches are closing. (What world (reality) is he living in? This cardinal is blinded by his own Synodal ideology.)
7. As the older progressive clergy continue to retire and die out, the Vatican seeks to push Synodality as a way to promote their Modernist ideology.
8. Perhaps Traditiones Custodes is the only remaining “tool in the box” the have to attempt to counter the Holy Spirit inspired organic movement back to Tradition.

Conclusion:

Contradict, contradiction, negate, negation, antilog

New Testament: Jesus’ statements (commandments) to sin no more (Jn.8:11-12) has become a sign of contradiction (stumbling block) for the Synodal Church. Sin forgiveness, and conversion of heart is rarely mentioned. More focus is being given to lived experiences, inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion.

Pope Leo gets political:

1. Pope Leo meets with President Obama’s political advisor David Axelrod (who is not Catholic).
2. Pope Leo continues to insert himself in criticizing President Trump’s immigration policy.
3. Pope Leo is accused of inventing a politicized biblical quote that Jesus would supposedly say. (Why would Jesus even talk about military, economic, and political matters?)
4. Pope Leo, in his earlier ministry, joined a communist march against President Reagan.
5. One wonders if Pope Leo was elected by the cardinals to become a political foil to President Trump.

Update: 37th World Youth Day [Lisbon, Portugal]: Cardinal Auguiar: “We don’t want to convert the young people to Christ or the Catholic Church or anything like that at all.” (God forbid that we seek to convince others to be Catholic or make disciples of all nations!)

Opposing, denying, or paying lip service to Church teachings against homosexuality: many are not told and many souls will be put in eternal mortal peril.

Marginalizing and denying the laity’s desire to celebrate the TLM: many emboldened bishops (with the support of the Vatican) to implement Traditiones Custodes

2009 USCCB press release: “Apathy and proselytism are opposed to unity. Proselytism, or the deliberate targeting of another Christian or group of Christians for the sole purpose of getting them to reject their church to join another, is NOT allowed.”  (The USCCB are evidently more concerned about unity rather than encouraging others to become Catholic! Let that sink in.)

Contradicting Church teachings: Brazilian bishop Lisboa de Oliveira dismisses Eucharistic adoration. This is a Synodal mindset reducing religion (doctrine) to one’s own lived experiences and religious sentiment.

Many had thought that Pope Leo would be a different pope who would oppose or undo Pope Leo’s actions. However, we are seeing that Pope Leo is following in Pope Francis’ footsteps. It is becoming more difficult for the “pope-splainers” to refute this.

Why are young men, but not young women, going (going back) to Church?

1. The toxic political and secular culture: criticizing and marginalizing masculinity
2. The Church: promotes traditional masculinity and traditional femininity
3. More more young women: continue to uphold modern femininity and feminism
4. Some young women: are becoming attracted to traditional femininity

Deacon Solari: “The liturgy is always political.” (This is classic Modernist and Synodalist thinking in that we must now conform how we worship to the standards of the world.)

Refuting German Synodal vitality: there were only 29 ordinations for Germany. The German Synodal Church is “renewing” and “reforming” itself into decline and heresy.

Tradition provides TRUE RENEWAL and TRUE REFORM for the Church.

Too many pro-LGBTQ bishops continue to spout the narrative that Catholic Church teachings marginalizes the LGBTQ community.

“Each generation is converted by the saint who contradict it most. ” GK Chesterton  (Archbishop Lefebvre already foresaw the problems that would come from Vatican II. Could he become a future saint?)

“False compassion, which is growing in this country, is a pity that is not shown to the mugged but to the mugger, not to the family of the murdered but to the murderer.” Archbishop Sheen

“The sin of this century is the loss of the sense of sin.” Pope Pius XII

[Greek] πεινάω (peinaō), [German] hungria sein, [French] avoir faimen: to hunger, to hunger for truth, to be hungry, to have a painful lack for something, to famish, to crave, to be famished, to be in a state of hunger, to desire strongly, to pine for, to suffer; 24 scriptures

Bread and Circuses: The Roman social contract in which the government leaders would provide free bread and free entertainment to the people.

Background Information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to be hungry (for food) and to fervently desire something (necessary to life).

Xenophons’ Symposium 4.36: “I am told of certain despots, who have such a greedy appetite for riches, that they commit much more dreadful crimes.”

Xenophon’s Cyropaedia 7.5.50: “The Hyrcanians were the first to become our friends, and a time when we were very hungry for allies, so that in our affection for them, we all but carried them in our arms.”

Xenophon’s Economics 139: “For you will do much with them (slaves) by filling their bellies with the food they hanker after.”

Juvenal: “Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt.”

Hunger:

1. Ever since antiquity, there are times when rulers have followed a social contract (duty) to ensure that their subjects have a subsistence level which will keep them from hunger.
2. The Pharaohs (and high officials) boasted of fulfilling this duty.
3. Plato concluded that begging should be forbidden by the law, since only the honest man deserves sympathy if he is hungry.
4. Bread and circuses (panem et circenses) was a Roman governmental social policy where the people no longer cared about political issues or participation, as long as they were being kept fed and entertained.
5. This policy lead to more and more extravagant and violent venues of entertainment. Other philosophies advocated moderation or self-sacrifice.

Old Testament: This term, relating to several Hebrew terms, refers to being hungry (for food), being voracious, being fatigued (weary), groaning, growling, languishing, and fainting.

Old Testament prohibitions against drinking blood (Lv.17:10-12): ****

1. Anyone who consumes any blood will be cut off from the people.
2. The life of the flesh is in the blood.
3. This blood is given to make atonement on the altar.
4. The Jews (disciples) were bound by their laws to refuse to drink Jesus’ blood that He was offering to them.
5. The tragic and cruel irony is that the Jews’ laws prevented them from partaking of everlasting life that Jesus offered them by consuming Jesus’ Body and Blood!

New Testament: This term means to hunger, to be hungry, and to crave.

Scripture:

Mt. 5:6: “Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness.” (Jesus refers to those who seek moral conduct in conformity to Christ and God’s will, mercy, blessedness, holiness, joy, peace, and things of heaven (not of the world).) 

Mt.25:35: “For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me.” (Jesus identifies with the hungry person who needs help. Catholic social teachings state that one must first seek to help your neighbor in your immediate sphere of influence. After this, focus outward from your location.)

Lk.1:53: “The hungry He has filled with good things; the rich He sent away empty. (The Canticle of Mary precedes the Sermon on the Plain. The hungry’ were filled and satisfied with God’s righteousness. The rich, more focused on earthly riches, are not concerned with righteousness. God, in His providence, may withhold or take away these riches through misfortune.)

Lk.6:25: “But woe to you who are filled now, for you will be hungry.” (Luke curses those who focus on earthly riches. They will be hungry. For their riches will be taken away.)

1. Who are filled now: who value earthly riches, affluence, wealth, over-indulgence, vanity, pride, status, and who do not value lasting spiritual treasures
2. Who will be hungry: their earthly property will be taken away, their property will have little value, they will hunger for something far better, their hunger will never be satisfied.

Jn.6:35: Jesus said to them, ‘I am the Bread of life; who comes to me will never hunger, and who believes in Me will never thirst.’” (In the Bread of Life Discourse Jesus offers His true Body and true Blood as spiritual nourishment for those who hunger and thirst. This becomes the Catholic basis for receiving the Eucharist.)

Bread of Life Discourse:

1. Jesus instructs others to work for food that endures for eternal life. (Jn.6:27)
2. Who ever comes to Jesus will never and thirst. (Jn.6:35)
3. The Jews murmuring among themselves as they can only see Jesus the carpenter’s son. (Jn.6:41-43)
4. Jesus states that He is the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. (Jn.6:51).
5.  The Jews quarreled among themselves. They are thinking, “Jesus is talking about cannibalism!”***
6. In Jn 6:54, 56-58 Jesus uses a more graphic and explicit form of eating His Body ===> gnawing or munching on  [Greek] τρώγω (trōgō): to gnaw, to munch.
7. Jn.6:54: “Whoever eats my Flesh and drinks my Blood has eternal life.”
8. Jn.6:56: “Whoever eats my Flesh and dinks my Blood remains in Me and I in him.”
9. Jn.6:57: “The one who feeds on Me will have life because of Me.”
10. Jn.6:58: Whoever eats this Bread will live forever.”
11. The disciples were having a very difficult time in accepting what Jesus was saying to them. (Jn.6:60)***
12. Many of His disciples walked away and no longer accompanied Him. (Jn.6:66)***    (Is this perhaps a coincidence to 666, the sign for the devil ===> disobedience, rebellion, and undermining? I don’t think so.
13. Jesus allowed these disciples to walk way. Jesus did NOT say, “Come back. I was only speaking metaphorically and figuratively!“
14. The sad and tragic irony is that the Jews (disciples) were forbidden by their Jewish customs to partake of life everlasting offered by Jesus.

“Rom.12:20: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by doing so you will heap burning coals upon his head.” (Individuals do not need to to take justice in their own hands. God will ultimately deal justly with those who have wronged you.)

Hungry enemy: They are those who hunger for revenge and retribution. One does not need to take justice into their own hands. God will ultimately deal justly those who have wronged you.

Feeding your enemy: This involves showing kindness to that person.

Heaping burning coals upon his head: Heaping kindness toward that person will invoke the pain of shame, remorse, embarrassment, and change of conscience.

Why many are NOT being adequately spiritually feed at Novus Order Mass:

1. At Vatican II, Pope Paul VI worked with a group of Protestant theologians to develop the NOM.
2. This was a misguided ecumenical effort (human tradition) to accommodate Protestants’ concerns.
3. This Mass focused more on a community meal rather than on the Sacrifice. Let that sink in.
4. This essentially makes the Mass more Protestant and less Catholic.
5. Many young people, starving for tradition and doctrine, are attracted to the Traditional Latin Mass, focusing on the Sacrifice.
6. The NOM continues to have sparse attendance, while the TLM continues to thrive.
7. Replacing or diminishing Catholic Tradition and practices ===> NOT being spiritually fed

Pine (as a verb), penury, penitence, penance, hungry, hunger, famine

Blessed are those who are spiritually hungry:

1. Many Protestants, questioning the deficiencies and problems with Protestantism, are now converting to Catholicism. They are seeking the spiritual depths of Catholicism.
2. Many young people, seeking to find answers about evil in the world, are turning to God or are going back to Church.
3. Many lax cradle Catholics are leaving the Church. This is helping to create a more faithful Church.
4. The Novus Order Mass continues to be sparsely attended either because of its liturgical abuse, lack of spiritual reverence, or lack of spiritual depth.
5. The young people (laity and clergy) continually to be attracted (spiritually fed) by the deep richness and reverence of the Tradition Latin Mass, not the NOM.

Conclusion:

Pagan culture: appeasement of the gods. “We must do whatever it takes to keep the gods happy. Otherwise, we will starve!”

Unwritten social contracts between rulers and their citizens:

1. Now you wonder why there were Roman gladiators and Christian executions in the Roman Colosseum.
2. Even to this day many people can’t get enough of violent entertainment.
3. Some becomes numb or de-sensitized to combat and violence ===> movies, social media, crime, violence.
4. Some enjoy the spectacle of physical combat and violence ===> MMA, professional wrestling

           Now the title of the Star Trek episode “Bread and Circuses” finally makes sense! A 20th century Roman empire televising gladiator contests!

Many Jews (disciples) could NOT see past their Jewish prohibitions from partaking of everlasting life offered by Jesus.

Jesus stands in the place of the hungry person and also provides spiritual nourishment (Bread of Life). Jesus calls the hungry blessed. This spiritual hunger may involve finding God’s will for oneself.

Penury is a state of extreme poverty and destitution. This is also related to the Greek peine and Latin poena, meaning pain. Interestingly the French word le pain means bread.

Update: Jesus calls all of us to help our neighbor. I pretty much think that Jesus was talking about one’s IMMEDIATE NEIGHBOR and not other nations’ immigrants and illegal immigrants. These bishops are still trying to get the US government to turn back on the govt. money supply.

Inverted priorities: The USCCB seem to be more concerned about illegal immigrants (illegal aliens) rather than instructing the faithful to help one’s immediate neighbor.

Ordered priorities: Focus first on feeding those in your immediate sphere of influence: oneself ==> family ==> neighborhood ==> parish ==> city ==> state ==> nation

Unfortunately, there are too many people who are filled and satisfied in only what the world offers to them. This can include status, fame, wealth, money, likes, indulgence, sin, and promiscuity.

The young people are flocking to the Traditional Latin Mass as they are not being spiritually fed by the Novus Order Mass.

Nearly 20,00 young people have attended the Chartres pilgrimage. These young Catholics are hungering for tradition.

It is always important to be reminded that Satan is the prince (ruler) of this world (Jn.12:31). Satan does not necessarily need to possess us. Satan only needs to make us forget about God.

What the world can offer is only fleeting and temporary in contrast to what Jesus can permanently offer (everlasting life.)

Riches and treasures:

1. Earthly treasures: will eventually pass away by time, loss, or ruin
2. Spiritual (heavenly) treasures: these are longer lasting: helping others, serving others, loving others, teaching others, feeding others, clothing others, provide drink for others.

Heaping burning coals on others: This can be also known as “killing people with kindness”

“The hunger for love is more difficult to remove than the hunger for bread.” Mother Teresa

“The things that we love [hunger for] tell us what we are.” St. Thomas Aquinas

“Be who you were created to be, and you will set the world on fire.” St. Catherine of Siena

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/chartres-pilgrimage-proves-young-catholics-hunger-for-tradition/?utm_source=twitter

[Greek] ἐπιτρέπω (epitrepō), [Latin] exire, [French] sortir, [French] partir, [Latin] permittere, [Latin] dimittere, [French] dispenser [French] admettre, [Latin] mittere, [French] jeter, [French] catapulter: to allow, to permit, to entrust, to let; 22 scriptures

Those who seek tolerance from others are actually quite often the ones who are intolerant to others.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to yield to, to permit, to let, to leave to, to indulge, and to rely upon.

Homer’s Odyssey 2.226: “To Mento, Odysseus had given all his house in charge.”

Aristophanes’ Plutus 1079: “With anyone but you I should not be so easy.”

Plato’s Euthyphro 5e: “That this is established and right and that we ought not to let him who acts impiously go unpunished.”

Plato’s Charmides 171e: “Nor should be we permit others under our governance to do anything but what likely to do right.”

Old Testament: This term means to loosen to relinquish, to permit, to forsake, and to abandon.

New Testament: This term means to permit and to allow.

Noteworthy scripture:

Would-be followers of Jesus: Lk.9:59,61, Mt.8:21

1. Jesus states that Christian discipleship must take precedence over family obligations. (Jesus is intolerant in saying this!)
2. Even family ties must NOT take precedence over the obligation of proclaiming the kingdom of heaven.
3. Jewish and Hellenistic cultures placed an extremely high importance on familial obligations.
4. Jesus: let the spiritually dead (who will not follow Him) bury their dead.

Mk.5:13: “And He let them [demonic spirits and the unclean spirits], and the unclean spirits came out and entered the swine. The herd of about two thousand swine rushed down a steep bank into the sea where they were drowned.” (The herding of swine indicates that Gentiles resided in the territory of the Gerasenes.)

Mk.10:4-5: “Moses permitted him to write a bill of divorce and dismiss her. Moses wrote this because of the hardness of your hearts.” ***

Old Testament: Taking a larger “bird’s eye” view of God’s relationship with man, one can claim that God was viewing the people of the Old Testament like adolescents, LOWERING THE BAR in their moral conduct.

***New Testament: Jesus RAISES THE BAR in moral conduct in referring back to God’s intended design for marriage. Jesus says to the people of the New Testament, “You now need to act like grown-ups and act accordingly.” 

Jn.19:38: “Joseph of Arimathea, secretly a disciple of Jesus, asked Pilate if he could remove Jesus’ body. And Pilate permitted it.”

Acts 21:39: “Paul said, ‘I am a Jew, of Tarsus of Cilicia; I request you permit me to speak to the people.” I [Paul] request you to permit me to speak to the people.'” (Saul was his Jewish name. Paul was his Roman name.)

Acts 28:16: “When he entered Rome, Paul was allowed to live by himself [in prison] with the soldier who was guarding him.” (Paul was placed under a mild form of custody. He was allowed to proclaim the Word.)

1Cor.14:34: “As in all the churches of the holy ones, women should keep silent in the church, or they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says.” (It must be acknowledged that this was a patriarchal society. Women speaking in public was considered an act of independence. Women conducted their activities separately and privately. This was part of the traditional view that a woman was to be subject to her husband.)

[Greek] τροπή (tropē), [Latin] trophaeum: a turning, trophy, revolution, or change; Jas 1:17

In 102 A.D. the Roman emperor Trajan erected the monument Trophaeum (Traiani) commemorating the victory (turning point) over the Dacians ===> trophy

Jas.1:17: “All good giving and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no alteration) or shadow caused by change [turning].” (Unlike the heavenly bodies, God is immutably constant, good, and unchanging.)

The Vatican’s outreach to accommodate the LGBTQ community:

1. In their efforts of inclusion, the Vatican is making concerted efforts to destigmatize, to normalize, and to ignore the sinful nature of homosexuality.
2. There are also many clergy who engage in the homosexual lifestyle. This has been stated by Peter Kwasniewski, Fr. Joaquim Heimerl, among others.
3. In addition, many clergy often “pay lip-service” to Church teachings against homosexuality. This is an aspect of practical atheism (paying lip service to God).
4. Pope Francis and Pope Leo have made questionable appointments who have questioned Church teachings. (John Paul II Institute)
5. Yet, they continually overlook or ignore: Jesus’ command to SIN NO MORE (Jn.8:11): “Neither do I condemn you, Go and from now on do not sin any more.”
6. They also continually ignore that Jesus was called to come to sinners. BUT HE DID NOT TOLERATE SINFUL BEHAVIOR!
7. Jesus exercised true compassion based on God’s moral order.
8. Pope Francis never intended to clamp down on the German bishops’ teachings on homosexuality and gender.
9. In an effort to accommodate the German bishops, the Vatican issued Fiducia Supplicans. This document deviously stated both Church teachings against homosexuality and provided “non-liturgical blessings” or a sinful same-sex union.
10. Fr. James Martin actually believes that St. Paul got it wrong about the sinful nature of homosexuality. Let that sink in! 
11. The Vatican recently permitted its Vatican LGBTQ Jubilee. Not surprisingly, scandal followed.
12. Why was Pope Leo silent about this? BECAUSE POPE LEO ALLOWED BISHOP SAVINO TO CELEBRATE THIS MASS! Evidently, it is not good optics to publicly criticize an event you will be had previously allowed.
13. A scandalous confirmation, led by Fr. James Martin was held in Manhattan New York. Evidently, Cardinal Dolan [fearful of offending the LGBTQ community] has remained quiet about this? Shocker!
14. Bishop Strickland pleaded with this brother bishops at the USCCB. Not surprisingly, his pleas were ignored. These bishops are evidently fearful or afraid in criticizing the LGBTQ community.
15. The USCCB just recently approved a “LGBTQ friendly” bible. This is seeking to whitewash or de-stigmatize the sin of homosexuality to make it more publicly acceptable.

Catholic psychiatrist Conrad Baars explains false compassion:

“A person in authority who deprives his subjects of the truth when he says, even with the best intention of helping them, ‘You may ignore the teachings of the Magisterium: God’s laws are too hard for you.’ By that he says in effect, ‘You are not and never will be strong and good enough to adhere to these laws.”  

Confusing tolerance with intolerance:

1. Tolerance is not a Christian virtue. It is never an end in itself [Archbishop Chaput]
2. Tolerance applies only to persons, but never to principles. [Archbishop Sheen]
3. Intolerance applies only principles, but never to persons. [Archbishop Sheen]
4. Tolerance is the ‘virtue’ of a man without convictions. [GK Chesterton]
5. Our society’s obsession with tolerance leads to intolerance. [Charles Colson]
6. The Church is intolerant in principle because she believes. [Rev. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange]
7. The enemies of the Church are tolerant in principle because they do not believe. [Rev. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange]

Jesus’ teachings of tolerance?? (This is a great fallacy!)

1. What does this even mean? Following Jesus is a binary choice. You either follow Him or you do NOT follow Him.
2. Jesus stated that if you choose to follow Him, you must sin no more. Jesus is BEING INTOLERANT in saying, “Sin no more.” (Jn.8:11)
3. Jesus associated with sinners, but He DOES NOT tolerate their sinful lifestyles and sinfulness.
4. Jesus stated that if you DO NOT follow Him, you are walking in darkness (Jn.8:12). Jesus is not being tolerant when He said this.
5. Jesus is infinitely merciful to us. But conversion requires repentance and conversion of heart.
6. Many people are get confused about what tolerance and intolerance means.

Traditional Catholic view: Men’s and women’s vocations are assigned by God and the Church. Men ==> priests [in the person of Christ] and deacons. Women ==> nuns, sister, consecrated

Synodal (a human and political view):

1. Vocations are often defined by one’s perceived rights and political power.
2. Therefore, there must be equal gender equality in Church leadership positions.
3. Women should have the opportunity to become priests and deacons.
4. Men’s and women’s vocations can be assigned by man. (The German Synodal Church already seek to do this.)
5. If this cannot be possible, then many may wonder if the Church is misogynistic??
6. The Synod is still studying the idea of women deacons. Let that sink in! But THIS IS NOT CATHOLIC!

‎Trope: This is a figure of speech used for artistic effect.  Ex. Achilles’ heal ==> weak spot

Conclusion:

Permit, permission, admit, admission, mission, catapult, exit, sort, part, dispense, reject, rejection, sortie, resort, trophy

It was commonly thought that the gods controlled one’s fate and destiny.

Update: George Orwell: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” It is important not to allow others to deny and obliterate one’s understanding of our country. Orwell was very prophetic about hate speech, cancel culture, and others’ naive understanding of history.

Many people, Christians and non-Christians, who do not accept or tolerate others’ values (and behaviors), are now the ones being intolerant, hateful, and extreme. (Those who accuse others of being intolerant are actually the ones who are being intolerant! (like those criticizing American Eagle and Sydney Sweeney)

Arkansas Gov. Huckabee was just recently forced out from a restaurant because the LGBTQ restaurant managers “felt unsafe” [were intolerant to Gov. Huckabee].

In Germany, a Catholic priest was put on trial for hate speech because he condemned homosexuality (which is actual Church teachings!). It seems that the German clergy are really now promoting homosexuality as an acceptable behavior. Very alarming!

Pope Leo, has endorsed Pope Francis’ Amoris Laetitia. Reducing and watering down liturgical requirements for marriage and family [for the sake of inclusion and tolerance] TAKE PRECEDENCE over Church teachings. This Synodality becoming an IDOL!

The Save America Act: Democrats continue to oppose this bill because they will not allow for illegals to stop voting in elections. The Democrats continue to say that this is Jim Crow 2.0

The Vatican (and Synodal Church’s LGBTQ “outreach”: “You in the LGBTQ community are not and never will be strong and good enough to adhere to these Church teachings. You can get a pass.” (Is this message being disseminated to the LGBTQ community? It seems so.)

The UK House of Lord has just legalized abortion up to birth, allowing for the right the end the life of the unborn without any consequences. Evidently women’s “rights” now take precedence over the unborn’s rights.

German bishop Hemer Wilmer is waiting for the “Holy Spirit of Surprises” to allow for women’s ordination in the Church. This is a dangerous immoral and evil cultural appropriation of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit can only stand for Truth!

Former ‘hot priest” Alberto Ravagnani leaves the priesthood because he cannot accept celibacy. Shocker! He shouldn’t have been allowed in the priesthood in the first place when he has such a poor understanding of the priesthood and celibacy.

Synodality, becoming a new religion in “MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD’  is essentially LOWERING THE BAR to adherence to Catholic teaching. 

If you assume that Catholics and Christians are intolerant, hateful, and extreme, they get their moral belief systems from God. Then one must conclude that God MUST BE INTOLERANT, HATEFUL, AND EXTREME! (Good luck with supporting this view!)

We now need leaders and shepherds who show TRUE COMPASSION in pointing out what is morally right and wrong. Otherwise, one’s eternal (spiritual) welfare could be at stake!

Quotes by GK Chesterton who has often be called the “apostle of common sense”:

Quotes on tolerance:

“In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” George Orwell

“America [and other places] are suffering from tolerance: tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ and chaos.” Bishop Fulton Sheen

“Societies are far gone in depravity when toleration is considered a good in itself, without regard to the thing tolerated.” GK Chesterton

[Greek] νικάω (nikaō), [Latin] vincere, [Latin] victoria, [Latin] supervenire, [French] surprendre, [French] agresser, [French] surpasser,  [French] conquerir, [German] seigen: to conquer, to overcome, to prevail, to overpower; Lk.1:22, Jn.16:33, Rom.3:4, Rom.12:21, 1Jn.2:13-14, 1:Jn.4:4, 1Jn.5:4-5

The Christian sect Nicolaitans wreaked havoc in the early Church with their toleration, inclusion, worldliness, and false compassion. In their efforts to create a new Synodal Church, the Modernists (and Synodalists) have essentially become the New Nicolaitans!

Pope Leo XIV: “Our task is not to build a Christendom.” (Let that sink in!)

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to surpass, to prevail, to conquer, to be victorious, to carry the majority, to appeal to the mob, and to yield to excellence.

Sophocles’ Ajax 1357: “I yield to his excellence much more than his hostility.”

Plato’s Phaedrus 56b: “For they have truly conquered the Olympic contests.”

Aeschylus’ Eumenides 88: “Remember, do not let fear overpower your heart.”

Sophocles’ Antigone 233: “The view prevailed that I should come to you.”

Euripides’ Orestis 944: “The villain spoke and gained his point by appealing to the mob.”

Mythology: Nike is the goddess of victory. Throughout history mortals (man) have called upon the gods seeking favor, fortune, and victory. The Greeks worshipped Nike, believing that she could grant them the strength and speed to be victorious. The related Roman goddess is Victoria.

Old Testament: This term means to excel, to be pre-eminent, to be permanent, to be innocent, to be clean, to stand victorious as a martyr, and to stand innocent before the judgment. God’s victory is the only answer one can give to the meaning of evil.

New Testament: This term means to overcome, to conquer, and to be victorious. Victories and defeats may be temporary in life, but Christ has the ultimate victory. One must conquer evil with good. The victor is the Christian who holds fast to his faith and does God’s will in the face of opposition and persecution.

Scripture:

Lk.11:21-22: “When a strong man fully arms his palace, his possessions are safe. But when one stronger (Jesus) than he attacks and overcomes him (Satan), Jesus takes away the armor on he relied and distributes the spoils.” (The strong man is the devil. The palace is the world (kingdom of the devil.)

Lk.11:21: The strong man’s possessions (those whom the devil secures in their sinful state):

1. Ignorance: This includes of God, ourselves, truth, busyness, and salvation. The devil blinds our eyes and hardens our hearts.
2. Unbelief: Our fallen nature, doubts, disobedience, barriers against God.
3. Hardness of heart: Inability to fill sorrow from sin, closemindedness, failure to acknowledge sin, inclination for sin, lack of need for conversion.
4. Hatred and enmity toward God: failure to acknowledge God’s ways, corruptness, failure to acknowledge Truth, inclination for hatred.
5. Pride: Selfishness, self-exultation, self-indulgence, vanity, arrogance, rebellion, “I will not serve”, “I know better…”
6. Jesus attacks and overcomes Satan’s armor: (Jesus overcomes Satan’s control over his subjects.)
7. Jesus distributes the spoils: (Jesus releases those who are possessed and controlled by the devil.

Jn.16:33: “I have told you this so that you may have peace in Me. In the world, you will have trouble, but take courage, I have conquered the world.” (Trouble in this world: great tribulation, malice, persecution, affliction, torment, pride, treachery, sin, arrogance, ignorance, and “being of this world”.)

Rom.12:20-21: “For by so doing you will heap burning coals upon his head. Do not be conquered by evil but conquer evil with good.”

Rom.12:21: Conquering evil with good (kindness):

1. Being conquered by evil is a sign of weakness, not strength. To repress this desire for revenge because a personal victory for oneself.
2. Your actions will illustrate the power of the gospel.
3. Your actions may serve to disarm your enemies of their rage.
4. Your actions may serve to confound the evil one, who seeks to stir up one’s passions and desires.
5. Allow God to repay with vengeance upon others.
6. “Kill” your enemies with kindness (serving, feeding, and serving them).
7. Showing them kindness is like heaping burning coals upon their heads: make them feel the pain of shame, embarrassment, remorse, and repentance.

Who were the Nicolaitans?

1. They were an early Christian sect who resided in Ephesus and Pergamum (Rev.2:17).
2. Their beliefs consisted of a doctrine of tolerance and compromise, paganism, and sin.
3. The Nicolaitans’ teachings and deeds ultimately conquered and subdued the people.
4. Jesus hated the Nicolaitans’ deeds because they FAILED TO LIVE A LIFE OF SEPARATION FROM THE WORLD’S VALUES.

Why did Christ hate the deeds of the Nicolaitans?

1. They advocated for a watered-down form of Christianity where sin is ignored and and repentance is disregarded. (Changing Church teachings to accommodate the world.)
2. This was a doctrine of tolerance, inclusion, and compromise. (Sound familiar?)
3. The Nicolaitans were luke-warm in faith and paganistic. (Having nothing substantial to believe in. Believing in idols.)
4. The Nicolaitans made a mockery of their faith. (Ignoring, normalizing, and blessing sin. Sound familiar?)
5. Holy living and separation from the world was not encouraged. (Removing the distinction between clergy and laity.)
6. These “Christians” sought a truth in the world. (Adapting the Church to the world’s values. Sounds like lived experiences!)
7. Absolute truth, doctrinal truth, and biblical truth were minimized. (Adjust the truth to the culture.)
8. No exclusionary belief that Christ alone is the way to heaven. (Dismissing the idea that Christ is only way to achieve salvation.)
9. They do not believe that Christ alone is the way to heaven. (Engaging in questionable ecumenism.)

Scriptural references about the Nicolaitans:

Acts 20:29: Savage wolves will come among you

Acts 20:30: Some will come forward perverting the truth to draw the disciples away

Acts 20:33: I have never wanted anyone’s silver or gold (pagan worship of Artemis)

Jud.1:8: These dreamers nevertheless defile the flesh, scorn lordship, and revile glorious beings.

Rev.2:7: “But you have this in your favor; you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.”

Conclusion:

Victory, victorious, conquer, conquering, siege, invincible, laity

It is interesting that even Plato acknowledges that one can live a harmonious and virtuous life, yet one may succumb to evil influences.

In the Old Testament, some Maccabeeans overcame temptation, persecution, even to the point of martyrdom in remaining faithful to their faith. Innocence and cleanliness can also make reference to one’s faithfulness.

We all must NOT forget that the Satan is the ruler (prince) of this world. (Jn.12:31). Satan does not need to possess us, but only to make us forget about God.

Update: Examples of Modernists and Synodalists’ tolerance, inclusion, worldliness, and false compassion:

1. In their “outreach” to the LGBTQ community, the Vatican is tolerating, overlooking, destigmatizing, and denying sin (homosexuality) under the guise of tolerance and inclusion. 
2. Traditional priests are deemed a scandal, rigid, clerical, and separate from the world.
3. Synodality seeks to decentralize and share bishops’ doctrinal and decision-making authority with laity. This sounds very Protestant. Are they trying to creating a new Church?
4. Engaging in questionable ecumenical efforts to seek unity of faiths OUTSIDE the Catholic Church. Catholicism must no longer be pre-eminent.
5. Watering down requirements for receiving the sacraments for the sake of inclusion.
6. Seeking to bestow blessings on same sex unions. This is permitted because of a “new situational morality”. Non-liturgical blessings seek to bless evil.
7. Synodality is remaking Jesus’ Church into a worldly synodal Church (in the image of man). Worldly values, secularism, relativism, and sin creep into the Church.
8. Appointing scandalous and empowered clergy who promote their ideologies (pro-LGBTQ) and political agendas (immigration, social justice.).
9. Permitting and allowing pagan idols and indigenous cultural rituals into the Mass. Permitting concelebration of Anglican ministers at Mass.
10. Paying lip service to Church teachings and Christ.
11. Expressly downgrading Mary’s status in the Church for the purpose of accommodating Non-Catholic and Protestant concerns.
12. Vatican II: Pope Paul VI worked with Protestant theologians in creating a Novus Order Mass focusing more on a community meal rather than the Sacrifice.
13. Adjusting to a new truth: the TLM must be restricted.

Lax criminal policies and emboldened criminal activity have overcome liberal cities, which have forced many businesses and individuals to leave.

Failing to live to life of separation from the world’s values: because of Vatican II, worldliness and the “smoke of Satan” (spirit of undermining) has forced itself into the Church (clergy and laity).

Synodality seeks to double down on what Vatican II had started. Synodality is creating a worldly Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences.

Moral cowardice on display: NOT one bishop of England and Wales spoke out against the heresy of Fiducia Supplicans. Synodality (fear of offending the LGBTQ community) takes precedence over Church teachings. Synodality becomes an IDOL!

Confiscatory liberal economic policies are also forcing corporations and companies to leave liberal states (California and New York).

The Vatican LGBT “outreach” (fear of  offending the LGBTQ community), is putting many people’s eternal mortal souls in jeopardy.

Fortunately, common sense, women’s rights, and traditional Christian morality seems to be winning over “gender affirming care [surgery].“

The tyranny of transgenderism essentially means, “I know better than you [God] in what gender I should be!” and “You must refer me to the gender I proclaim to be!”

Synodality takes precedence over Jesus’ command to sin no more (Jn.8:11). Sin is often ignored, diminished, disregarded, or repudiated.

In a sense, many of us are also like “little pagans” bowing our heads down and being controlled by  our electronic devices and other gods (money, fame, power, social media, possessions, stuff, etc.)

MANY MODERNISTS AND SYNODALIST CONTINUE TO FORCE THEIR IDEOLOGIES ON THE FAITHFUL LIKE MODERN-DAY NICOLAITANS! 

“We do not want a Church that will move with the world. We want a Church that moves the world.”  GK Chesterton

“The greatest obstacle in the apostolate of the Church is the timidity or rather the cowardice [fear of offending others] of the faithful.” Pope Pius X

“All the strength of Satan’s reign is due to the easy going weakness of Catholics.” St. Pius X 

Pope Pius X prophesized that the Modernists WOULD CREATE HAVOC AND CAUSE DAMAGE INSIDE THE LEADERSHIP STRUCTURES OF THE CHURCH. The Synodalists have essentially become the successors to the Modernists. 

[Greek] στήκω (stēkō), [Latin] tenere, [Latin] conprehendere, [Latin] adprehendere, [Latin] continuare, [Latin] remittere, [German] halten, [French] incarcerer, [French] conquerir, [French] persister: to take, to seize, to take hold, to maintain, to restrain, to hold fast, to restrict; 50 scriptures

 Instead of holding onto traditional Catholic teachings, Vatican II and Synodality have brought into the Church “fresh air” (worldliness) and the “smoke of Satan” (spirit of undermining) so that the Church “can get with the times.”

Background information:

New Testament: This term means to stand, and to stand firm.

1Cor. 16:13: “Be on your guard, stand firm in the faith, be courageous and strong.”

Standing firm in the faith:

1. Faith means the act of believing in the body of truth that we believe
2. Being firm in holding and defending the truths of the gospel
3. This means not yielding to any foe, oppressor, false teachers, false doctrines, and temptations
4. This means holding on your personal confidence in God (Jesus Christ)

Gal.5:1: “For freedom Christ set us free; so stand firm and do not submit again to the yoke of slavery.” (Paul makes a distinction between the Old Testament laws and customs (bondage and slavery) and Jesus’ covenant that sets us free.)

Php.4:1: “In this way stand  firm in the Lord, beloved.” (Paul makes the distinction between Christ’s followers and enemies of the cross. Christ’s followers seek their citizenship in heaven. In Php.4:3 Paul makes reference to Clement as his co-worker. Clement will later become Bishop of Rome [4th pope 88-97 A.D] )

Enemies of the cross:

1. Their end is destruction (according to their works ===>sin and perdition
2. Their God is their stomach: their desire, appetites, sins and evil deeds are as common as food
3. Their glory is their shame: boastfulness, arrogance, shame, desires, and sin
4. They are focused on earthly and worldly things (money, politics, power, immigration, social justice, environment)

2Thess.3:15: “Stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by oral statement or by a letter of ours.”

Oral Tradition:

1. The ‘scriptures’ mentioned in the New Testament actually referred to the Old Testament.
2. The New Testament’s “canon of books” had NOT yet been formulated.
3. The CHURCH (AND ORAL TRADITION) PROCEEDED THE SCRIPTURES!!!
4. The primary means for the transmission of faith was by word of mouth (oral tradition).
5. Paul entrusted the deposit of faith (oral tradition) to Timothy.
6. Many could not read or write. Printing materials were scare and expensive.
7. Letters were sent in response to issues (crises) in the geographical areas.
8. Luke, a 2nd or 3rd generation Christian, learns about Jesus through oral tradition and eyewitness accounts.
9. The Catholic faith stands on three legs (pillars): sacred scripture, apostolic Tradition, and the living Magisterium (teaching authority of the Church.)
10. This refutes Sola scripture (the belief that scripture is the sole source of authority.

Pope Gregory XVI’s encyclical Mirari Vos (1832): refuting the need for a human “restoration” of the Church:

“All truth was daily taught it by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. It is obviously absurd and injurious to propose a certain restoration or regeneration for her [the Church] as though necessary for her safety and health, as is she could be considered subject to defect or other misfortune. These authors of novelties consider that a foundation may be laid of a human institution. That what was a divine thing may become a human Church.”

1. This encyclical repudiates and invalidates the need, purpose, and validity of bringing HUMAN traditions, worldliness, and spirit of undermining into the Church.
2. Prior to Vatican II, the Church was SEPARATE FROM THE WORLD. This is actually a very good thing for the Church and for society.
3. Prior to Vatican II, the Church IS the Catholic Church. (“Outside the Church there is NO salvation.”) CCC 846
4. Jesus’ Church is a divine institution under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. There was/is no need to change Jesus’ Church.
5. St. Augustine also states that there is no salvation outside the Church.
6. We are all called to be temporary earthly sojourners and citizens of heaven. (1Pet.2:11, Php.3:20, Ep.2:19)

Salvation of souls: The Canon 1752 in the 1983 Code of Canon Law ends with the statement, “The salvation of souls, which always be the SUPREME LAW of the Church, is to be kept before one’s eyes.” (This means that all laws and practices are to be interpreted through the lens of the Church’s mission to facilitate salvation.)

Human traditions introduced into the Church:

1. Focusing more on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN.
2. Girl “altar boys”
3. The Church looks more like a United Nations NGO than a divine Church.
4. Bishops are more focused on politics, immigration, social justice, social causes, and environment rather than with spiritual matters.
5. There is little or no mention of sin and Jesus’ statements of sin.
6. More and more questionable ecumenical efforts to seek unity of faith OUTSIDE the Catholic Church.
7. Lived experiences take precedence over Church doctrine and teachings.
8. The Novus Order Mass becomes more focused on a community meal rather than the Sacrifice. (This was created from a collaboration of the Vatican and Protestant theologians.)
9. Receiving the Eucharist on the hand: this practice was initially supported by disobedient bishops. This practice later became normalized and applied universally.
10. Synodality: clergy sharing decision-making authority with the laity, decentralizing Church authority, discussions about women priests and women deacons
11. Sole Fide
12. Sola Scriptura: becoming your own self-authoritative interpreter of scripture

Conclusion:

Tenure, tenant, tenacity, comprehension, comprehend, apprehend, conquer, remit, remission, persist, persistence, incarcerate, incarceration

Update: Archbishop Lefebvre was condemned for refusing to abandon the Traditional Latin Mass.

The current elephant in the room: Synodality is just the latest HUMAN TRADITION in the Church.

St. Teresa believed that receiving the Eucharist on the hand as the worst evil she has seen. Evidently, she foresaw the sacrileges that would occur with this practice. Let that sink in!

Contrary to public opinion, Pope Benedict VI claimed that the TLM was never abrogated.

The SSPX was created to preserve the TLM. Yet the SSPX is often accused of being schismatic. Let that sink in!

The SSPX has been more faithful to Tradition. This speaks volumes about how far Vatican conciliar (and Synodal) Church have gone off the doctrinal rails!

Bishop Strickland, Cardinal Burke, Archbishop Vigano, Bishop Schneider, espousing traditional Church teachings, are often deemed as troublesome or schismatic by the Synodal Church. This speaks more about the Synodalists and the Synodal Church. 

Many in the Church (both clergy and laity) have lost sight that we are only temporary sojourners on this earth.

Pope Gregory XVI prophetically refutes the need for a human restoration of Jesus Church. The human traditions resulting from Vatican II and Synodality has created a pastoral and spiritual disaster for the Church.

Tradition is TRUE REFORM and RENEWAL for the Church.

Church attendance: the TLM is thriving (where allowed). The NOM is sparsely attended. The German Synodal Church is “renewing” and “reforming” itself into decline and heresy.

Britain’s new autocratic police state is now arresting people for standing up for saying for free speech and expression which is deemed “offensive”. 

More moral cowardice: NOT one bishop of England and Wales spoke out against the heresy of Fiducia Supplicans. Lived experiences (tolerance, inclusion, and false compassion) TAKE PRECEDENCE over Church teachings. This is Synodality becoming an IDOL!

“We do NOT want a Church that will move with the world. We want a Church that will move the world.” GK Chesterton.

“In the Catholic Church itself, all possible care must be taken, that we hold fast to that which has been believed everywhere, always, and by all.” St. Vincent of Lerins

“Let us stand fast in what is right, and prepare our souls for trial. Let us wait upon God’s strengthening aid and say to Him, ‘O Lord, you have been our refuge in all generations.'” St. Boniface

“Do not be afraid to stand up for what you believe in, even if you stand alone.” St. Joan of Arc

Next post: to contradict, to oppose

[Greek] διαφέρω (diapherō), [Latin] melior, [Latin] transferre, [Latin] disseminare, [Latin] supervenire, [Latin] differtus, [French] transporter, [French] reporter, [French] transcrire, [French] agresser: to transmit, to divide,  to distinguish, to spread, to carry through, to differ, to bear apart, to be better; 16 scriptures

Archbishop Lefebvre warned us about the consequences of bringing worldliness and “the smoke of Satan” [spirit of undermining] into the Church because of Vatican II and Synodality. A Church SEPARATE from the world is actually a very good thing.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to carry through, to navigate, to excel, to stand out, to pass, to bear, to surpass, to be important, and to differ.

Plato’s Apology 35a: “To be superior in wisdom or courage.”

Demosthenes Erotic Essay 61.46: “He admirably and considerably spread his record of his achievements.”

Herodotus’ The Histories 4.138: “Histiaeus opposed the plan [voted differently]”

Euripides’ Orestis 251: “Then you be different from that evil brood.”

Old Testament: This term means to transmit, to change, to take away, to scatter, to divide, to differ, to be distinguished, and to be superior, to being alienated, being changed, and doing something different.

New Testament: This term means to spread (carry through), to become more valuable, to differ, to be important, and to drive about.

Scripture:

Mt.6:26: “Look at the birds in the sky; they do not sow or reap, they gather nothing into barns, yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not more important than they?” (Jesus refers to dependence on God. Although Jesus does not deny the reality of human needs, He warns each of us not to be a “slave” to these worries.)

Mk.11:16: “Jesus did not permit anyone to carry anything through the temple area.” (The buying and selling were being done in the court of the Gentiles, the outermost court of the temple area. Of course, the Jews would place these buyers and sellers in this area, designated for the Gentiles. Jesus was angry in that it curtailed His efforts to reach the Gentiles.)

Mt.12:12: “How much more valuable a person is than a sheep. So it is lawful to do good on the sabbath.” (The Jews had already had provisions for saving the life of man and animals on the sabbath. But this was not a case of man’s life being in danger. The Jews, hoping to find something to accuse Jesus with, asked Him if it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath. Jesus points out that man is much more valuable. 

Acts 13:49: “The word of the Lord continued to spread throughout the whole region.”

1. Paul stated that it was necessary that word was to be spoken to the Jews. But the Jews rejected it.
2. Paul was then called to spread (carry through) the word to the Gentiles.
3. The word continued to spread from Antioch to other provinces in Turkey.
4. Antioch is where the followers of Jesus were first called Christians. (Acts 11:26)
5. The Jews incited opposition against the Christians and persecuted Paul and Barnabas.

Rom.2:18: “And know His will and are able to discern what is important since you are instructed from the law.” (The Jews were instructed by the law. God did not initially address its revelation to the Gentiles. Rather, God made it possible for Gentiles to know instinctively [in their hearts] the difference between right and wrong.)

Gal.4:1: “I mean that as long a the heir is not of age, he is no different from a slave, although he is the owner of everything.” (The child was no different than the slave under the authority of the guardian. God sent His Son that we might receive adoptions as sons and daughters of God. This adoption also frees from being enslaved to the elemental powers of the world.)

Php.1:9-10: “[Paul]: this is my prayer: that you increase every more and more in knowledge and every kind of perception, to discern what is of value, so that you may be pure and blameless for the day of Christ.” (Paul calls each of us to properly distinguish between right and wrong and good and bad. One must be both intelligent and discriminating (making good choices.)

Seeing two different sides of Pope Leo: Speaking about marriage and not speaking (remaining silent) about LGBTQ:

1. He publicly speaks out about the importance of the centrality of the family and its fundamental societal role.
2. He welcomes Fr. James Martin in a private audience. He still allows Fr. James Martin to continue his LGBTQ “outreach”.
3. He approves the LGBTQ Vatican Jubilee Mass. He later remains silent about the resulting scandal and sacrilege. (Evidently, it does not become good optics to publicly criticize a scandalous event which you had previously approved of in the first place. So you remain quiet.)
4. He evidently is continuing Pope Francis’ message of “welcome and inclusion” which overrides following the Church’s teachings against homosexuality.
5. He continues to cause confusion for the faithful into thinking that the Vatican may give approval to the homosexual lifestyle. Evidently, doctrinal clarity will not do.
6. He and many of the clergy continue to remain silent about the the widespread homosexual lifestyle of many clergy in the Church.
7. He warmly welcomed a “same-sex couple at the Vatican.
8. He does NOT inspire confidence that the Church’s teachings against homosexuality will be enforced.
9. For Pope Leo, silence can mean assent.

Differences between Pope Leo XIII and Pope Leo XIV on Christendom:

Pope Leo XIII:

1. There was once a time when states were governed by the philosophy of the gospel.
2. It was the power and divine virtue of Christian wisdom that had diffused through laws, institutions, and morals of the people.
3. Civil society was renovated by Christian institutions.
4. Unfortunately, liberalism now proclaims the supremacy of the human reason, refusing submission to divine and eternal reason.
5. It is individual man who can determine for himself what is true and what is good. (Sounds like lived experiences ===> Synodality.)
6. This liberalism can be become religious liberalism (Tradition is “rigid”), political liberalism (bishops engage in politics), and moral liberalism (paying lip service to Church teachings against sin).===> Sound familiar?

Pope Leo XIV:

1. He stated, “Our task is NOT to build a Christendom.“
2. This statement is in stark opposition to Mt. 28:18-20: “Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”
3. The Synodal Church is more focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN.
4. The Synodal Church is now engaged in politics, immigration, environmental causes, and social justice.
5. The Synodal Church focuses more on inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion rather than on Church teachings, moral teachings, sin, Jesus’ statements of sin, and conversion of heart.
6. Many clergy often engage in sinful lifestyles, promote LGBTQ ideology, and seeking to “reform” and “renew” Church teachings, vocations, and infrastructure.
7. Synodality (lived experiences) often take precedence over Church teachings. Synodality becomes elevated as an IDOL!
8. The Synodal Church now engages in questionable ecumenism seeking unity of faiths outside the Catholic Church.

Is there really much difference between today’s Catholics (Christians) and the Nicolaitans?

Who were the Nicolaitans?

1. They were an early Christian sect who resided in Ephesus and Pergamum (Rev.2:17).
2. Their beliefs consisted of a doctrine of TOLERANCE, COMPROMISE, PAGANISM, and SIN.
3. The Nicolaitans’ teachings and deeds ultimately conquered and subdued the people.
4. Jesus hated the Nicolaitans’ deeds because they FAILED TO LIVE A LIFE OF SEPARATION from the world’s values.

Why did Christ HATE the deeds of the Nicolaitans?

1. They had a watered-down form of Christianity where sin is ignored and repentance is disregarded. (Sound familiar?)
2. They had a doctrine of tolerance, inclusion, and compromise. (Sound familiar?)
3. They were luke-warm in faith and paganistic. (Having nothing substantial to believe in. Believing in idols.)
4. They made a mockery of their faith. (Ignoring, normalizing, and blessing sin.)
5. Holy living and separation from the world was not encouraged. (Removing the distinction between clergy and laity. Democratizing the Church.)
6. They sought a truth in the world. (Adapting the Church to the world’s values. Sounds like lived experiences (Synodality) taking precedence over Church teachings. This sounds like Synodality becoming an IDOL.)
7. Absolute truth, doctrinal truth, and biblical truth were minimized. (Adjust the truth to the culture.)
8. They did not believe that Christ alone is the way to heaven. (Dismissing the idea that Christ is only way to achieve salvation [questionable ecumenical efforts].) 

Pope Gregory XVI’s Encyclical Mirari Vos (1832): refuting the need for a human restoration of the Church ===> refuting Synodality!

“All truth was daily taught it by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. It is obviously absurd and injurious to propose a certain restoration or regeneration for her [the Church] as though necessary for her safety and health, as is she could be considered subject to defect or other misfortune. These authors of novelties consider that a foundation may be laid of a human institution. That what was a divine thing may become a human church.”

1. Jesus’ Church is a divine institution under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. There was NO need to change Jesus’ Church to accommodate the world.
2. It is absurd for the need for human restoration or regeneration of the Church. These are essentially HUMAN TRADITIONS.
3. This encyclical repudiates the notion of creating a synodal man-made Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences.
4. What has been the result (DIFFERENCE) from Vatican II and Synodality? a Church filled with worldliness and the “smoke of Satan” [the spirit of undermining within clergy and laity].
5. CONCLUSION: Great harm has been done to the Church! Archbishop Lefebvre was right all along: Tradition will provide TRUE REFORM and TRUE RENEWAL for the Church! 
6. Vatican II has essentially accomplished the very things why Jesus hated about the Nicolaitans. To remove the separation of the Church to the world! 
7. Restoring Tradition and traditional practices completely undermines the clergy’s Modernist and Synodalist ideology. 

Conclusion:

Differ, difference, defer, ameliorate, transfer, transport, transmit, report, transcribe, disseminate, propagate, supervene, aggressive, aggressor, seminary

Update:

Differing positions on the SAVE America Act:

1. “This is Jim Crowe 2.0. Some people are incapable of providing voter ID.”
2. “This will ensure voter integrity. This will ensure that illegals will not be able to vote.”

Differing points of view on the SSPX’s consecrations:

1. Cardinal Mueller: “The only possible solution is to recognize our Holy Father Pope Leo XIV as the legitimate pope not only in theory but also in practice.”
2. Cardinal Zen: “Schism must be avoided at all costs. The SSPX must listen to Pope Leo’ explanations of Vatican II. Pope Leo must also respect the conscience of the SSPX.”
3. Archbishop Vigano: “The Vatican’s refusal is a double standard. Synodality opens the way to schism. The SSPX is denied permission to consecrate bishops because it is NOT following Vatican II.
4. Archbishop Schneider: “Excommunication of the SSPX would not be valid because there is no intention to do a schismatic act on the side of the SSPX.”
5. Bishop Eleganti: “The new schism of the SSPX is not justified.”
6. Fr. Joachim Heimerl: “This situation has become a dark night. We have been accustomed to the fact that the Church has been radically changed since Vatican II. The SSPX insists on the uncontaminated faith of the pre-conciliar Church.”
7. My position: This situation speaks more about how much the Church has gone off the “doctrinal rails” since Vatican II. One must ask, “Which group has remained more faithful to Jesus’ Church?? It is the SSPX! And yet the SSPX becomes the “bad guy”.

Synod of Synodality’s “moral cultural appropriation” of the Holy Spirit: Synodal advocates often use the term “Holy Spirit of Surprises” to provide justification for enacting their novel Synodal changes to Church teachings and practices in committees. This is dangerous and evil because the Holy Spirit can only stand for TRUTH!

One must ask: “Is there much difference between the Nicolaitans and the Conciliar (and Synodal) Church? Not much. They are more similar than different.

Pope Gregory XVI was very prophetic in what would happen when you have the Church accommodate the world. Having the Church SEPARATE FROM THE WORLD is actually a very good thing for the Church. Vatican II and Synodality contradicts Pope Gregory’s concerns.

“We do not want a Church that will move with the world. We want a Church that will move the world.” GK Chesterton.

“There is only one Church of God, and that is the Catholic Church.” Asst. Bishop Athanasius Schneider

“In every sin, we choose to believe the devil’s lie rather than God’s truth.” Peter Kreeft

“Whoever presumes to introduce or teach pass on another creed or whoever presumes to introduce a novel doctrine. We declare to be anathematized.” Pope Agatho

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-leos-silence-on-the-lgbt-agenda-is-fueling-sexual-revolution-in-the-church/?utm_source=twittercath

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/report-leo-xiv-says-our-task-is-not-to-build-a-christendom/

[Greek] ἁρπάζω (harpazō), [Latin] rapere, [Latin] pati vim (to suffer violence): to snatch, to seize, to catch, to attack, to plunder, to gain control; 16 scriptures

More and more empowered bishops are seeking to force Synodality on the faithful. This is leading NOT to unity but to further division in the Church.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to snatch away, to carry off, to rob, to overpower, to grab, and to plunder.

Homer’s Iliad 3.44: “Never yet was I so personally enamored of you as at this moment, not even when I first carried you off from Lacedaemon and sailed away with you.”

Euripedes’ Andromache 661: “And, when I, in forethought for you and for me, meant to kill her, I find she is snatched from my hands.”

Xenophon’s Anabasis 6.1.8: “A robber approaches, as soon as the seaman approaches him coming, he snatches ups his arms, goes to meet him, and fight him to save his oxen.”

Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes 259: “In my weakness, fear controls my tongue.”

Old Testament: This term means to seize, to plunder, to take away, to tear, and to capture.

New Testament: This term means to steal away, to take, to carry off, and to snatch.

Mt.11:12: “From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent are taking it by force.” (The scripture may provide several meanings. Some will enthusiastically and forcibly take the kingdom of God in a good sense. The enemies of Christ and Christians may see to take away the notion of the kingdom of God from those who seek it. The kingdom of heaven may be taken away and become closed to some others.)

Mt.13:19: “The seed sown on the path is the one who hears the word of the kingdom without understanding it, and the evil one comes and steals away what was sown in his heart.” (This is one whose poorly formed faith becomes subject or vulnerable to the evil one’s pressure, influence, and manipulation.)

Jn.6:15: “Since Jesus knew that they were going to come and carry Him off to make Him king, He withdrew again to the mountain alone.” (Jesus fled away because He already knew that His followers also wanted Him to be a temporal king, seeking worldly and political power. His followers had it in their minds that Jesus can become powerful king that they were longing for.)

Jn.10:28: “No one can take them [sheep] out of My hand.” (Christ’s sheep are in His hands. To be in the hands of Christ, is to be high in His esteem and favor.)

Acts 8:39: “When they [Phillip and the eunuch] came out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched Phillip away, and the eunuch saw him no more.” (This is not a miracle. The Spirit strongly admonished Philip to go to some other place. Phillip’s mission with the eunuch was completed.)

Acts 23:10: “The dispute was so serious that the commander, afraid that Paul would be torn to pieces by them, order his troops to go down and take Paul into the compound.” (Paul stated that he is on trial for hope in the resurrection. Paul’s comments caused a great uproar between the Pharisees and Sadducees.)

Jd.1:23: “Save others by snatching them out of the fire; on others have mercy with fear, abhorring even the outer garments stained by flesh.”

Jude’s letter:

1. This letter was written to warn others against false teachers and Gnostics.
2. False teachers were seeking to worm their way into community.
3. The Apostles stated that scoffers will live according to their godless desires.
4. These false teachers are the ones who cause divisions.
5. These false teachers live on the natural plane, devoid of the Holy Spirit.
6. Have mercy on those who waver and those who may face the fires of punishment.
7. You are called to not to avoid anything that may have sin, pollution, and disease.

Two troublesome, misleading, and confusing statements from Pope Leo.

“No one should impose his or her ideas; we must all listen to one another. No one is excluded, we are called to participate.”

1. In contrast to Pope Leo’s statement, there is only one Truth, stated from Catholic Church teachings. Others are NOT allowed to have their own truth.
2. Pope Leo is implying that Truth can be disregarded or not followed.
3. Only the clergy (pope, cardinals, bishops, and priests) are permitted to preach the truth.
4. Synodality seeks to blur the lines between clergy and laity in formulating decision-making authority, Church doctrine and teachings, vocations/”rights”, and Church organization.
5. Synodality advocates continually seek to affirm the “Holy Spirit of Surprises” to ratify or affirm their synodal agenda. This is dangerous in that the Holy Spirit can only stand for Truth!

“People want the Church doctrine to change, want attitudes to change, I think we have to change attitudes before we ever change doctrine.”

1. This is unprecedented that Pope says that objective moral Church teachings COULD CHANGE because of peoples’ attitudes.
2. Pope Leo is more concerned with accommodating the LGBTQ community’s concerns rather than with Church teachings against homosexuality.
3. Pope Leo was only very happy to permit the LGBTQ Jubilee in the Vatican. Pope Leo remains silent on this Church scandal and liturgical sacrilege.
4. The Synodal Church’s synodal outreach of tolerance, inclusion, and false compassion takes precedence over Church teachings against homosexuality (and sin).
5. This indicates that Fr. James Martin holds great influence in the Vatican.
6. The Church’s teaching on sexual morality can be ignored or adapted to accommodate the culture.
7. The Synodal notion of walking together, lived experiences, and shared decision making provides this justification allowing for attitudes to change Church doctrine and teachings.

Brazilian Archbishop declares automatic excommunication for priests celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass outside authorized chapel.

1. This illustrates another example of empowered clergy and feckless Vatican leadership concerning the TLM.
2. This further illustrates the clergy marginalizing the faithful by taking away the TLM from them.
3. It is claimed that celebrating the TLM is act of public schism.
4. This contradicts Pope Benedict’s statement that the TLM and Novus Order Mass can both be celebrated.
5. This is another example of the Modernists and Synodalsts forcing Synodality on the faithful.

Conclusion:

Rape, rapture, patience, patient, vigor

Aeschylus: fear can quite often take control over us

New Testament: Paul also mentions that he was caught up in the Rapture

Update: Prejudice, conflict, suffering, persecution, and martyrdom can become forms of taking away the kingdom of God Christians. But such suffering and martyrdom for Christ can easily opens the door for salvation.

There has been a recent resurgence of Protestants converting to Catholicism. Many Protestants and former Protestants are taking away their earlier anti-Catholic “blinders” [prejudices and presumptions] about Catholicism.

Sign of things to come with Synodality. The German Synodal Church is “reforming” and “renewing” itself in decline and heresy. The Italian Synodal Church is unfortunately following their path.

Many bishops are seeking to force Traditiones Custodes on the faithful because they CANNOT stop the organic desire for Tradition (which is the work of the Holy Spirit).

Tradition and actually following traditional Church teachings will lead to TRUE reform.

Many of the younger generations (both clergy and laity) are taking to Tradition by force, while the older generations continue to stay with modernity and Modernism. This is another reason why they are implementing Traditiones Custodes.

The Vatican and many other empowered bishops are continuing to implement Traditiones Custodes against the wishes of the laity.

Bishop Strickland, Archbishop Vigano, Asst. Bishop Schneider, promoting traditional Catholic beliefs, are either removed from office or placed in remote position by the modern Synodal Church.

Because of the Synodal Church’s LGBTQ “outreach” and pro-LGBTQ views, many clergy and laity continue to think that homosexuality can be permissible, de-stigmatized, or even normalized. The Church’s teachings against homosexuality and sin is not being taught. Many souls will put be put in mortal peril at the judgment.

Jd. 1:23 warns against those false teachers and other teachers who focus on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN.

Some bishops are sending some conservative or traditional priests to St. Luke’s Institute, a Catholic center providing specialize mental health, for “evaluation.” Sounds like a Soviet style “psych ward”. It seems that these conservative and traditional priests are becoming threats to the Synodal leadership.

Pope Leo “degraded” [demoted] African Bishop Gneba for the “crime” of issuing a pastoral directive ordering the faithful to report to him any priest who was not faithful to his vow of celibacy, having children, committing sexual abuse, or financial misconduct. [ensuring priests follow high moral standards]. Many clergy claimed that Bishop Gneba lacked an understanding of the “synodal” Church.

“Christ does not force our will. He takes only what we give Him. But He does not give Himself entirely until He sees that we yield ourselves entirely to Him.” St. Teresa of Avila

“We are absolute dictators in deciding whether we wish to offer our will to God. And if we turn it over to Him, He will do great things in us.” Archbishop Fulton Sheen

“The love of husband and wife is the force that welds society together.” St. John Chrysostom.

“Be grateful for trials and tribulations, as they force us to have recourse to the heavenly Consoler! When all is going well, we forget God; only in adversity do we seek Him for comfort.” St. Frances de Sales.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/synodality-undermines-the-hierarchical-communion-of-the-church/?utm_source=twittercath

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/leo-xiv-publicly-doubts-catholic-teaching-on-sexual-morality-and-the-immutability-of-dogma/

[Greek] σκανδαλίζω (skandalizō), [Latin] offendere, [French] huerter, [French] indigner, [German] shockieren: to offend, to scandalize, to cause to sin, to stumble, to trip up, to trap; 45 scriptural references

Satan is the prince of this world (Jn.12:31) ===> worldliness and the “smoke of Satan” creeping into the Church. Unfortunately, we continue to have Satanically “inspired” clergy and laity who seek to undermine the Church.

Background information:

Skandalon: A skandalon can be a dead-fall trap, snare, obstacle, and stumbling block.

Greek Hellenism: This term means to set traps, to cause to stumble, to give offense, to take offense, and to stumble.

Aristophanes’ Archarnians 687: “The accuser, desirous of conciliating the younger men, overrules us with his ready rhetoric; he drags us before the judge, presses us with questions, and lays verbal traps for us.”

Epictetus: “If someone succeeds in provoking you, realize that your mind is complicit in this provocation.”

Old Testament: This term means to stumble, to slip, to be trapped (in a spiritual context). The action of falling always takes on a more serious sense than the stumbling block. This action of falling results in a ruined relationship with God.

Spiritual harlotry:

1. This is an intercourse of the mixing of Old Testament values with worldly values, idolatry, paganism, and sin.
2. Abandoning the Lord for a foreign god was called prostitution or adultery.
3. Against God, the harlot prostitutes oneself with idolatry, paganism, and sin.
4. Interestingly, the related Greek word is porneia ===> pornography, porn!  Not a good look!

New Testament: This term means to cause one to sin, to take offense, and to fall away. No offense, but I will just mention some noteworthy scriptural examples. ☺☺☺

Causing one to sin:

Mt.18:6: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” (The gravity of this sin is so great that it would be better to have been drowned than to have committed this sin. A MILLSTONE MOMENT! See the very end of this post!)

To take offense:

Mt.11:6: “Blessed is the one who takes no offense at Me.” (Taking offense is becoming a stumbling block to Jesus and rejecting Jesus’ teachings and statements.)

Mt.15:12: “Then His disciples approached and said to Him, ‘Do you know that the Pharisees took offense when they heard what You said'”. (The Pharisees were scandalized about what Jesus said about their vain worship, empty hearts, and human traditions.)

Mt.17:27: “But that we may not offend them, go to the sea, drop in a hook, take the first fish that comes up. Open its mouth and you will find a coin worth twice the temple tax. Give that to them for Me and you.” (The Jews were obligated to pay the the temple to the authorities. Jesus tells His disciples to respect these customs. Jesus provides the means to pay this tax.)

Jn.6:61: “Since Jesus knew that His disciples were murmuring about this, He said to them, Does this shock you?'”

1. Jesus did not try to convince His disciples to come back by saying, “I was only speaking figuratively!”
2. The GREAT AND SAD IRONY is that the Jews were forbidden to drink the blood because of Jewish customs (the life is in the blood [Deut.12:23].
3. This Jewish restriction prohibited the Jew from partaking of the blood.
4. But partaking of Jesus’ Body and Blood gives us life everlasting!)

Mk.6:3: “Is He not the carpenter, the son of Mary, and the brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? Are not His sisters here with us? And they took offense at Him.” (The Nazarenes could not see that a carpenter’s son could be a teacher, prophet, and Messiah. They could not accept Jesus coming from a position of humility.)

To fall away:

Mt.13:21: “But he [seed]: has no root and lasts only for a time. When some tribulation or persecution comes because of the word, he immediately falls away.” (This is the person whose faith is not strong enough to endure when struggles, opposition, and persecution come.)

Mt.24:10: “And then many will be led into sin; they will betray and hate one another.” (This is one who falls away, becomes scandalized, or who becomes apostates.)

Mt.26:31: “Then Jesus said to them, ‘This night all of you will have your faith in Me shaken.'” (Difficulties or circumstances cause one to betray, to disobey, or fall away from Jesus’ teachings.)

2Cor.11:29: “Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is lead to sin? and I am not indignant?” (As a sinner himself, can empathize with the sinner. But he is also indignant at the one who sins.)

Who is led to sin:

1. Who is made to stumble and who causes others to stumble
2. Who becomes a stumbling block (to himself or to others)
3. Who is led astray or causes others to go astray
4. Who gives offense and scandalizes.

[Greek] σκάνδαλον (skandalon)

Mt.16:22-23: “Peter rebuked Jesus, ‘God forbid, Lord! No such thing shall ever happen to you.’ Jesus turned to Peter, ‘Get behind Me, Satan! You are an obstacle [scandal] to Me. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.'”

1. At first glance, Peter’s statement toward Jesus sounds reasonable: Peter, concerned for Jesus’ safety, does not want Jesus to die.
2. However, this statement is scandalous and evil. This statement seeks to deflect Jesus’ mission from the Father.
3. Peter was briefly “inspired” from Satan. Peter has just made a satanic and evil statement.
4. Satan seeks to undermine Jesus’ mission to die on the cross to seek redemption for humanity.

Modern-day syncretism (harlotry) of Christianity with worldly values, paganism, and sin in the Church:

1. Remaking Jesus’ divine Church into a synodal wordly Church (in the image of man)
2. Inserting pagan idols, Anglican concelebrants, indigenous cultural practices, and LGBTQ Jubilees in the Mass
3. Seeking outward synodal ecumenism outside the Catholic Church: accommodating and seeking unity with other faiths 
4. Appointing scandalous and morally questionable clergy, pro-LGBT bishops, politically motivated bishops 
5. Engaging in LGBTQ outreach: inclusion, tolerance, false compassion, Overlooking, ignoring, and normalizing sin
6. Synodality: clergy and laity sharing decision making authority about Church teachings and Church practices
7. Synodality: bringing lived experiences, worldliness, tolerance, and inclusion into the Church. 
8. Supporting Fiducia Supplicans: clergy allowing “non-liturgical blessings” for same-sex couples, putting many soul’s in moral peril
9. Permitting the German bishops to continually “renew” and “reform” itself into decline and heresy. This is great warning sign about Synodality.
10. Church authorities continually seeking to downgrade Mary’s status in the Church for purposes of accommodating Protestants
11. Church authorities’ indifference and silence (tacit acceptance) towards scandal (LGBTQ Jubilee) and scandalous priests (Fr. James Martin)
12. Inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion take precedence over sin, Jesus’ statements on sin, forgiveness, and conversion of heart

Literature:

1. The Catholic Douay-Rhims translation of the New Testament, published in 1582, caused quite a stir when it replaced the words “offend” and “stumbling block” with “scandalize” and “scandal.”
2. Despite initial criticism, this terminology was accepted in the European continent accustomed to scandals in many aspects of life.
3. Medieval and Renaissance writers, including Shakespeare, quickly adopted these terms.
4. Interestingly, Shakespeare’s play Hamlet makes references to mousetraps and scandals.

Conclusion:

Scandal, scandalize, indignant, shock, shocking hurt, offend, offensive

It is quite interesting that Epictetus already understood the notion of someone “living rent-free” in another person’s head. (Trump Derangement Syndrome perhaps?)

Jesus often speaks in purposely exaggerated terms (cutting off limbs and eyes) to illustrate the more serious consequences of sin.

Brothers and sisters: This term referred to cousins. There was not yet a word for cousin.

Update: It is unfortunately scandalous (but not surprising) that the Vatican continues to restrict the TLM and to remove altar rails in more and more churches.

It is also scandalous that too many Cardinals, bishops, and priests are still remaining silent about Church scandals because they are FEARFUL AND AFRAID OF OFFENDING their superiors, the Vatican, the laity, and the LGBQT community!

Let’s not forget that USCCB has also put together a “LGBTQ friendly” bible whitewashing homosexuality.

Fr. Pat Fitzgerald said that distributing Holy Communion to the faithful in their mouth is like feeding animals.” (Quite a scandalous statement!)

At the Our Lady of Pompeii parish in Corrientes, a local priest publicly blessed a couple who both identify as transgender. A male, presenting as a woman, and female, presenting as a man, completed a standard marriage preparation.

It was St. Peter Damian in the 11th century who had shed light on the scandal of homosexuality in the priesthood (promotion of this lifestyle, sexual abuse, silence, and covering up). Sound familiar? Yet we continue to have many priests living in a homosexual lifestyle.

The USCCB, doubling down on their immigration efforts, criticize the US government’s mass deportation efforts. Yet, the tone-deaf USCCB does not respect Catholic social teaching on foreigners respecting countries’ borders and their implicit culpability in funds being sent for illegal immigration, leftist causes, and child trafficking.

Quotes on scandal:

“It is better that scandals arise than the truth be suppressed.” Pope St. Gregory the Great

“We should even go beyond doing what is required in order to avoid scandal.” St. Basil

“Homosexual marriage is false, and a scandal.” Cardinal Robert Sarah

“The worst kind of heretic is the one who, while teaching mostly true Catholic doctrine, add a word of heresy, like a drop of poison in a cup of water.” Pope Leo XII

[Greek] σχίσμα (schisma), [Latin] scissura, [Latin] scisma, [Latin] dissensio: split, division, tear, gap, separation; Mt.9:16, Mk.2:21, Jn.7:43, Jn.9:16, Jn.10:19, 1Cor.1:10, 1Cor.11:18, 1Cor.12:25

We now have a Church divided between those who seek a divine traditional Church and those who seek a worldly Synodal Church. Pope Pius X correctly prophesied that the Modernists (and Synodalists) would overtake the Church.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means division of opinion, leaving aside, split, division, shattering, separation, and fraction.

Herodotus’ The Histories 2.17: “We leave the Ionians’ opinion aside, and our own judgment about the matter is this: Egypt is all that country which is inhabited by Egyptians.”

Aeschylus’ Agamemnon 623: “It is not easy to conceal when true and good are split apart.”

Herodotus’ The Histories 7.219: “The Hellenes then took counsel, but their opinions were divided.”

Old Testament: This term means split, cleaving, division, break, tear, and a calling out.

New Testament: This term means tear and division.

Mt.9:16: “No one patches an old cloak with a piece of un-shrunken cloth, for its fullness pulls away from the cloak and the tear gets worse.” (This parable speaks of the unsuitability of attempting to combine the old and the new. Jesus’ teaching is not a patching up of Judaism, nor can the gospel be contained within the limits of the Mosaic Law. Jesus seeks to fulfill the Old Testament.)

Causing divisions:

Jn.7:43: “So a division occurred in the crowd because of Him.” (Some thought that Jesus was the Messiah, a Prophet, a blasphemer, or a criminal.)

Jn. 9:16: “So some of the Pharisees said, ‘This man is not from God, because He does not keep the Sabbath.’ Others said, ‘How can a sinful man do such signs?’ And there was division among them.” (Jesus healed a blind man on the sabbath. The Pharisees saw Jesus as a sinful man [not from God] who would break the sabbath law by performing this healing. These actions angered the Pharisees, who even questioned if the man was originally blind.)

Jn.10:19: “Again there was a division among the Jews because of these words.” (The Jews were disturbed by Jesus’ words in referring to God as His Father and laying down His life for His sheep. Some could not accept His teaching and walked away. Some said that Jesus was blasphemous or possessed.)

1Cor.11:18: “First of all, I hear that when you meet as a church there are divisions among you, and to a degree I believe it.” (Paul speaks to a spirit of discord and divisiveness in the Church. These pertain to different loyalties to ministers (Paul, Apollos or Peter), cliques/quarrels, and how the Lord’s Supper is celebrated.)

Archbishop Lefebvre vs. Vatican II (and Pope Paul VI):

Why did Archbishop Lefebvre form the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) in 1970? He sought to preserve the traditional Catholic faith, doctrine, and liturgy in response to the dangerous liberalizing changes following Vatican II.

Why did Archbishop Lefebvre consecrate his bishops? To maintain apostolic succession and the continuity of the Church’s leadership and traditional teachings.

What happened to the SSPX afterwards? This society expanded its network of priests, seminaries, and faithful worldwide in the decades to come.

2026: the SSPX vs. Vatican II (and Pope Leo):

Why is the SSPX seeking to make new consecrations?

1. One must have obedience to the pope, but the pope cannot become a despot with power.
2. It is lawful to resist the Pontiff who attacks souls, destroys civil order, or tries to destroy the Church.
3. The SSPX’s action is a legitimate act of self-defense.
4. The SSPX is exercising a higher power of obedience to the Magisterium.
5. The SSPX must follow what has been handed down from the bishops.
6. If a contemporary command contradicts the Church’s ancient teaching, it loses authority.
7. Preservation of the TLM is at stake.
8. This action is not of schismatic rebellion.
9. This is supported by the 1983 Code of Canon Law Canon 1323.

Etymology:

1. The Latin noun schisma means split, separation, and schism.
2. The Latin noun scissura means tearing and split
3. The Latin noun dissensio means disagreement, dissension, and rift
4. From past history, scissor mean tailor, carver, and cutter.
5. “Oh scissors” was a 19th  century exclamation of impatience and disgust.

Conclusion:

Schism, schismatic, sect, dissent, dissention

New Testament: this term is always used to make reference of divisions inside the Church, but not in the modern sense of divisions against the Church.

Update: There continues to a huge division as to what the Church should be: a traditional Church or a synodal Church

Division within the Church:

1. Traditional Latin Mass and Traditional Catholic teachings vs. Novus Order Mass and Synodality
2. Implementing Traditiones Custodes vs. the laity’s wish for the TLM
3. Whether or not to remove receiving the Eucharist on the tongue, “Extraordinary” ministers, and kneelers
4. Following Church teachings against homosexuality vs. LGBTQ “outreach” of inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion
5. Traditional understanding of vocations vs. opening women to the diaconate and priesthood
6. What should be the primary mission of the Church? BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN vs. MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD
7. Bringing other faiths INTO fold of the Catholic Church (traditional ecumenism) vs. accommodating and seeking unity with other faiths OUTSIDE the Catholic Church (synodal ecumenism)
8. Maintaining traditional Church ecclesiological authority vs. clergy and laity sharing decision making authority about Church doctrine and Church practices
9. Traditionally-minded bishops vs. pro-LGBTQ bishops
10. Following Jesus’ teachings on sin vs. synodal lived experiences, inclusion, tolerance, and ignoring Church teachings against sin
11. What is true renewal and reform for the Church? TLM (thriving attendance) vs. NOM (sparse attendance). Yet the TLM is being suppressed for ideological reasons
12. Appointing and keeping scandalous (heretical) clergy in positions of authority: removing scandalous clergy vs. keeping scandalous clergy in positions
13. Scandals, confusion, and heresy: Publicly speaking out against scandal vs. keep silent ==> (tacit agreement)
14. Traditional Catholic appreciation of Mary vs. the Synodal downplaying of Mary’s status (in order to appease Non-Catholics)
15. Traditional Latin Mass vs. insertion of pagan and cultural influences in the Mass

Some traditionally minded clergy (Bishop Strick, Bishop Schneider, Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Mueller, Bishop Eleganti) are often ironically seen as “divisive” according the Synodal Church

Archbishop Lefebvre’s actions, contrary to Vatican II’s intentions, were seen as divisive and schismatic. This conclusion actually speaks more negatively on the  Vatican II’s proponents’ liberal and progressive ideology.

Why is the Vatican II (and Pope Leo ) in potentially awkward situation in responding the SSPX’s desire to consecrate priests. The Chinese govt. signed off on new SSPX consecrations. This forces the Vatican in a no-win situation in refusing this.

It is important to be reminded that the SSPX was never officially deemed schismatic.

There continues to be divisive views about ICE and sanctuary cities policies. Should there be ICE? Should there be sanctuary cities? But are these opponents actually saying that they are opposed to removing criminals from the cities?

Depending upon one’s political perspective, there continue to be divisive views about election integrity. However, more and more information is coming about about the 2020 election fraud. 2020 is NOT going to be known as the “most secure election” in history.

“There is nothing more serious than the sacrilege of schism because there is not just cause for severing the unity of the Church.” St. Augustine

“It is impossible to restore peace if the cause of the schism is not previously removed, and the Pope, who is declared to be equal to Go, does not come to self-realization.” St. Mark of Ephesus

“The world and the world to come are two enemies. We cannot therefore be friends to both; but we must decide which we will forsake and which we will enjoy.” Pope Clement I

[Greek] ἀνέχομαι (anechomai), [Latin] pati, [Latin] sustinere, [Latin] subportare, [Latin] suffere, [French] endurer, [French] maintenir, [French] soutenir: to tolerate, to put up with, to bear, to endure, to be patient with; Mt.17:17, Mk.9:19, Lk.9:41, Acts 18:14, 1Cor.4:12, 2Cor.11:1,4,19, Eph.4:2, Col.3:13, 2Thess.1:4, 2Tim.4:3, Heb.13:22

Pope Pius XI prophetically warns about questionable future ecumenical efforts. Unfortunately, ecumenism now means accommodating and seeking unity with other faiths.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to endure, to bear, and to abide.

Plato’s Phaedo 109e: “If his nature were strong enough to bear the sight, he would recognize that his this is the real heaven.”

Sophocles’ Ajax 660: “Ever since I took into my hand this gift from Hector, my greatest enemy, I have gotten no good from Greeks. The gifts of enemies are not gifts an bring no good.”

Homer’s Iliad 1.586: “Be patient, my mother, and endure for all your grief.”

Old Testament: This term means to endure, to bear, to put up with, to restrain oneself, and to receive (accept) someone or something.

New Testament: This term means to endure, to accept (tolerate), and to forbear (be patient with). If you will put up with me, I will only illustrate scriptural passages regarding questionable behavior. ☺☺☺

Mt.17:17: “Jesus said, ‘O faithless and perverse generation, how long will I be with you? How long will I endure you? Bring him to me.'” (Jesus chides the scribes’ unbelief and the disciples’ lack of faith. Jesus pointed out the disciples’ little faith [lack of trust] that Jesus was the Messiah. This inevitably results in their failure to heal the possessed boy.)

1Cor.4:12: “When ridiculed, we bless; when persecuted, we endure.”

Paul criticizes the Corinthians’ behavior:

1. Paul warns that the Corinthians must not go beyond what is written, so that none of you will be inflated with pride, false wisdom, vain speculation, arrogance, and self-importance.
2. Paul reminds the Corinthians about what gives them this distinction. These gifts come from God. Why are you boasting?
3. Paul tells them that they have become satisfied, have become like kings, and have become a spectacle to all.
4. Paul reminds them that Christians must be like fools (seen by the world) in focusing on Christ.
5. In contrast, Paul calls the Corinthians ‘wisdom’ as being ‘full of themselves’.
6. Paul reminds them that Christians must endure when persecuted.
7. Enduring must involve patience, perseverance, no ill will, no revenge, and no retribution.

2Cor.11:4: “For if someone comes and preaches another Jesus than the one we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it well enough.” (Paul points out that his opponents are identified with a cunning spirit. A perverted message of Christianity has been caused by satanic influences. The battle for minds has to do with the understanding of Jesus, the Spirit, and the gospel. The Corinthians have flirted with a different understanding than the traditional one Paul has down to them.)

2Cor.11:19: “For you gladly put up with fools, since you are wise yourselves.” (Paul criticizes the Corinthians’ “wisdom” in tolerating other questionable people and ideas. As a result, the Corinthians would tolerate and become enslaved (captivated and seduced) by these foolish ideas.)

2Tim.4:3: “For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine, following their own desires and curiosity, and will accumulate teachers.” (Paul calls upon his followers to be courageous, patient, constant, and enduring in proclaiming the word in the face of opposition, hostility, indifference, and persecution. Paul calls upon on his followers to be persistent whether it is convenient or inconvenient and to convince, reprimand, and encourage through all patience and teaching.)

Changing Church teachings for purposes of being ecumenical.

1. Pre-Vatican II: The Church of Christ IS the Catholic Church.  (“Outside the Church there is NO salvation.” The Church remains as a divine institution SEPARATE from the world.)
2. Vatican II: The Church of Christ SUBSISTS in the Catholic Church. Any concept of the Catholic as being necessary for salvation has been minimized or eroded in order to be ecumenical. There begins a new “spirit” of ecumenism accommodating other faiths.
3. At Vatican II, Pope Paul VI worked with a commission of Protestant theologians to create a more “Protestantized” Novus Order Mass with the focus on a community meal rather than a sacrifice. Let that sink in!
4. Synodality: Jesus’ divine Church is becoming transformed into worldly synodal “listening” Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences. Clergy and laity (both Catholic and non-Catholic are no involved in defining the Church: decision making authority regarding vocations, Church organization, Church teachings, and Church doctrine. ===> huge red flag. The Church is tolerating this practice. Let that sink in!
5. Synodality (lived experiences, tolerance, inclusion, and false compassion) take precedence over Church teachings. The Church is tolerating this practice. Let that sink in!
6. Pope Leo evidently seeks to double down on synodal ecumenism with other faiths. Pope Leo erroneously claims that Pope Leo XIII as an early champion of ecumenism.
7. Synodal ecumenism has become a new cunning spirit overtaking the Church.

What did Pope Leo XII say about ecumenism?

1. He taught that Christianity is visible grounded in faith, sacraments, and governance.
2. He rejected the idea of an invisible or merely spiritual Church.
3. He affirmed that full unity requires adherence to the authority established by Christ in the Catholic Church.
4. He wrote that those who accept only parts of Christian doctrine do not rely on faith, but on their own judgment.
5. He wrote that the unity of the Church as inseparable from obedience to Christ.
6. He urged others to acknowledge the orthodoxy of Catholic doctrine and to reject Protestant theological positions.
7. He holds to the traditional Catholic understanding of ecumenism in bringing other faiths into the fold of Catholic Church.

How does Pope Leo XIV seek to find ecumenism?

1. He advocates the pursuit of Christian unity in the dialogue between Churches and ecclesial communities.
2. He advocates for a forward looking ecumenical framework “seeking reconciliation through dialogue as we share gifts and spiritual heritage.”
3. He states that contemporary unity “does not imply an ecumenism that attempts to return to prior divisions.”
4. He would be open to remove the Filoque [theological controversy] for the sake of unity with other faiths. (The Filoque was added to address a heresy in Western Europe.)
5. He proposes that the Nicene Creed would be the basis and reference point for offering a model for “true unity.”
6. He proposes a Synodal approach for ecumenism rather than traditionally bringing other faiths into the fold of the Catholic Church. Let that sink in!
7. He claims that “different faith are already one.” (This contradicts Catholic teaching that Christian unity is grounded in shared faith, sacraments, and governance.
8. He minimizes and disregards the notion that the Catholic Church already contains the fullness of Truth. Then why is seeking ecumenism with other faiths?
9. The traditional Catholic understanding of ecumenism has been inverted (from inwards to outwards).

False Compassion (ecumenism) toward the LGBTQ community:

1.  Catholic psychiatrist Conrad Baars: “A person in authority who deprives his subject of the truth when says, even with the best of intentions of helping them, ‘You may ignore the teachings of the Magisterium. God’s laws are too hard for you.’
2. This is essentially saying, ‘You are not and never will be strong and good enough to adhere to these laws.’ (You can live by another morality.)
3.  This is essentially the Church’s “outreach” to the LGBTQ community. The Church is accommodating and tolerate this sinful lifestyle.
4. Inclusion, tolerance, false compassion, and fear of offending the LGBT community essentially take precedence over Church teachings against homosexuality. This is Synodality becoming an IDOL.
5. By refusing or failing to state Church teachings (and sin), the Church is permitting many souls to be put in eternal peril of mortal sin at the judgment. The Church is tolerating this practice. Let that sink in!

Etymology:

1. The Greek verb anechomai derives from (ana-) up and (-echo) to sound.
2. The Latin verb subportare means to carry (-portare) under (sub-).
3. The Latin verb patere means to suffer, to endure, and to permit.
4. The Latin noun passionem means suffering. Patient means capable of enduring misfortune and suffering.
5. The Latin verb suffere mean to carry (-ferre) under (sub-).
6. The Latin verb sustinere means to hold (-tenere) under (sub-).

Conclusion:

Patience, patient, suffer, suffering, passion, sustain, endure, endurance, support

Sophocles makes reference to the notion of accepting gifts (beware of Greek bearing gifts.)

Old Testament: God continues to put up man’s sinful and fallen nature. Moses makes reference to a twisted and perverse generation worshipping idols, devoid of reason, lacking in understanding, forgetting God, and being foolish. Sound familar?

Paul makes references to the Corinthians’ supposed “wisdom”: “We’re good here, you can just move along.”

Paul points out the Corinthians’ tolerance of heresy, immorality, and corruption. These opponents are identified with the cunning serpent.

Update: In his encyclical Caritatis Studium (1898), Pope Leo XII directly invited the Anglican into reconciliation with Rome.

In fact, it is Satan who actually “gets us” and affirms us in our sin. We can easily imagine that the serpent would say the same thing to Adam and Eve in the garden.

The “Jesus Gets Us” Superbowl commercials often presents dangerous and confusing messages in presenting a “radically inclusive” Jesus. Jesus is infinitely merciful in offering forgiveness for sins but Jesus does not tolerate our sinful behavior and lifestyles.

It has been reported that the USCCB have devoted 90% of their budget to immigration and refugee settlement but only 1% to pro-life activities. What does this say about their priorities?

Pro-life Catholics and Christians are now called “extreme”, “hateful, and “anti-abortion.”

Ignoring Jn.8:11 [Go and sin no more] may lead people to think that Jesus says nothing about people sinning. This presents a skewed version of Jesus.

Why is the Vatican still allowing the German bishops to continue their heretical synodal “reform” and “renewal”?

Ignoring Jn.8:12: [Whoever follows Me will NOT walk in darkness] leads people to think sinful people are following Jesus. This also presents a skewed version of Jesus.

The German Synodal Church is now tolerating the notion of removing celibacy, acceptance of homosexuality, and women deacons/women priests. They are tolerating upending Church teachings and practices.

Toleration, inclusion, “mercy above all else” and false compassion” can potentially become slippery slopes to confusion, heresy, and sin.

Why is it that Vatican allows SSPX bishop appointments in China but not with the SSPX organization itself? Can you say hypocrisy?

Bishop Eleganti: The Church is suffering internal schism because pope, bishops “tolerate” heresies. Heresies are no longer identified and punished in the Catholic Church today.

Quotes on tolerance by Archbishop Fulton Sheen:

“Tolerance is an attitude of reasoned patience toward evil. Tolerance applies only to persons… never to truth.”

“It is up to you, the laity, to remind our priests to be priests and our bishops to be bishops.” (These are the many times when the laity are calling upon the silent and cowardly clergy to speak out about grave issues.)

“Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.” Archbishop Charles Chaput

“The equal toleration of all religions is the same as atheism.” Pope Leo XIII   (This is a very timely comment on the Synodal Church.)

“THE WORST KIND OF HERETIC IS THE ONE, WHILE TEACHING MOSTLY TRUE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, ADDS A WORD OF HERESY, LIKE A DROP OF POISON IN THE WATER.” Pope Leo XIII  (This is also a very timely comment on the Synodal Church.)

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-leo-xiv-claims-leo-xiii-as-early-champion-of-ecumenism/?utm_source=twittercath

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/bishop-eleganti-the-church-is-suffering-internal-schism-because-pope-bishops-tolerate-heresies/?utm_source=digest-catholic-2026-02-03

[Greek] ἀπάτη (apatē), [Latin] deceptio, [Latin] seductio, [Latin] fallacia, [Latin] error: deception, delusion, deceit, enticement, illusion; Mt. 13:22, Mk.4:19, Eph.4:22, Col.2:8, 2Thess.2:10, Heb.3:13, 2Pet.2:13

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means delusion, fraud, deceit, treachery, and cheating.

Polybius’ Histories 2.56.12: “The power of carrying an audience is the chief excellence, because the object is to create illusion.”

Sophocles’ Oedipus at Colonus 230: “Deceit on the one part matches on the other, and gives pain instead of pleasure for reward.”

Sophocles’ Antigone 617: “The deception comes to one who is wholly unware until he burns his foot on a hot fire.”

Antiphon’s On The Choreutes 6.7: “They have in fact treated their speech for the prosecution as nothing but an opportunity for malicious falsehood.”

Sophocles’ Philoctetes 929: “What treachery you have done to me! How thoroughly you have deceived me!”

Greek mythology: Apate is the Greek goddess of deceit, fraud, trickery, deception, and guile. The corresponding Roman goddess is Fraus.

New Testament: This term means lure, deceit, and seduction. For the purposes of brevity, I will exclude the Parable of the Sower.

Eph.4:22: Put away the old self of your former way of life, corrupted through deceitful desires. (Paul was alluding to the Ephesians’ former self lifestyle which engaged in paganism, worldliness, and sin. This results in darkened understanding [in moral truths], alienation from God, ignorance, hardness of heart, callousness, and licentiousness.)

Col. 2:8: “See to it that no one captivate you with an empty, seductive philosophy, according to human tradition, according to elemental powers of the world.”

Seductive philosophies (human traditions): human wisdom (deceit) and knowledge, lived experiences, “making a better world”, worldliness, and syncretism (mixture of faith and worldly values, paganism, and sin)

Christianity: Christianity is not a philosophy, but a life of a personal knowledge of faith and love of God in Christ

Heb. 3:13: “Encourage yourselves daily while it is still “today”, so that you may not grow hardened by the deceit of sin.”

Grow hardened (in mind, conscience, and heart):

1. Become less sensitive and receptive to understanding moral issues
2. Become blinded by sin (by Satan)
3. Become adverse to the gospel message
4. Become prideful (not humble)
5. Become rebellious with unbelief

2 Pet.2:13: “[False teachers] suffering wrong as payment for wrongdoing. Thinking daytime revelry a delight, they are stains and defilements as they revel in the deceits while carousing with you.”

False teachers denounced:

1. Impure seducers and their abandoned followers give themselves to their fleshy impulses.
2. They show contempt for obedience of Christ and righteous precepts.
3. They despise those in authority [sent by God] who seek to correct them.
4. They seduce unstable people.
5. They have abandoned the straight road, for they have gone astray.
6. They have followed the path of Balaam, who loved payment for wrongdoing.
7. In their destruction they will also be destroyed.

[Greek] ἐξαπατάω (exapataō): [Latin] seducere:

Jas.1:26: “If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, his religion is vain.” (The tongue can defile with unkindness, untruth, wickedness, malice, slander, pride, rebellion, heresy, and blasphemy. If he does not restrain his tongue, his evidence of religion is in vain.) 

Rom.16:18: “For such people do not serve our Lord Christ but their own appetites, and by fair and flattering speech they deceive the hearts of the innocent.” (Paul warns others to avoid those who create dissensions and obstacles to the faith. These people seek their own agenda. Paul warns others to be aware of what is good and evil.)

1Cor.3:18: “Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you considers himself wise in this age, let him becomes a fool so as to become wise.” (The wisdom of this world is foolish to the “eyes” of God. If the Corinthians were genuinely wise, they would reverse their perceptions.)

1Tim.2:14: “Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and transgressed.” (The serpent used trickery to deceive Eve. Yet, Adam failing to protect or help Eve, is also culpable.)

Mt.16:22-23: “Peter took Jesus aside and began to rebuke Him, ‘God forbid, Lord! No such thing shall ever happen to you. Jesus turned to Peter and said, ‘Get behind Me, Satan! You are an obstacle to Me. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.”

Peter’ confession about Jesus:

1. Jesus tells the disciples that the Son of Man must suffer greatly, be rejected, be killed, and rise after three days.
2. Peter took Jesus aside and rebuked Him.
3. At first glance, this sounds like a reasonable reaction from Peter. Peter was concerned about Jesus’ welfare.
4. Jesus rebuked Peter and said, “Get behind Me, Satan. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.
5. However, in Peter’s seemingly “reasonable response”, Peter was briefly Satanically inspired to UNDERMINE Jesus’ mission to redeem humanity.
6. Satan seeks to undermine God, God’s creation, God’s laws, and His Church.

What does Satan seek to accomplish?

1. Satan seeks to undermine Church teachings, social precepts (morals), social institutions, and people.
2. Satan is all in for creating and fostering divisions, heresies, schism, confusion, and affirming and encouraging sin in the Church.
3. [Paul]: Where there is evil in the Church, there is the devil.
4. One does not need to full-blown possessed to be influenced by the devil. Satan can subtly influence one through distractedness, weakness, busyness, and preying upon our weaknesses and vulnerabilities.
5. One must not forget that the world and worldly values are part of earthly domain of the devil.
6. Those who are most caught up in sin are the most potentially vulnerable to the devil’s influence.
7. At Vatican II, Pope Paul VI mention that the “smoke of Satan” (spirit of undermining, division, and undermining) has entered into the Church.

Deceptions about Vatican II:

In contrast to what Vatican II actually stated, the Modernists deceptively now claim that the Traditional Latin Mass is not compatible with Church ecclesiology. These Modernists claim that having both the TLM and Novus Order Mass is “divisive”.

More deception about the Church:

1. Cardinal Roche: “The Church’s ecclesiology has changed. The Traditional Latin must go way. (The cardinal, illustrating his animosity toward the TLM, makes this statement as the TLM, where allowed, continues to thrive.)
2. Cardinal Cupich: “The Traditional Latin Mass impoverishes the Church.” (The NO Mass continues to be sparsely attended. The younger generations of priests and laity continue to be attracted to Tradition.)
3. Cardinal Cupich: “Again, as in keeping with his predecessor St. Pope Pius V, there must be only one rite as as a means of preserving the unity of the Church.” (The cardinals makes this statement as the Traditiones Custodes continues to marginalize the faithful, causing more division in the Church.)
4. Creating a new more appealing Novus Order Mass at Vatican II: Pope Paul VI worked with a commission of Protestants theologians to make a Mass more appealing to Protestants, creating at Novus Order mass which is more focused on a community meal. This is contrast to the TLM which is more focused on the sacrifice.)

Cardinal Woelki, Archbishop of Cologne calls it quits with the diabolical German Synodal Way

Why is the German Synodal Way diabolical?

1. The German Synodal Conference provides a process for permanent decision making.
2. Cardinal Woelki fears this process seeks to undermine the safeguarding of the faith and communion with the universal Church.
3. This process raises serious doctrinal and ecclesiological doubts.
4. Cardinal Woelki insisted that synodality must not be defined as a voting process on doctrinal issues.
5. The German Synodal Way seeks to change or redefine the Church’s position on sexual morality, priesthood, celibacy, local authority, and the role of women.
6. The “smoke of Satan” is the spirit of undermining, division, and rebellion.

Conclusion:

Deceive, deception, seduction, seductive, fallacy, error

Update: Rather than upholding and celebrating Mary as “Co-Redemptrix” and “Mediatrix of All Graces”, the Vatican seeking to curry favor with the Protestants’ belief that this “improperly elevates” Mary’s status. (The Vatican is now say that it is improper to use these titles for Mary.)

Pope Leo, continuing to promote Synodality, deceptively states that Vatican II is the guiding star of the Church. In actuality, Vatican II has become a spiritual and pastoral disaster for the Church. “Jesus Christ is the guiding star of the Church.” Archbishop Athanasius Schneider

Abortion rights and contraception continue to be viewed as rights. The reality is that these practices kill the baby and prevent conception.

Like the Ephesians, many of us have become like little pagans bowing down to our gods. Such gods include smartphones, fame, fortune, celebrity, wealth, and likes. Many of us are literally bowing down to our electronic devices.

Many young people, tired of the shallowness, emptiness, and counterfeits that the world offers, are seeking God and entering into the Catholic Church.

Synodality, continuing what Vatican II started, seeks to become a worldly and “listening” Church which seeks to MAKE A BETTER WORLD/SEEK FAVOR WITH THE WORLD, undermining and ignoring Jesus’ command to make disciples of all nations.

Synodality to create a listening Church where clergy and laity share decision making authority in Church doctrine and Church teachings. This is dangerous in undermining or changing establish Church doctrine and objective moral truths.

The Vatican’ efforts to seek tolerance, inclusion, false compassion, and pay lip service to Church teachings for the LGBTQ community undermines Church teachings against homosexuality.

We have too many bishops who feel emboldened in their efforts to continually remove the popular TLM. Their Modernist and Synodality ideology continue to take precedence over the laity’s needs and desires.

Pro-LGBT bishops: “You do not need to follow the Church’s teachings against homosexuality” or [fill in the blank for some questionable practice]. This sounds like Satan speaking to Adam and Eve in the garden.

Renewal and reform ===>growth. In contrast, the German Synodal Church continues to “renew” and “reform” itself into decline and heresy. This is the great warning signs of Synodality!

TRADITION IS TRUE REFORM AND RENEWAL. This is how the Church will grow and restore itself.

“The underlying principle of all of Satan’s tactics is deception. He is a crafty and clever camouflager.” Billy Graham

“The devil is capable of confusing the most brilliant mind.” St. Padre Pio

“Hell can’t be made attractive, so the devil makes attractive the road that leads there.” St. Basil

“The devil tempts that he may ruin, God tests that He may crown.” St. Ambrose

https://infovaticana.com/en/2026/01/27/woelki-for-me-the-synodal-way-is-closed/

[Greek] διακρίνω (diakrinō), [Latin] discernere,  [Latin] dijudicare, [Latin] ostendere,  [Latin] haesitare, [Latin] dubitare, [Latin] advertere, [Latin] iudicare: to judge, to evaluate, to distinguish, to discern, to separate, to discriminate, to make a distinction; 24 scriptures

Yet, many of us (both clergy and laity) continue with the mindset that “we know better”.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to separate, to part, to join others, to set apart, to distinguish, to decide, to consult (the birds), to doubt, to hesitate, and to waver.

Homer’s Odyssey 8.195: “Even, a blind man could distinguish this mark, groping it with his hands.”

Herodotus’ The Histories 1.11: “Now, Gyges, you have two ways before you decide which you will follow.”

Aristophanes’ Birds 719: “Before undertaking anything, you consult the birds by reading the omens, and you give this name of omen to all signs that tell of the future.”

Plato’s Philebus 46b: “Protarchus, we can probably never settle the point at issue.”

Old Testament: This term means to judge, to examine, to litigate, to separate, to distinguish, to willfully reject, to contend, to choose, and to litigate.

New Testament: This term means to judge, to doubt (waver), to confront, to discriminate, to distinguish, distinction, and to discern. Sometimes it is often difficult to make the “distinction” between these meanings. ☺☺☺

Mt.21:21-22: “Jesus said to them in reply, ‘Amen, I say to you, if you have faith and do not waver [doubt], not only will you do what has been done to the fig tree, but even if you say to this mountain, ‘Be lifted up and thrown into the sea’, it will be done.” (The cursing of the fig tree represents hypocrisy. The fig tree represents the Jewish people’s blindness and hard-heartedness. If you have faith, you should be able to perform much more difficult things.)

Acts 11:12: “The Spirit told me [Peter] to accompany them without discriminating. These six brother also went with me, and we entered the man’s house.” (The Holy Spirit inspired Peter to set aside the legal barriers between the Jews and Gentiles. This was an indication that the gospel message was also to be given to the Gentiles.)

1Cor.4:6-7: “So that you may learn from us [Paul and Apollos] not to go beyond what is written, so that you may not be inflated with pride. Who confers distinction (knowing better) upon you? What do you possess that you have not received?” (Paul warns the Corinthians to avoid the false wisdom of vain speculation and puffed up arrogance. Paul asks who has conferred this distinction upon the Corinthians. Why are the Corinthians boasting?)

1Cor.11:29: “For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself.” (Improperly eating and drinking the Body and Blood of the Lord unworthily (without discernment) will bring upon judgment upon oneself. One must understand the meaning of Jesus’ intentions and His death. To do otherwise, one will be guilty of a sin against the Lord Himself.)

Acts 10:19-20: “The Spirit said to Peter, ‘So get up, do downstairs, and accompany [the three men here looking for you] without hesitation, because I have sent them.'” (Being of a divided mind, Peter was doubtful and uncertain. The vision was intended to prepare Peter to admit Gentiles, who were considered unclean, into the Christian community.) 

Mt.16:3: “You [Pharisees and Sadducees] know how to judge the appearance of the sky, but you cannot judge the sign of the times.” (Jesus criticizes them for not understanding the indications of the coming kingdom in the signs of Jesus. Evil and unfaithful generations, breaking the covenantal relationship with God, engage in the sign of the times SPIRITUAL ADULTERY.** They demand a sign.)

**Modern day spiritual harlotry of the Church having further “intercourse” with worldly values, other faiths, paganism, and sin in the Church:

1. Overlooking, ignoring, and paying lip service to Church teachings (This essentially becomes practical atheism.) 
2. Overlooking, ignoring, de-stigmatizing, and blessing sin
3. Clergy being marginalized, deposed, removed, laicized, and criticized for stating Traditional Church teachings.
4. Lived experiences, inclusion, and tolerance TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER Church teachings. This is Synodality becoming an IDOL!
5. Synod of Synodalities: having non-Christians and non-believers involved in the synodal process. This sounds like further Protestantizing and secularizing the Church!
6. Inserting worldly and pagan influences in the Mass. (pagan idols, indigenous dance rituals, environmental art installations inside the Church)
7. Using a moral and cultural appropriation of a DIFFERENT “Holy Spirit of Surprises” to justify and rationalize anything you want. This is very deceitful and dangerous in that the Holy Spirit can only stand for truth!
8. Undermining the Church structure: having poorly catechized and sinful laity determining and deciding Church doctrine
9. Having inverted priorities: focusing more on “making a better world” rather than on bringing souls into heaven.
10. Vatican II: Bringing in “fresh air [worldliness]” so that the Church “can get with the times.”  How is that working out for the Church?
11. Vatican II: Bringing in the “smoke of Satan [spirit of undermining and rebellion] into the Church. Changing and twisting Church doctrine and teachings under the guise of tolerance, inclusion, false compassion, and confusion.
12. Synodality seeks to continue what Vatican started to become a worldly Church more focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.
13. Vatican II: Pope Paul VI formed a commission with Protestant theologians to create a Novus Order Mass with the focus more on the community meal (rather than the Sacrifice). Let that sink in!
14. The German Synodal Church continues to “renew” and “reform” itself into decline and heresy.

Discerning the priesthood, fatherhood, and celibacy:

1. Fr. Chad Ripperger: “The collapse of fatherhood is due to men. Women have been allowed to take positions for which God never intended them. Men allowed women to pursue a feminist mentality.” (This is how we get to the idea of having women priests and women deacons. This becomes a right rather than a vocation.)
2. Archbishop Kwofie of Ghana warned about the growing influence of homosexuality an gay culture in the Catholic seminaries in West Africa. (This illustrates the lack of the importance of celibacy).
3. The German Synodal bishops seek to question celibacy and seek to allow homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle.
4. The younger generations of priest continue to hold to the traditional role of the priest. (Celibacy and no homosexuality)
5. Fr. Joachim Heirml states that the Vatican hierarchy is being led by older homosexual priests. What better to undermine celibacy with having a homosexual lifestyle.
6. Pope Leo degrades African bishop who defended celibacy. This archbishop was accused of being authoritarian.
7. Belgium Bishop Johan Bonny wrote a pastoral letter than included a plan to ordain married men into the priesthood by 2028. This topic was also talked about in the Vatican’s Synod of Synodality. Let that sink in!

Making the distinction between the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship:

1. This amendment states that all persons born here subject this country’s jurisdiction are citizens.
2. This amendment was meant to make black slaves become citizens, being subject to the United States.
3. One’s allegiance has to be to one’s country and flag.
4. This amendment does not include U.S. born persons who are foreigners, aliens, and who belong to families of other nations’ ambassadors and ministers.
5.  This does not apply to those who can obtain citizenship in other nations.
6. Countries and companies involved with “birth tourism” (having babies born in the US) will seek to use this a legal loophole and mockery of US citizenship.
7. Illegal immigrants who seek have to children born in the US will also seek to use this as a loophole for seeking US citizenship.
8. Illegal immigrants continue to have allegiance to their own origin countries, not allegiance to the US.
9. One’s subjection to a country does not always presume one’s allegiance to a country.

Conclusion:

Dijudicate, discern, discerning, decide, decision, ostentation, monstrance, separate, separation, hesitation, hesitate, distinguish, doubt, dubious, turn, advertise, condemn, judge

In the Old Testament, the focus was on rejection of God’s word rather than on doubt.

Update: It seems that Pope Leo XIV will continue to follow the path of the Modernists and Synodalists on worldly concerns. (Ex. Mass on the Care for Creation, supporting Laudato  Si). They are focusing more on “making a better world” rather than on bringing souls to heaven.

A priest in Trevelez, Granada Spain, was rebuked and forced into hiding for praying for those who don’t go to Mass and for stating the LGBT community need conversion. This priest was called racist and homophobic. Unlike the others, THIS PRIEST UNDERSTANDS THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES. Being rebuked for stating traditional Church teachings: sounds like Bishop Strickland.

Pope Pius X’s encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis prophetically warned that the the Modernists would reduce Church doctrine and teaching to one’s lived experiences, perceptions, and sentiments.

It is also very apparent that there is really no distinction between Modernism and Synodality. Synodality is seeking to redefine the Church into man’s image and lived experiences.

Sacrilegious discernment: St. Mary’s Cathedral in North Yorkshire, England permitted a rock concert in their church. The performer played in front of the altar, Tabernacle, and crucifix.

Lackadaisical Eucharistic reception, liturgical abuses (and sacrilege), lack of belief (in the Eucharist), and being in a state of mortal sin all play a part in receiving the Eucharist unworthily. 

There are unfortunately too many empowered bishops who are clamping down on the Traditional Latin Mass. These bishops are no different from arrogant Pharisees acting against the wishes of the faithful.

Politicizing the Gospel: The bishop of the diocese of San Bernadino has arrogantly dispensed parishioners from attending Sunday Mass in light of ICE activity. The Church, willingly accepting money in promoting illegal immigration, now finds itself in political opposition to the U.S. government. Many immigrations are in the country illegally.

This Synodal Church is now entrenched in political issues (immigration rights) and power struggles (women seeking the “right” to be priests and deacons).

In this Catholic rejuvenation

1. Many Protestants, being inspired by the Holy Spirit, are entering into the Church.
2. Lax cradle Catholics often leave the Church.
3. This inevitably creates a more faithful Catholic Church.

“This new way of being Church [Synodality]: is a betrayal of Jesus Christ and the Church He established.” Bishop Strickland.

*”Moral principles do not depend on a majority vote. Wrong is wrong even if everybody is wrong. Right is right, even if nobody is right.” Archbishop Fulton Sheen

“All novelty [human tradition] in faith is a sure mark of heresy.” St. Vincent of Lerins

[Greek] ἐνέχω (enechō), [Latin] insidiare, [Latin] iugare, [French] joinder: to hold (a grudge), to be hostile towards, to be under control; Mk. 6:19, Lk.11:53, Gal.5:1

St. Augustine makes reference to how one can become a slave (being held captive) to sin or addicted to some vice.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to hold fast, to harbor a grudge, to be entangled, to be caught, to pierce, to be seized with wonder, to be liable, and to come to a standstill.

Epictetus: “If someone succeeds in provoking you, realize that your mind is complicit in this provocation.” (Sounds like [fill in the name] Derangement Syndrome)!

Plato’s Leches 183e: “As he was fighting, his scythe fixed to his spear somehow stuck into the ship’s rigging, holding fast.”

Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis 527: “True, he is enslaved by the love of popularity, a fearful evil.”

Herodotus’ The Histories 7.128: “Great wonder took him when he came and viewed the mouth of the Penesu rivers.”

Plato’s Laws 9.881d: “He that fails to drive him off shall be liable by law to the curse of Zeus.”

Old Testament: This term means to pursue, to be entangled, to be guilty, to keep close, and to shut up.

New Testament: This term means to hold a grudge, to be hostile, and to be under the control of.

Mk.6:19: “Herodias harbored a grudge against him [John the Baptist] and wanted to kill him but was unable to do so.” (Herod imprisoned John the Baptist because he feared that his influence over the people might lead to a rebellion. Yet Herod, knowing that John the Baptist was a righteous and holy, liked to listen to him.)

Lk.11:53: “When He left, the scribes and Pharisees began to act with hostility toward Him and to interrogate Him about many things.” Jesus denounced them because:

Pharisees:

1. They focus on external cleaning rituals.
2. They are filled inside with hate and plunder.
3. They pay tithes of mint and rue, yet they pay no attention to judgment and love of God.
4. They seek honor in the synagogues and marketplaces, yet are like unseen graves (outward piety masking inward impurity).

Scholars:

1. They impose hard burdens others, yet do not help them.
2. They build memorials of prophets whom their ancestors killed, yet they bear witness and consent to their ancestors.
3. They take away the key of knowledge and block others who seek it.

Gal.5:1: “For freedom Christ set us free; so stand firm and do not submit again to the yoke of slavery.” (Paul points out that one continues under the yoke of slavery under the law and circumcision.)

New Testament concept of freedom: Man attains self-control by letting himself be controlled by God. God provides a true liberation (freedom) from a deficient existence. (Talk about a profound contradiction!! ONE BECOMES TOTALLY FREE BY BEING CONTROLLED BY GOD! This sounds life following God’s will.) #GodIsInControl  #Mindblown

Modern concept of freedom: “I can do anything I want!” This notion of freedom can often result in being enslaved or addicted to some sinful activity or overindulgence. This can become a false sense of freedom.

Modernists’ and Synodalists’ contempt (holding a grudge) against Tradition:

1. At the 2026 Consistory, Cardinal Roche sent a letter [in his efforts to remove the TLM] to the Cardinals. Other empowered bishops continue to invoke Traditiones Custodes.
2. Holding to the status quo: the Cardinals at the 2026 Consistory did not hold any discussion about the liturgy and TLM. The focus was more on Synodality. Shocker!
3. Bishop Athanasius Schneider has criticized the Vatican II for holding up doctrinal and and confusion.
4. Bishop Athanasius Schneider has criticized Pope Leo for hold up Vatican II as “the guiding star” of the Church. In actuality, Vatican II has become a great pastoral and spiritual disaster for the Church.
5. Rather than embracing Tradition, Synodality holds on the the idea of a worldly Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences. This is contrary to Jesus’ intentions for His Church.
6. The Brazilian archbishop Carlos Perira declares excommunication for unauthorized Latin Mass attendance. He claims that this constitutes “public schism” under can law??
7. Cardinal Zen said that conscience must be respected between the Vatican and SSPX, arguing that the SSPX should not be compelled to accept teaching contrary to Tradition.
8. Cardinal Zen: “The Novus Order did not respect the intentions of the conciliar fathers.” Pope Paul VI worked with Protestant theologians to create the NO Mass!
9. Pope Leo degraded (demoted) African bishop Gneba for promoting a pastoral directive for priests to maintain high moral standards

Overcoming the modern Church practices causing confusion for the Novus Order Mass: [Traditional vs. Modern perspectives on altar servers:

1. The Synodal Church is now seeking to further redefine the priesthood by making the priesthood more worldly ===> making the priesthood LESS SEPARATE FROM THE WORLD! ===> creating more confusion for a young man considering the priesthood.
2. How is a young boy ever going to consider a priestly vocation when he sees an altar girl at Mass?
3. How is it helpful that a young girl, seeking to become an altar girl at Mass, will have her hopes crushed realizing that she cannot become a priest. This cannot be possible in that the male priest represents the male Christ.
4. Tradition: males and females each have their own unique dignity and vocation in the Church.
5. Since Vatican II and Synodality: male and females roles in the Church have become blurred. Now we have “girl altar boys”, continued talk of women deacons and woman priests. (This is part Synodality’s intention to redefine the Church in the image of man (and woman) and their lived experiences. (not by Jesus’ intentions.)

Modern concept of freedom: “I can do anything I want!” This notion of freedom can often result in being enslaved or addicted to some sinful activity or overindulgence. This can become a false sense of freedom.

Etymology:

1. The Greek verb enecho means to hold (-echo) upon (en-).
2. The Latin verb insidiare means to sit upon (lying in wait).
3. Insidious means deceitful, cunning, and treacherous.
4. The Latin verb iugare means to join or to marry.
5. The Latin noun iugum means yoke. A yoke is a wooden frame fastened on an ox for plowing or pulling.
6. To yoke means to join and to unite.

Conclusion:

Insidious, join, enjoin, yoke subjugate, conjugate

The Greek philosopher Epictetus foresaw the psychological notion of a person “living rent-free” in someone’s mind.

Update: Many continue today to have TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome). Democrats would rather not call Iran a sponsor of terrorism rather than give Trump credit for his actions against Iran.

Modern understanding of reform and renewal:

1. It was naively thought that the Church needed to get with the world “so that the Church can get with the times”: bringing in worldliness and “smoke of Satan” brings more problems in the Church.
2. Synodality: we need to continue what Vatican II started (to reform and renew the Church). This actually creates more and more problems for the Church.
3. Synodal “reform” and “renewal” ===> creates more problems in the Church ===> [what is the response to this?] ===> more “reform” and “renewal” ===> still more problems in the Church ====> [rinse and repeat]
4. German Synodal Church: The German Church is “reforming” and “renewing” itself into decline and heresy. (This a great warning sign of things to come with Synodality!)
5. Modernists and Synodalists: their ideology will take precedence over acknowledging the reality that Tradition will be more effective in truly reforming and renewing the Church.

Traditional understanding of reform and renewal:

1. Tradition provides TRUE REFORM and TRUE RENEWAL.
2. The younger generations (clergy and laity) are attracted to doctrinal clarity and Church teachings.
3. The TLM is thriving (where allowed).
4. True reform and renewal begins when the Magisterium remains separate from the world.
5. Lefebvre: “Our [Church] future is in our past [moving back to Tradition is TRUE REFORM and TRUE RENEWAL].

It can be said that many of us may be enslaved or addicted to notoriety, fame, likes, narcissism, social media, wealth, sweets, and sinful activity.

We often anecdotally hear of those certain people who have may sold their soul to the devil for worldly acclaim. This perhaps happen more than we realize.

Sanctuary city madness: we are constantly seeing protesters (citizens, politicians, and politicians) obstructing ICE’s efforts to remove illegals and criminals from these cities. They are protesting against removing criminals from the cities.

Many abortion supporters are still resentful now that Roe vs. Wade has been overturned at the federal level. There is no longer a federal right to have an abortion. They are saying, “how dare they take this right to kill my baby away from me.”!

“It is the part of a wise man to resist pleasures, but of a foolish man to be a slave to them.” Epictetus

“If you wish, you can become a slave of passions, and if you wish, you can remain free and not submit to their yoke, for God has created you with that power.” St. Anthony the Great

“Hanging onto resentment is letting someone you despise live rent-free in your head.” Ann Landers

“For it is a master stroke of Satan to get Catholics to disobey [and become hostile to] the whole of Tradition in the name of obedience.” Archbishop Lefebvre

1. Many Catholics are now led to believe that Tradition is “rigid”.
2. Ironically, the SSPX has become called “schismatic” for following Traditional practices.
3. Traditional and conservatively minded clergy and laity and now being marginalized by the Modernist and Synodality clergy.
4. Empowered clergy are seeking to remove the TLM because it is “divisive” to have two different liturgical practices.
5. The irony is rich in that the Novus Order Mass was created by a partnerships with Pope Paul VI and Protestant theologians. Let that sink in!

[Greek] στοιχέω (stoicheō), [Latin] ambulare, [Latin] sequere, [French] marcher, [French] voyager: to walk, to follow, to be stoic, to conform to, to adhere to a standard, to imitate, to behave; Acts 21:24, Rom.4:12, Gal.5:25, Gal.6:16, Php.3:16

The theme of 2026 March for Life is “Life is a gift.”  This picture is from March of Life 2025

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to be in sequence, to correspond, to be in line with, to come to an agreement, and to assent to.

Xenophon’s Cyropaedia 6.3.34: “You officers of the chariots, one shall take its place in line upon the right flank of the army, the other on the left, and follow the phalanx each in a single file.”

Polybius’ Histories 2: “I will now relate the events which succeed these, touching upon summarily upon each in accordance with my original plan.”

Xenophon’s On the Calvery 5.7: “If the whole of the ground is exposed, you must form the files into rows and wheel, leaving a gap between each row.”

Stoicism:

1. This Hellenistic philosophy was heavily influenced by certain teachings of Socrates.
2. Stoicism gets its name from the heavily fortified stoa (covered walkway or portico) in Athens.
3. It is here where the the followers gathered to learn these teachings. Stoicism is predominately a philosophy of person ethics.
4. Men must accept the moment as it presents itself.
5. Men also must not let himself become overcome by his desires or fears.
6. One must understand the rules of the natural order.

Old Testament: This term, rarely used, means to be straight, to be right, to be acceptable, to succeed, and to prosper.

1. The image of walking with God is quite often associated with a code of conduct and adherence to rule (laws) in accordance with God.
2. This essentially means walking on the right path.
3. This idea becomes later important to the Jews of the Diaspora who sought to maintain their faith in foreign lands.

New Testament: This term means to behave or to imitate.

1. Not surprisingly, this term continues the Old Testament imagery of walking.
2. This sense of walking is conveyed by agreement with someone, in being in step with, and in following someone.
3. Such illustrations include observing the Law (and customs), following Abraham’s path, following the Spirit, conforming to the cross of Jesus, and continuing the same course.

Scripture:

Rom.4:12: “But also follow the path of faith that our father Abraham walked while still uncircumcised.” (Abraham walked with God in faith. Abraham was justified by faith. Abraham’s faith involved receipt of the forgiveness of sins. All who believes benefit as he did through faith.)

Acts 12:24: “Take these men and purify yourself with them, and pay their expenses that they may have their heads shaved. In this way everyone will know that there is nothing to the reports they have been given about you but that you yourself live in observance of the law.” (These actions can indicate observance of the law. Walking orderly means keeping the law.)

Gal.5:25: “If we live in the Spirit, let us also follow the Spirit.” (This involves walking in faith in accordance with the Spirit.)

Php.3:16: “Only, with regard to what we have attained, continue on the same course.” (Paul states that being taken possession of Christ means having trust and faith in God. Paul calls upon each of us to continue on this course.) 

Gal.6:16: “Peace and mercy be to all who follow this rule and to the Israel of God.” (Relying on the imagery of a carpenter’s tool, Paul makes reference to relying on the rule (canon) of scripture. Paul makes reference to the spiritual Israel who follow the promises of Abraham.)

[Greek] συνοδεύω (synodeuō): to journey with, to accompany with

Bishop Barron’s warnings about Synodality:

1. Synods are good and useful tools for the determination of practical pastoral strategies, but they ought NOT be forums for debate regarding doctrine.
2. When settled teachings becomes a subject for synodal determination, the Church devolves into relativism and self-doubt.
3. The German Synodal Church is an example of the misconceived application of Synodality.
4. It is the perpetuation of the spirit of Vatican II that led to so much vacillation and drift.
5. Synodality must NOT be a defining and permanent feature of the Church’s life.

What are the pitfalls and consequences of Synodality?

1. Lived experiences (tolerance, inclusion, and false compassion) make take precedence over Church teachings.  This is where Synodality becomes an IDOL.
2. The German Church continues to “reform” and “renew” itself into decline and heresy. This is a great warning sign for Synodality.
3. Church doctrine and Church teachings may often be decided by clergy, laity, and non Catholics.
4. In the Synodal Church, religion is now being defined by one’s religious sentiments and lived experiences.
5. Being a “listening Church” focuses MORE on what the people want rather than with Church doctrine and objective moral truths.

Conclusion:

Stoic, stoa, ambulance, sequence, voyage, voyager, march

Stoicism declined when Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire. There are some admirable principles of Stoicism: wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance. The modern-day version is the military expression: “Embrace the suck”.

The Old Testament develops the important notion of walking with God with a code of conduct and adherence to the law. The Jews were confronted with either keeping their Jewish traditions or with following the new path of Christianity.

Yet other groups (God-fearers) followed a hybrid mixture of Jewish and Christian beliefs.

Update: The birth of Christ: the greatest pro-life story ever told!

The Modernists & Synodalists are creating a new “listening” synodal Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences.  

Bishop Barron provides timeless wisdom of the consequences of go too far with Synodality.

Pope Francis and some of his other Modernists (Cardinal Roche) have even claimed that Church’s ecclesiology has changed. They are now creating a new Church.

Now that Roe vs. Wade was turned over, efforts to fight against abortion must continue at the state level.

Rather than adhering to God’s laws, the Vatican continues to introduce human traditions and novelties.

Many Catholics and Christians have walked together in support of the Pro-life movement in this post-Roe era.

Now it is incumbent for all supporters to attempt to change the hearts and minds of others (legislators, leaders, private citizens, etc.) about the evils of abortion.

Secular attitudes emphasizing women’s ‘rights’ (“reproductive freedom”, “this is my body, etc.”) to the exclusion of everything else continue to provide obstacles for personal conversion.

Catholics and Christians are continually deemed as “hateful” and “extreme” by many in our culture. If Catholics and Catholic get their beliefs from God, then is God also hateful and extreme?

In the secular media, “pro-life” must be redefined as “anti-abortion.” (The opposition must not be called “pro-life because then they would be called “anti-life”! You will also quite frequently notice “anti-abortion” rather than “pro-life” in newspaper articles. This is a perfect illustration of verbal gymnastics!)

The Republican Party must also must to do a better job in changing their opponents’ hearts and minds. Oftentimes, the Republicans’ efforts may often trigger a violent counter-reaction from their pro-choice opponents ==>increased support for abortion rights. 

The Catholic bishops must continue to be engaged in catechesis about the moral issues of abortion.

The National Archives was forced to pay thousands to Pro-Life students after forcing them to remove their Pro-Life shirts.

The March for Life 2026 event is this Friday Jan. 23 this week.

“Killing babies is an intrinsic evil” Pope Benedict XVI

Have a good walk (in faith)

[Greek] ἀφορίζω (aphorizō), [Latin] separare, [Latin] segregare, [French] isoler: to separate, to exclude, to appoint, to set apart; Mt.13:49, Mt.25:32, Lk.6:22, Acts 13:2, Acts 19:9, Rom.1:1, 2Cor.6:17, Gal.1:15, Gal.2:12

Ever since Vatican II (and with Synodality), the Church has become more focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than on BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN and MAKING DISCIPLES OF ALL NATIONS.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to mark off, to establish, to border on, to define, to separate, to exclude, to bring to an and, and to banish.

Isocrates’ To Phillip 5.120: “What opinion must we expect the world will have if you actually do this undertaking to establish cities in this region.”

Plato’s Timaeus 24a: “You see how the priestly class is separated from the rest: craftsmen, shepherds, and farmers, each distinguished and separate.”

Plato’s Greater Hippias 298d: “Did you make the distinction that in the category of the pleasing that which is beautiful, whereas, you say that that which is pleasing according to other senses.”

Old Testament: This term means to separate, to divide, and to cleave. Israel is separated from the world. The lepers, unclean, and the unholy are to be separated from the community. The Levites are to be a separated priesthood.

New Testament: This term means to separate, to disperse, to exclude, and to set apart.

Mt.25:32: “The Son of Man will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.” (The criterion of judgment is ultimately the acceptance or rejection of Jesus. The Son of Man will sit on His glorious throne and assemble all the nations [Gentiles and Jews] before Him. The criterion of judgment will be deeds of mercy.)

Lk.6:22: “Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude and insult you, and denounce your name as evil on account of the Son of Man.” (Being excluded: persecution, being deposed, being marginalized, and being excommunicated. Being insulted: being accused as heretics, apostates, and enemies [to the law or the Jews]. Being denounced as evil: being perceived as hateful and intolerant, being countercultural, and being monsters.)

Acts 19:9: “When some in their obstinacy and disbelief disparaged the Way before the assembly, Paul withdrew and took his disciples with him and began to hold daily discussions in the Tyrannus lecture hall.” (The truth had no impression on their opponents as they were not persuaded by the Way’s message. Therefore, it was necessary for Paul to find another place to hold daily discussions.)

Gal.1:15: “But when God, who from my mother’s womb had set me [Paul] apart and called me through His grace, was pleased to reveal His Son to Me.” (Paul makes reference to revelation, not conversion. This language echoes the Old Testament prophetic call of Jeremiah.) 

Gal.2:12: “Peter used to eat with the Gentiles; but when the Jewish Christians came, Peter began to draw back and separated himself, because he was afraid of the circumcised.” (Because of peer pressure, Peter walked away from the Gentiles. Since Peter’s actions were in public, Paul rebuked Peter in public. The Jerusalem Council recognized the freedom of Gentile Christians from the Jewish law.)

Excluding and ignoring Jesus’ commands to sin no more: (Jn.8:11-12):

1. It is naive to think that this applies ONLY to the adulterous woman. This applies to all of us who sin.
2. Jesus is often presented as being both infinitely merciful and and infinitely tolerable. Jesus associated with sinners but He did NOT tolerate their sinful behavior.
3. Unfortunately, Jn.8:11-12 is rarely mentioned by the Church and clergy. There is NOT enough focus on Jesus’ statements on sin.
4. Clergy who do not mention sin and Jesus’ statements on sin are failing in their duty to properly catechize the faithful.
5. Many clergy do NOT state Church teachings against homosexuality. These clergy are putting many people’s eternal mortal souls in peril.
6. The Church instead focuses more on inclusion, tolerance, false compassion rather than on sin, Jesus’ statements on sin, forgiveness, and conversion of heart.
7. Jn. 8:12: “Whoever follows Me will NOT walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”, in other words, ===> [Whoever does NOT follow Me will walk in darkness].
8. You would think this would be important for “a Synodal Church who supposedly walks with each other.

What did Pope Pius X’s encyclical Pescendi Dominic Gregis (1907) prophetically says about how the Church would separate from Traditional Catholicism?

1. The Modernists (and later Synodalists) seek to commingle objective moral truths (Church teachings) with lived experiences (personal and subjective explanations for religion.) This is called vital immanence.
2. Lived experiences often take precedence over supernatural realities and moral truths.
3. Clergy and laity share Church decision-making authority. This seeks to undermine the structure of the Church.
4. They seek to further separate Church teachings from Tradition. Modernism is a synthesis of all heresies leading to atheism.
5. They seek to transform Jesus’ divine Church (separate from the world) into a worldly synodal Church (made in the image of man and his lived experiences.)

How Vatican II separated from Traditional Catholicism:

1. It was naively believed that the Church needed to bring in “fresh air” so that the Church “could get with the times.”
2. Along with “fresh air [worldliness] came the “smoke of Satan” [spirit of undermining].
3. Human traditions and questionable ecumenical efforts seek to find unity of faith OUTSIDE the Catholic Church.
4. Very questionable human tradition: Pope Paul VI coordinated with Protestant theologians to create a Novus Order Mass with the focus on the community meal (not the sacrifice).
5. Synodality seeks to double down on what Vatican II started: more worldliness and more spirit of undermining.
6. Lived experiences, tolerance, false compassion, inclusion, and equality take precedence over Church teachings, Jesus’ states, sin, forgiveness, and conversion of heart.
7. Warning signs of things to come with Synodality: the German Church is “reforming” and “renewing” itself into decline and heresy.

2026 Consistory: Cardinal Fernandez’s questionable doctrinal statements: “Stop obsessing over doctrines and norms.” [separating out clarity for pastoral renewal]:

1. As the Vatican doctrinal chief, Cardinal Fernandez yet fails in upholding and promoting Catholic doctrine!
2. He seeks to weaken doctrinal integrity, moral clarity, and apostolic continuity under the guise of pastoral renewal. (This is typical for a Synodal theologian.)
3. He states that we mustn’t engage in an “obsessive proclamation of doctrine and norms.” (This is diluting and watering down Church teachings for sake being pastoral.)
4. This presents an emotional appeal that is separate from a call for repentance, conversion, baptism and obedience to apostolic teachings.
5. For the past 60 years, pastoral care, confusion (ambiguity), tolerance, inclusion, false compassion take precedence over moral doctrinal clarity.

2026 Consistory: separating out truth from fiction:

1. Many though that Pope Leo would be different from Pope Francis. (No. Pope Leo continues to follow the Synodal path of Pope Francis.)
2. Many thought that Pope Leo would be more favorably inclined toward Tradition. (More and more empowered bishops implement Traditiones Custodes with Pope Leo’s blessing or tacit silence.)
3. Many thought the TLM would be addressed. (Synodality was the main topic of discussion. The Consistory punted on the TLM. The liturgy was not seen as a priority.)
4. Pope Leo seeks to rediscover the prophetic nature of Vatican II. (Pope Leo seeks to double down and celebrate Vatican II. Let that sink in!)
5. Pope Leo: “The Church grows by attraction, not proselytism.” (NO! The Church grows by sending out and making disciples of all nations.)

John of the Cross warns us to remain SEPARATE FROM THE WORLD:

1. We are called to be temporary earthly sojourners and citizens of heaven. (1Pet.2:11, Php.3:20, Eph.2:19)
2. The Conciliar Church (Vatican II) begins to look more and more like a United Nations NGO.
3. Synodality is remaking Jesus’ Church into a worldly Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences.
4. It seems that both Vatican II and Synodality have lost the plot about what the Church should be.
5. The Church is more focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD rather than on BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN.

Conclusion:

Separate, separation, aphorism, segregate, segregation, isolate, isolation

Antioch becomes the primary center for the Christian community. It is here where the term ‘Christian’ originated.

Update: The diocese of Charlotte is seeking to shut down the TLM to “promote the concord and unity of the Church.” This is greatly opposed by the laity.

In his efforts to restrict the TLM, the bishop of Charlotte intentionally set aside a small isolated venue for the TLM to be celebrated. This is further illustration of this bishop’s efforts to marginalize the faithful.

St. Josephs’ Catholic Church in Indiana, having recently removed the TLM, was forced to close their Church for lack of attendance. Shocker! Bishops, more concerned about promoting their Modernist/Synodalist ideologies, evidently have no problems about marginalizing the faithful or closing churches.

Although Jesus associated with sinners, He did not come to tolerate their sinful behavior. He told them to sin no more. Yet many still believe that Jesus is all about endless tolerance.

It has been said by some that Fiducia Supplicans (offering non-liturgical blessings to same-sex unions) has become a new “mill-stone moment” in the Church for the grave nature of blessing sin (evil.)

A German bishop now claims that homosexuality is part of God’s plan of creation. This is a typical rationalization for clergy who are already living in a homosexual lifestyle and for those who want to remove clerical celibacy.

Separate understandings about Vatican II: Pope Leo continues to celebrate Vatican II. Yet there continues more and more critical examination of the consequences of Vatican II on the Church.

Divine Mercy Sunday: Separate beliefs about Divine Mercy and Sister Faustina’s words. It is fascinating in that we now have supporters and doubters who currently question this practice.

God will also separate those wicked, unfaithful, and clergy who do not properly fulfill their responsibilities to bring souls into heaven. As a result, there will be some priests, clergy, and pastors who may be SEVERELY JUDGED BECAUSE OF THEIR FAILURE TO ACT LIKE PRIESTS, CLERGY, AND PASTORS.

It is important to note that God will remain faithful to those clergy and laity who are persecuted, marginalized, and cancelled in remaining faithful to Him. 

Aphorism: This is a term describing an important truth in a short or pithy sentence.

Aphorisms/Quotes St. Augustine:

“Pray as though everything depended on God. Work as though everything depended on you.” 

“Trust the past to the mercy of God, the present to His love, and the future to His providence.”

“If you believe what you like in the Gospels and reject what you don’t like, it is not the Gospels you believe, but yourself.”

“The cost of obedience is small compared with the cost of disobedience.”

‎[Greek] οἰκουμένη (oikoumenē), [Latin] orbe: world, inhabited earth, all over the world; Lk.4:5, Rom. 10:18, Act.11:28, Act.17:6, Act. 24:5, Lk.2:1, Lk. 21:26, Act. 17:31, Rev.3:10, Rev. 12:9

Oikoumene: The Greek World

Background Information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means inhabited region, Greek world, barbarian lands, the whole world, and Roman world.

Demosthenes’ On the Halonnesus 7.35: “He will not restore your possessions, for he claims them as his own, and his rewards will not be delivered in this part of the world, for fear his motive should be misrepresented to the Greeks; some other country, it seems, new quarter will assigned for the bestowal of your rewards.”

Demosthenes’ On the Crown 18.48: “Since then the whole world has become crowded with men exiled, punished in every conceivable way.”

New Testament: This term means the world, empire, earth, people, humankind, and entire world.

Oikumene: The Roman world

Scripture:

Mt.24:14: “And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the world as a witness to all nations, and then the end will come.” (All the nations refer to the Gentiles. These inhabited lands were more or less consisting of the Roman Empire. The end shall not be until the gospel has done its work.)

Lk.2:1:“In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that the whole world should be enrolled.” (The whole world is Rome, Italy, and the Roman provinces.)

Caesar Augustus’ reign:

1. The reign of Augustus is usually dated from 27 BC to 14 AD.
2. Augustus was regarded as savior, god, and peace-maker (pax Augustus).
3. Luke intentionally defines Jesus as savior, God, and peace-maker in contrast to Augustus.
4. Augustus is simply God’s agent who provides the occasion for God’s purposes to bring Jesus into the world.
5. Joseph, Mary, and Jesus were residents, not refugees, under the Roman Empire.

Lk.4:5: “The devil took Him up and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a single instant.” (The kingdoms of the world are the areas of the world which are inhabited by man. The devil had been granted power and glory of these kingdoms. The devil could give this power to any one he wished.)

Satan’s power and authority in the world:

1. Mt.4:9: Satan will grant these kingdoms of the world if you prostrate and worship him.
2. Jn.12:31: Satan is the ruler (prince) of the world.
3. Eph.2:2: Satan is the ruler of power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the world.
4. Eph.6:12: Principalities, powers, world rulers of present darkness, evil spirits in the heavens.

Acts 17:6: “The Jews shouted, ‘These people [Paul and Silas] have been creating a disturbance all over the world have now come here.'” (In the synagogue in Thessalonica, Paul stated that the Messiah had to suffer and rise from the dead. But the Jews became jealous and gathered a mob in protests. The Jews accused Paul was supporting another king, Jesus, in defiance of the Caesar’s decree.)

Acts 17:31: “[In speaking to the Athenians], Paul states, ‘God has established a day on which He will judge the world with justice through a man He has appointed.'” (Paul acknowledges the Athenians’ religiosity, but states we have a God who does not need to served by human hands but made the whole human race. This God has overlooked the peoples’ ignorance, but now demand that all people repent.)

Acts 19:27: “The danger grows, not only that our business will be discredited, but also that the temple of the great goddess Artemis will be of no account, and all the world worship will be stripped of her magnificence.” (The silversmiths claimed that Paul has ‘misled’ a great number of people by saying that the gods made by hands are not gods at all. Paul was seen as undermining the silversmiths’ paganism and livelihood.)

Acts 24:5: “We found this man [Paul] to be a pest; he creates dissension among the Jews all over the world and is a ringleader of the sect of the Nazoreans.”

Pest: one who corrupts the morals of others, a seditious person, a wicked person

Dissension: an advocate of sedition, doctrines contrary to laws and customs of Moses, a crime severely punished by the Romans

World: the Roman Empire

Sect: part, precursor

Nazarenes: a name given to Christians by way of contempt, those from Judea, Jesus was a Nazarean

Pope Paul VI posing with six Protestant theologians who took part in a commission to write the New Mass. Their task was to “Protestantize” the Mass.  LET THAT SINK IN!

Etymology: The Greek noun oikos means home. The Greek verb meno- means to remain.

Changing Church teachings for purposes of being ecumenical.

1. Pre-Vatican II: The Church of Christ IS the Catholic Church.  (“Outside the Church there is NO salvation.” The Church remains a divine institution separate from the world.)
2. Vatican II: The Church of Christ SUBSISTS in the Catholic Church. Any concept of the Catholic as being necessary for salvation has been minimized or eroded in order to be ecumenical. Non-Catholics were significantly involved.
3. Synodality: Jesus’ divine Church is becoming transformed into worldly synodal “listening” Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences. Clergy, lay Catholics, lay non-Catholics are now involved in defining the Church: decision making authority regarding vocations, Church organization, Church teachings, and Church doctrine. Laity is not also involved in part in deciding Church doctrine ===> huge red flag.

What can be concluded from this?

1. In the past: ecumenism meant bringing the faithful INTO the fullness of the Truth in the Catholic Church.
2. Now: ecumenism means the Catholic Church seeking agreement or accommodation [with other faiths] OUTSIDE the Catholic Church.

What are the consequences of this? More liturgical and doctrinal confusion and ambiguity, confusion about vocations/rights, changing or re-organizing Church organization, intermingling clergy and laity decision-making authority, increasing worldliness and politics in the Church, ignoring the Church’s primary mission to BRING SOULS INTO HEAVEN, become a Church for what the laity want, a church becoming more human and less divine.

More questionable statements from Pope Leo:

1. “We have to change attitudes before we ever change doctrine.” (Pope Leo is actually open to changing doctrine to accommodate peoples’ beliefs and attitudes. Could this then potentially later be applicable to homosexuality and women deacons? This is very troubling!)
2. Pope Leo at his first consistory: Quoting Pope Paul VI, Pope Leo stated that the Church embarked on a new path “to seek the truth by way of ecumenism, interreligious dialogue, and dialogue with people of good will.” (Since the Catholic Church already has the fullness of Truth, why is Pope Leo seeking truth OUTSIDE THE CHURCH by ecumenism and interreligious dialogue? It is because of Synodality!)

Quotes by Bishop Strickland:

“If you view the Church as DIVINE: doctrine should be binding for all time, guarding doctrine, and NOT subject to revision.”  (This is the Church before Vatican II.)

“If you view the Church as merely HUMAN: then doctrine can be reshaped, softened, managed, negotiated, or set aside for the sake of unity with other faiths.” (This is the modern Church since Vatican II.)

Religious indifferentism: This heresy is the belief that all religions are equal paths to God or that religion is not necessary at all.

1. Pope Francis: found himself in making questionable and heretical statements about ecumenism. “All religions are path to God.”
2. Pope Leo: he suggested omitting the Filioque clause from the Nicene Creed to seek unity with the Eastern Church. This sounds like forsaking unity at the cost of doctrine.

Conclusion:

Ecumenical, ecumenism, orbit

Update: Since Vatican II and with Synodality, the Church seems to focus more on ecumenism, listening, and walking together rather than preaching the gospel and making disciples of all nations.

Rather than fulfilling the Church’s primary mission to BRING SOULS INTO HEAVEN, it focuses more MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.

Contrary to public belief, Joseph, Mary, and Jesus were NOT refugees. They were residents who moved from one region to another under the Roman empire. Recently, some clergy and laity seek to politicize the manger (inserting ICE as an governmental despot).

The devil’s domain resides in earthly kingdoms of the world. The devil often seeks to seduce us with worldly desires: idols, sin, fame, wealth, money, notoriety, and power. The devil also seek to distract us from God with busyness, spiritual dryness, and worldliness. ALL THE DEVIL NEEDS TO DO IS TO MAKE US FORGET ABOUT GOD!

All of us have heard that proverbial notion of someone “signing his/her soul to the devil”. I would say that this actually happens more frequently than we may think.

In the Synodal Church, Synodality (lived experiences, tolerance, inclusion, false compassion) often take precedence over Church teachings, doctrine, and Jesus’ statements. This is Synodality becoming elevated as an IDOL.

Ecumenical misleading: “Church teachings against LGBTQ are clear.” (Making this statement when actions say otherwise is essentially paying lip service to Church teachings.)

1. Yet we have many pro-LGBTQ clergy [in high positions in the Church] seeking to promote this agenda contradicting Church teachings. (This comes from continually making scandalous appointments.)
2. We have clergy who engage in this homosexual lifestyle. (These are clergy who think there is nothing wrong with this lifestyle.)
3. We have clergy who remain silent on Church teachings against homosexuality. (When the laity hear this, they may also think that there is nothing wrong with this lifestyle.)
4. Fudicia Supplicans states that Church teachings against homosexuality but then also allows “non-liturgical blessings” for same sex unions. (This documents leads same-sex couples to believe that this lifestyle can be blessed. This document further promotes confusion and ambiguity.)
5. We have LGBTQ Masses allowing LGBTQ “Catholics” living the homosexual lifestyle receiving the Eucharist. (There is no mention of receiving the Eucharist in a sinful state.)
6. We have Pope Leo approving the Vatican LGBTQ Jubilee. (We have very few clergy protesting because they are fearful of the repercussions of potential criticism from the LGBTQ community.)
7. This is a clear example of how Synodality (inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion) TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER Church teachings. 

The Novus Order Mass: the focus of this Mass is on a COMMUNITY MEAL, rather than a sacrifice. This is a result of the influence of Protestant theologian commission in formulating this Mass.

The Novus Order Mass: there continues to be a sparse attendance by Catholics. Are you surprised?

The Traditional Latin Mass: the focus is on the SACRIFICE. Attendance continues to thrive (where allowed). Are you surprised?

Vatican II just celebrated the 60th anniversary of the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate on the relationships with Non-Catholics. (This is celebrating not bringing in the faithful into the Catholic Church but ecumenism with other faiths.)

“The most deadly poison of our time is indifference.” St. Maximillian Kolbe

“No one in the world can change Truth.” St. Maximillian Kolbe

“Those wretches tainted with the error of Indifferentism and Modernism hold that dogmatic truth is not absolute, but relative, that it must adapt itself to the vary necessities of the times.” Pope Pius XI

“The greatest obstacle in the apostolate of the Church is the timidity or rather, the cowardice of the faithful.” St. Pope Pius X

“We must strip from our Catholic prayers from the Catholic liturgy which can be a shadow of a stumbling block for our separated brethren (the Protestants). Fr. Annibale Bugnini  (This Cardinal was instrumental in influencing the creation of the NO Mass at Vatican II.)

[Greek] ἀμελέω (ameleō), [Latin] neglegere: to neglect, to be negligent, to be neglectful, to be careless, to pay no attention, to have no regard, to disregard, to not care; Mt.22:5, 1Tim.4:14, Heb.2:3, Heb.8:9, 2Pet. 1:12

Pope St. Felix reminds us that both opposing Truth and being silent (refusing to defend Truth) are both evil. This is all the more applicable to popes, cardinals, bishops, and priests who neglect these responsibilities.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to neglect, to have no care for, to lose sight of, to be careless, to overlook, to slight, to let someone suffer, and to be negligent.

Hesiod’s Works and Days 400: “And they do not heed you.”

Thuycides’ The Peloponnesian War 3.40: “Teach your other allies by a striking example that the penalty of rebellion is death. Let them once understand this and you will not have so often to neglect your enemies while you are fighting your own confederates.”

Isocrates’ Evagorus 9.78: “And do not imagine that I am reproaching you for indifference at present, because I often admonish you on the same subject.”

Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis 1094: “Where now does the face of modesty or virtue have any strength? Seeing that godlessness holds sway and virtue is neglected by men and thrust behind them.”

Old Testament: This term means to resist, to provoke, to rebel, and to be disobedient.

New Testament: This term, used both in a willful and unintentional sense, means to ignore, to neglect, to be neglectful (not standing by something), and to be reminded.

Scripture:

Mt.22:5:“Some ignored the invitation and went away, one to his farm, another to his business.” (Some guests disrespectfully ignored the invitations to the wedding feast. The king invited other guests, yet one did not come with a wedding garment.)

Receiving wedding invitations:

1. This feast symbolizes what is ahead for those who have received the work of Christ.
2. This wedding garment refers to repentance, righteousness, change of heart and mind, and a life of good works.
3. The lack of proper wedding garments represent a purposeful rejection of the king’s provision for the guest.
4. This is an insult which is greater than refusing to come to the wedding. This rejection can range from indifference, willful neglect, and negligence.

1Tim.4:14:“Do not neglect the gift you have, which was conferred on you through the prophetic word with the imposition of hands of the presbyterate.” (Paul reminds Timothy of the spiritual gift of teaching and exhortation that he has been given. Do not let this gift lie unused.)

Heb.8:9:“It will not be like the covenant I made with their fathers the day I took them by the hand to lead them forth from the land of Egypt; for they did not stand by My covenant and I ignored them, says the Lord.” (The Lord offers a new superior covenant, without the need for the Law. This makes reference to Rom.2:14-15.)

2Pet.1:12: “Therefore, I will always remind [not be negligent] you of these things, even though you already known them and are established in the truth you have.” (This seeks to call to mind the apostle’s witness to the truth.)

Apostolic witness:

1. The writer states as long as he is in this “tent” [temporary earthly state], he stirs up this reminder to [others] to witness to the truth.
2. When we follow the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, we do not follow cleverly devised myths.
3. There is no prophecy of scripture that comes through personal interpretation or human will.
4. Prophecy comes through humans moved by the Holy Spirit under the influence of God. (2Pet.1:21)

Neglecting the Church’s mission to BRING SOULS INTO HEAVEN:

Salvation of souls: The 1983 Code of Canon Law ends with the statement, “The salvation of souls, which always be the SUPREME LAW of the Church, is to be kept before one’s eyes.” (This means that all laws and practices are to be interpreted through the lens of the Church’s mission to facilitate salvation.)

1. Since Vatican II and now with Synodality, the Church looks more like a United Nations NGO rather than a divine Church.
2. The Church is more focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD*** rather than with BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN.
3. The bishops are more engaged with politics, immigration, social justice, social causes, environment rather than with spiritual matters 
4. There is little mention of sin and Jesus’ statements on sin. Jn 8:12 (Go and sin no more!)
5. There is more focus on questionable ecumenism and religious indifferentism rather than making disciples of all nations (Mt.28:19-20).
6. Lived experiences, inclusion, tolerance, false compassion, and “infinite mercy” take precedence over Church teachings (doctrine), sin, forgiveness, and conversion of heart.
7. Synodality takes precedence, becoming an IDOL!

We all must be reminded that Satan is the ruler (prince) of this world. (Jn.12:31) *** ===> Satanic possession, worldliness, and “smoke of Satan”

“The devil is capable of confusing the most brilliant mind.” St. Padre Pio

Signs of Peter’s confession about Jesus that we cannot ignore:

1. Jesus tells the disciples that the Son of Man must suffer greatly, be rejected, be killed, and rise after three days.
2. Peter took Jesus aside and rebuked Him.
3. At first glance, this sounds like a reasonable reaction from Peter. Peter was concerned about Jesus’ welfare.
4. Jesus rebuked Peter and said, “Get behind Me, Satan. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.
5. However, in Peter’s seemingly “reasonable response”, Peter was briefly Satanically inspired in seeking to UNDERMINE Jesus’ mission to redeem humanity.
6. Satan seeks to undermine God, God’s creation, God’s laws, and His Church.

Signs of  worldliness, “smoke of Satan” and Satanic activity that we cannot ignore:

1. Pope Leo is meeting with the world’s senior exorcists at the Vatican. The Church describes this situation (Satanic activity) as unprecedented.
2. Vatican II brought in “fresh air” [worldliness] and “the smoke of Satan” [spirit of UNDERMINING] in the Church so that the Church “can get with the times”.
3. Synodality has unfortunately brought in MORE worldliness and MORE “smoke of Satan” into the Church ==> scandalous clergy, paying lip service to Church teachings, more focused on worldly affairs*** rather than with spiritual affairs.
4. Scandalous clergy: engaging in homosexual lifestyles UNDERMINING the priest’s vows of celibacy. Satan would be proud of this behavior if this seeks to destroy the priesthood.
5. Abortion has often been considered as a Satanic “anti-sacrament” or “sacrifice to Moloch” destroying life.
6. Satan does not need to completely possess someone. Satan only needs to make someone forget about God.
7. “Selling one’s soul to the devil”***: This most likely happens MORE than we realize for those chasing, money, worldly acclaim, fame, power, celebrity, “stuff”, and likes.
8. Satan ultimately seeks to undermine the Church. Satan will happily encourage people (both clergy and laity) to UNDERMINE the Church.
9. Efforts to undermine the Church: one must determine whether or not if this may be influenced by worldliness or be possibly Satan inspired

Etymology

1. This term contains the Greek prefix (a-) meaning without or not.
2. The Greek verb melei means to think about or to care for.
3. The Latin neglectus is the negative past participle of the Latin verb legere, meaning to choose or select.

Conclusion:

Neglect, neglectful, negligent

Greek Hellenism: several nuanced meanings include the modern expressions of “not losing sight of”, “not unmindful of”, and “do not heed”.

Old Testament: This term plays an important role in defining man’s relationship with God (involves the unintentional or willful neglect of traditions.

Update: Pope Pius X in 1907 warned about us the Modernists (and Synodalists) taking leadership in the Church. Pope Pius X warned about Church teachings being defined by lived experiences,  sentiments, and perceptions. 

This is what many are neglecting to acknowledge: The Democrats oppose ICE because the Democrats do not want to deport illegals, because they can potentially become their future voter base.

The Virginia Democrats continue to dis-enfranchise and neglect Republican voters by their partisan Democratic gerrymandering.

Neglecting a moral compass: Pope Leo congratulates the new pro-abortion woman Anglican “Archbishop” while threatening to excommunicate the SSPX!

Vatican LGBTQ Jubilee:

1. Pope Leo QUIETLY GAVE APPROVAL for the Vatican LGBTQ Jubilee.
2. Not surprisingly scandal and liturgical sacrilege followed.
3. Pope Leo PREDICTABLY REMAINED SILENT AFTERWARDS.
4. Evidently it is not good optics to later condemn something you had previously approved.
5. So you remain quiet. SILENCE ===> TACIT ACCEPTANCE.

The slippery slope of worldliness*** ===> pushing the doctrinal envelope of Church teachings because of lived experiences, toleration, inclusion, false compassion, paying lip service to Church teachings ===> doctrinal and liturgical confusion, sin, and heresies.

We cannot ignore the influence of the Holy Spirit.

1. Cardinal Parolin is now saying that we need to get past Traditiones Custodes.
2. Cardinal Roche is asking, “Something else is clearly afoot?” 
3. It is the Holy Spirit who is acting in opposing the implementation of Traditiones Custodes.
4. The laity continue to protest against the bishops restricting the TLM.

Too many controversial and scandalous clergy continue to promote their own heretical beliefs in opposition to Catholic teachings. Unfortunately, these scandalous actions and events continue to happen because of silent and tacit acceptance. But the laity always take notice of these scandalous priests.

We cannot ignore that more and more Protestants are converting to Catholicism. They are discovering the scriptural errors, limitations, and historical problems of Protestant thinking. 

Protestants must be reminded that 2Pet.1:21 explicitly REJECTS private interpretation of scripture. This comes from human beings moved by the Holy Spirit. This sounds like a teaching authority ===> a Church inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Many of the clergy continue to neglect and UNDERMINE Church teachings against homosexuality with a LGBTQ “outreach” of inclusion, engaging in homosexual lifestyles, tolerance, false compassion, and silence and ignoring of Church teachings against homosexuality. One must ask, “how much of these actions are influenced by worldliness or by Satanic influences?***

“The business of eternal salvation is to us the most important of all affairs; but it is also the most neglected by Christians.” St. Alphonsus Liguori

“Do not be surprised if you fall everyday and do not surrender. Stand your ground bravely.” St. John Climacus

“There is nothing unpremeditated, nothing neglected by God. His unsleeping eyes beholds all things.” St. Basil

[Greek] ἐπιτρέπω (epitrepō), [Latin] exire, [French] sortir, [French] partir, [Latin] permittere, [Latin] dimittere, [French] dispenser [French] admettre, [Latin] mittere, [French] jeter, [French] catapulter: to allow, to permit, to entrust, to let; 22 scriptures

We now currently live in a post-Christian secular world of inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion where sin is often tolerated, ignored, or not even recognized (by both clergy and laity.)

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to yield to, to permit, to let, to leave to, to indulge, and to rely upon.

Homer’s Odyssey 2.226: “To Mento, Odysseus had given all his house in charge.”

Aristophanes’ Plutus 1079: “With anyone but you I should not be so easy.”

Plato’s Euthyphro 5e: “That this is established and right and that we ought not to let him who acts impiously go unpunished.”

Plato’s Charmides 171e: “Nor should be we permit others under our governance to do anything but what likely to do right.”

Old Testament: This term means to loosen to relinquish, to permit, to forsake, and to abandon.

New Testament: This term means to permit and to allow.

Noteworthy scripture:

Would-be followers of Jesus: Lk.9:59,61, Mt.8:21

1. Jesus states that Christian discipleship must take precedence over family obligations. (Jesus is intolerant in the need to do this.)
2. Even family ties must not eclipse the obligation of proclaiming the kingdom of heaven.
3. Jewish and Hellenistic cultures placed an extremely high importance on familial obligations.
4. Jesus: let the spiritually dead (who do not follow Jesus) bury their dead.

Mk.5:13: “And He let them [demonic spirits and the unclean spirits], and the unclean spirits came out and entered the swine. The herd of about two thousand swine rushed down a steep bank into the sea where they were drowned.” (The herding of swine indicates that Gentiles resided in the territory of the Gerasenes.)

Mk.10:4-5: “Moses permitted him to write a bill of divorce and dismiss her. Moses wrote this because of the hardness of your hearts.” ***

Old Testament: Taking a larger “bird’s eye” view of God’s relationship with man, one can claim that God was viewing the Old Testament people like adolescents, LOWERING THE BAR in moral conduct.

***New Testament: Jesus RAISES THE BAR in moral conduct in referring back to God’s intended design for marriage. Jesus says to the people of the New Testament, “You now need to act like grown-ups and act accordingly.” 

Jn.19:38: “Joseph of Arimathea, secretly a disciple of Jesus, asked Pilate if he could remove Jesus’ body. And Pilate permitted it.”

Acts 21:39: “Paul said, ‘I am a Jew, of Tarsus of Cilicia; I request you permit me to speak to the people.” I [Paul] request you to permit me to speak to the people.'” (Saul was his Jewish name. Paul was his Roman name.)

Acts 28:16: “When he entered Rome, Paul was allowed to live by himself [in prison] with the soldier who was guarding him.” (Paul was placed under a mild form of custody. He was allowed to proclaim the Word.)

1Cor.14:34: “As in all the churches of the holy ones, women should keep silent in the church, or they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says.” (It must be acknowledged that this was a patriarchal society. Women speaking in public was considered an act of independence. Women conducted their activities separately and privately. This was part of the traditional view that a woman was to be subject to her husband.)

The Vatican’s outreach to accommodate the LGBTQ community:

1. In their efforts of inclusion, the Vatican is making concerted efforts to destigmatize, to normalize, and to ignore the sinful nature of homosexuality.
2. There are also many clergy who engage in the homosexual lifestyle. This has been stated by Peter Kwasniewski, Fr. Joaquim Heimerl, among others.
3. In addition, many clergy often “pay lip-service” to Church teachings against homosexuality. This is an aspect of practical atheism (paying lip service to God).
4. Pope Francis and Pope Leo have made questionable appointments who have questioned Church teachings. (John Paul II Institute)
5. Yet, they continually overlook or ignore: Jesus’ command to SIN NO MORE (Jn.8:11): “Neither do I condemn you, Go and from now on do not sin any more.”
6. They also continually ignore that Jesus was called to come to sinners. BUT HE DID NOT TOLERATE SINFUL BEHAVIOR!
7. Jesus exercised true compassion based on God’s moral order.
8. Pope Francis never intended to clamp down on the German bishops’ teachings on homosexuality and gender.
9. In an effort to accommodate the German bishops, the Vatican issued Fiducia Supplicans. This document deviously stated both Church teachings against homosexuality and provided “non-liturgical blessings” or a sinful same-sex union.
10. Fr. James Martin actually believes that St. Paul got it wrong about the sinful nature of homosexuality. Let that sink in! 
11. The Vatican recently permitted its Vatican LGBTQ Jubilee. Not surprisingly, scandal followed.
12. Why was Pope Leo silent about this? Because Pope allowed Bishop Savino to celebrate this mass. Evidently, it is not good optics to publicly criticize an event you will be had previously allowed.
13. Not surprisingly, only a few clergy offered a Mass of reparations for this scandalous event. As you can see, Pope Leo is also part of this problem.
14. A scandalous confirmation, led by Fr. James Martin was held in Manhattan New York. Evidently, Cardinal Dolan has remained quiet about this? Shocker!
15. Bishop Strickland pleaded with this brother bishops at the USCCB. Not surprisingly, his pleas were ignored. These bishops are evidently fearful or afraid in criticizing the LGBTQ community.
16. The USCCB just recently approved a “LGBTQ friendly” bible. This is seeking to whitewash or de-stigmatize the sin of homosexuality to make it more publicly acceptable.

Catholic sociologist Gabriele Kuby’s criticism of the German bishops:

1. “A great apostasy” is happening in the German Church.
2. The German Episcopal Conference encourages defining one’s sexual identity and stipulates that Catholic sexual morality is an disputed issue.
3. Kuby denounces this doctrinal drift as a lack of correction from the Vatican toward the German bishops.
4. These German bishops are not safeguarding traditional Catholic doctrine
5. Catholic schools are being forced to adopt LGBTQ agenda and gender ideology.
6. Pope Francis never intended to intervene or dismantle the German bishops’ teaching on sexuality and marriage.
7. This has caused devastating consequences for young people: depression, body mutilation, confusion, and the family breakdown
8. Kuby sees hope as there is a new discipleship that is emerging, formed by prayer, Scripture, spiritual renewal, and Catholic formation.

Catholic psychiatrist Conrad Baars explaining false compassion:

“A person in authority who deprives his subjects of the truth when he says, even with the best intention of helping them, ‘You may ignore the teachings of the Magisterium: God’s laws are too hard for you.’ By that he says in effect, ‘You are not and never will be strong and good enough to adhere to these laws.”  (One wonders if this message is being disseminated to the LGBTQ community.)

Should women be allowed to have greater responsibility in the Church?

Traditional Catholic view: Men’s and women’s vocations are assigned by God and the Church. Men ==> priests [in the person of Christ] and deacons. Women ==> nuns, sister, consecrated

Synodal (political view): Vocations are assigned by political rights. There must be equal gender equality in Church leadership positions. Women should have the opportunity to become priests and deacons. Mens’ and womens’ vocations are assigned by man. One can only wonder if they think God or the Church is misogynistic?? The Synod is still studying the idea of women deacons. But THIS IS NOT CATHOLIC!

‎[Greek] τροπή (tropē), [Latin] trophaeum: a turning, trophy, revolution, or change; Jas 1:17

In 102 A.D. the Roman emperor Trajan erected the monument Trophaeum (Traiani) commemorating the victory (turning point) over the Dacians.

Jas.1:17: “All good giving and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no alteration) or shadow caused by change [turning].” (Unlike the heavenly bodies, God is immutably constant, good, and unchanging.)

Trope: This is a figure of speech used for artistic effect.  Ex. Achilles’ heal ==> weak spot

Tropaion/trophaeum: A monument was often erected to designate a turning point in a battle. The circumstances of this event have often defined by the victor.

Conclusion:

Permit, permission, admit, admission, mission, catapult, exit, sort, part, dispense, reject, rejection, sortie, resort

It was commonly thought that the gods controlled one’s fate and destiny.

Update: It is important not to allow others to deny and obliterate one’s understanding of our country. Orwell was very prophetic about hate speech, cancel culture, and others’ naive understanding of history.

Many people, Christians and non-Christians, who do not accept or tolerate others’ values (and behaviors), are now often being perceived as intolerant, hateful, and extreme. (Those who accuse others of being intolerant are actually the ones who are being intolerant! (like those criticizing American Eagle and Sydney Sweeney)

In Germany, a Catholic priest was put on trial for hate speech because he condemned homosexuality (which is actual Church teachings!). It seems that the German clergy are really now promoting homosexuality as an acceptable behavior. Very alarming!

Synodality is essentially LOWERING THE BAR to adherence to Catholic teaching. Synodality is becoming a new religion focusing on “making a better world” and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. Synodality is becoming a new religion.

If you assume that Catholics and Christians are intolerant, hateful, and extreme, they get their moral belief systems from God. Taking this notion to its inevitable conclusion, then one must conclude that God MUST BE INTOLERANT, HATEFUL, AND EXTREME! (Good luck with supporting this view!)

We now need leaders and shepherds that show TRUE COMPASSION in pointing out what is morally right and wrong. One’s eternal (spiritual) welfare could be at stake!

Charlie Kirk, a Christian, has stated that young men are attracted to the Catholic Church because it is ancient, beautiful and UNCHANGING.

Quotes by GK Chesterton who has often be called the “apostle of common sense”:

Quotes on tolerance:

“The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” George Orwell

“In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” George Orwell

“Tolerance is not a Christian value. Tolerating grave evil within a society is itself a form of serious evil.” Archbishop Chaput

“Tolerance applies only to persons, but never to principles. Intolerance apply to principles, but never to persons.” Bishop Fulton Sheen   (The Church should and must show intolerance in being constant in its teachings.)

“We do not want a church that moves with the world. We want a church that moves the world.” GK Chesterton

“Societies are far gone in depravity when toleration is considered a good in itself, without regard to the thing tolerated.” GK Chesterton

https://infovaticana.com/en/2025/12/01/gabriele-kuby-critical-sociologist-of-the-german-episcopate-the-great-apostasy-is-happening-around-us-2/

Separating doctrinal reality from liberation feminist ideology

1. Pope Leo reappointed Sr. Simona Brambilla as prefect of the dicastery of religious institutes. (Instead of appointing someone else, Pope Leo kept her in this position. Let that sink in!
2. This sister stated that, “God is a mother, God is a woman.”  This sounds like tribal beliefs, like Panchamama (a pagan fertility goddess).
3. This becomes an example of relativism (inculturation) in replacing cultural anthropology for divine Truth.
4. This is an example of female empowerment in authority in the Vatican. A woman has been placed in charge of governing priests. Does that mean appointing a priest is old fashioned?
5. This is another example of re-imagining Church structure. This is Synodality changing the leadership organization of the Catholic Church.

Background information:

[Greek] μωρός (mōros), [Latin] fatuus, [Latin] stultus, [Latin] imprudens, [Latin] stupidus, [German] dumm: dull, insipid, foolish, stupid, unwise, dull-witted; Mt.5:22, Mt.7:26, Mt.23:17,19, Mt.25:2,3,8, 1Cor.1:25,27, 1Cor.3:18, 1Cor.4:10, 2Tim.2:23, Tit.3:9

Mater Populi Fedelis provides another illustration in how the Vatican seeks to downgrade the role and status of Mary in the Church. The Vatican also has downgraded its criteria for Marian apparitions.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means dull, sluggish (of the nerves), stupid, folly, foolish, and insipid (flat taste). Regarding the intellect, this term can refer to dullness, lack of judgment, and a deficiency of intellectual or spiritual capacity. In medicine, this term refers to slackness, fatigue or dulling of the nerves. In hibernation, animals act sluggishly in winter.

Xenophon’s Anabasis 7.6.21: “Are you not ashamed of being so stupidly deceived? But to be deceived seems to be more shameful than to be deceived.”

Aristophanes’ Ecclesiazusae 474: “It’s and old saying that our absurdist and maddest decrees always somehow turn out for our own good.”

Euripides’ Medea 614: “You would be a fool not to accept this offer. Forget your anger and it will be better for you.”

Demosthenes’ Phillipic 3 9.54: “But you have reached such a height of folly or madness. I know not what to call it.”

Sophocles’ Antigone 469: “And if my present actions are foolish in your sight, it may be that it is a fool who accuses me of folly.”

Old Testament: This term means foolish, folly, arrogant, senseless, stupid, quarrelsome, and wicked.

Foolishness (folly):

1. Folly is the unintentional and intentional lack of knowledge of God.
2. Having eyes that do not see and having ears that do not hear. Foolishness can involve arrogance, religious indifference, and lack of understanding.
3. Folly can be condemned as apostasy from God. Foolishness and wickedness can ruin and destroy one’s relationships with God.
4. Evil and corrupt leaders/rulers are often perceived as fools.
5. Devotion to idols is seen as foolish and scandalous.
6. The wisdom of Sirach is seen as a rule of life (warning) against human foolishness.

New Testament: This term means being foolish, foolishness, simplemindedness, and God’s ‘foolishness’ (wisdom).

Scripture:

Mt.5:22: “But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment, and whoever says to his brother, ‘Raqa’, will be answerable to the Sanhedrin, whoever says, ‘you fool’ will be liable to the fiery Gehenna.” (Anger is the motive behind murder. It is important to settle these disputes. Otherwise, you may be subject to a judge’s severe judgment. This alludes to the unrepentant sinner in the coming judgment of God.)

Raqa: This name is an Aramaic term meaning imbecile or blockhead.

Gehenna: This name refers to the center of an idolatrous cult in which children were offered in sacrifice. Children were aborted in honor of Molech.

Mt.7:26: “And everyone who listens to these words of mine but does NOT act on them will be like a fool who built his house on sand.” (Without a strong foundation, there is no hope of salvation. God the Father has laid His foundation of His people on His own Son.)

Having a foundation built on sand:

1. Only hearing the word, but not doing (acting) upon the word.
2. Relying upon one’s own works, accomplishments, stature, wisdom, learning, justification.
3. Relying upon one’s own tolerance, inclusion, niceness, mercy.
4. Relying upon one’s own religious training, human doctrines, ignorance of scripture.

Foolish scribes and Pharisees:

1. They preach but they do not practice (Mt.23:3)
2. They lay heavy burdens on others (Mt.23:4)
3. They lock the kingdom of heaven before humans. You do not enter yourselves, nor do you allow entrance to those trying to enter. (Mt. 23:13)
4. On the outside they appear righteous, but inside they are filled with hypocrisy and evildoing. (Mt.23:28)

Mt.25:2: “The foolish ones [virgins] when taking their lamps, brought no oil with them.” (The Parable of the Ten Virgins illustrates the foolish Christians who are not prepared and not ready to receive Jesus, the Bridegroom. This Christian is not prepared to enter into the kingdom of heaven.)

1Cor.1:25: “For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.” (Wisdom and power are found to be paradoxical in the relationship with God and man. The folly of the cross is often seen foolish contrary to all human reasoning. God’s wisdom and truth are often seen foolish by human reasoning. Likewise, man’s ‘wisdom’ is often seen foolish by God. The wisdom of this world is foolishness in the ‘eyes’ of God [1Cor.3:18]).

1Cor.1:27: “Rather, God chose the foolish of the world to shame the wise, and God chose the weak of the world to shame the strong.” (The weak and lowly, who have the riches of faith, confound those who have have riches (rank, knowledge, wealth, and power) in the world. This scripture illustrates the great differences of values.)

1Cor.3:18: “Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you considers himself wise in this age, let him become a fool as to become [truly] wise.”

Deceiving oneself: being filled up with vanity, wisdom, learning, philosophies, and human doctrines

Becoming a fool: becoming truly wise in the sight of God, submitting to the gospel, renouncing the world’s wisdom, being perceived as a fool by the world

Foolish Modernist and Synodalist clergy:

1. They preach but they do not practice: Many clergy do NOT preach the Church’s teachings against homosexuality.
2. They do not preach at all: Many clergy ignore, refute, “pay lip service”, or remain silent about Church teachings against homosexuality.
3. They lay heavy burdens on others: Many (both clergy and laity) are led to believe that homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle.
4. On the outside they appear righteous, but inside they are filled with hypocrisy and evil doing: Many priests actively engage in the sinful homosexual lifestyle.
5. They lock the kingdom of heaven before humans: Many souls will be put in mortal peril for having engaged in homosexuality at the time of their judgment.
6. They produce Church documents which permit sinful activity: Fiducia Supplicans: allows for “non-liturgical blessings” for same-sex couples.
7. They produce Church documents which lay heavy burdens on others: Traditiones Custodes restricting the TLM
8. They follow human traditions: The Synodal Church DISREGARDS Jesus’ command TO MAKE DISCIPLES OF ALL NATIONS and TO BRING SOULS INTO HEAVEN but instead seeks to MAKE A BETTER WORLD/SEEK FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.

The Transalpine Redemptorists condemn the Vatican’s document on Mary as Co-Mediatrix and Mediatrix of All Graces:

1. The primary purpose of this document is to initiate an ecumenical effort to Protestants. Catholics already know that Mary is NOT higher than our Lord.
2. This document reeks of Jansenism, which seeks to minimize the status and honor of Mary. Mary must not be elevated this high.
3. Jansenism downplays Our Lady’s active role at Calvary and emphasizes that Christ alone is the one Redeemer.
4. Jansenists believe that “Our Lady co-redeemed the world” is pious excess and doctrinal error.
5. The Transalpine Redemptorists has just called this Vatican document heretical.
6. Some say that having to repeatedly explain Mary’s role in the Church is a weak argument. (In other words, the Vatican thinks the people are too dumb to understand. You just need to clearly define her role.

THE VATICAN WOULD BE FOOLISH TO IGNORE THESE APPROVED MARIAN APPARIITIONS.

Marian prophesies:

Akita (1973): “The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops opposing bishops. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.”

1. Cardinals and bishops oppose each other on Church teachings against homosexuality, moral character (chastity) vs. homosexuality proclivities of the priesthood.
2. Modernist/Synodalist clergy continue to oppose the laity’s desire to celebrate the TLM.
3. The laity continues to criticize the clergy who offend or cause scandal. The laity continues to criticize the clergy’ silence in responding to scandal and sacrilege.
4. Compromising moral standards (toleration, inclusion, and false compassion): Church teachings are often ignored, disregarded, or watered down.
5. The papacies of Pope Francis and Pope Leo continued to be defined by doctrinal and liturgical confusion and ambiguity.

Our Lady of Good Success (1635): “The sacred sacrament of holy orders will be ridiculed, oppressed and despised. These corrupted priests, who will scandalize the Christian people, will incite the hatred of bad Christians, enemies. The apparent triumph of Satan will bring enormous sufferings to the good pastors of the Church.”

1. Faithful traditional (conservative) are sometimes criticized, censured, deposed, and laicized for upholding traditional Church teachings because they are “divisive“.
2. Clergy often cause liturgical scandals at Masses, Vatican events, and pilgrimages.
3. There are too many clergy (cardinals, bishops, and priests) who promote LGBQT “outreach” with disregards or pays lip service to Church teachings against homosexuality.
4. There are too many clergy who engage in the homosexual lifestyle. This is more notable in the liberal and more progressive older generations of priests
5. Too many clergy are being influenced by Satan’s efforts to undermine Church teaching, structure, doctrine, Church attendance, and vocations.
6. In contrast, the younger priests and seminarians are become conservative and traditionally minded. They favor the TLM.
7. The Church sex abuse scandal was greatly influenced by the clergy’s homosexual proclivities and devaluation of celibacy.

Fatima (1917): “There will be a wicked council planned and prepared that will change the countenance of the Church. Many will lose the faith. Confusion will reign everywhere. The sheep will search for the shepherds in vain. A schism will tear apart the holy tunic of My Son. The Church will bleed from Her wounds.”

“More souls go to hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason.” ***

1. Pope John XXIII naively believed that it was necessary to “bring in fresh air (worldliness) so that the Church can get with the times.”
2. Pope Paul VI later stated that the “smoke of Satan” (confusion and upheaval against the Church) has entered into the Church.
3. Synodality explicitly seeks to continue what Vatican started: to make a worldly Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences. (CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHURCH)
4. Since Vatican II has lead to a pastoral and spiritual disaster for the Church: lack of Church attendance, loss of vocation, liturgical sacrilege, sex abuse scandal, and disobedience of the bishops.
5. Pope Francis and Pope Leo continue to sow the seeds of doctrinal and liturgical confusion (ambiguity).
6. The German Synodal Church is “renewing” and “reforming” itself into heresy and decline. (CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHURCH)
7. There continues to be a schism between traditional (conservative) Catholics and Modernists (Synodalists).
8. Synodality introduces toleration, inclusion, and rejection of Church teachings. Synodality (lived experiences) take precedence over Church teachings. Synodality becomes an IDOL!
9. Synodality is introducing shared decision making authority between clergy and laity in order to become a “listening Church”, redefining vocations, decentralized authority, becoming more like a Protestant Church. (CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHURCH)
10. The Vatican and Synodality continue to focus primarily on Making A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. Bringing souls into heaven has become a less important priority.

Pope John XIII and the “prophets of doom”: Pope John stated that the “prophets of doom” were those critics who believed that the modern world and the Church were in a state of inevitable deterioration, decay, and pessimism. Those “prophets of doom” [illustrating the warnings of Fatma] were right!

Two Cardinals suggesting how the Mary has prophesied the problems of the Church.

“In the Third Secret, it is foretold, among other things that the great apostasy in the Church will begin at the top.” Cardinal Ciappi

“The Blessed Virgin was alerting us against apostasy in the Church.” Cardinal Oddi

The Marian apparition has NOT been technically approved by the Church. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE WHEN AN APPARTION DOES NOT NOT NEED TO BE APPROVED TO BECOME TRUE!

Garabandal (1965): “Many cardinals, many bishops, and many priests are on the road to perdition and are taking many souls with them.” (Not officially approved by the Church, but this prophecy still self-incriminates the Vatican)

1. The Vatican issued Fiducia Supplicans, a document that allows “blessings” for same-sex unions. Some have said that the Church has reached its “millstone moment.“
2. The Church is disregarding the grave sin of homosexuality. Many clergy and laity are putting eternal souls in mortal peril at their judgment.
3. Many clergy unfortunately are engaged in the homosexual lifestyle. This also has contributed to the Church’s sexual abuse crisis.
4. Kyle Clement, assistant to exorcist priest Fr. Rippenger, warns that blessing same sex unions flings the door open to the demonic.
5. Some have said with Fiducia Supplicans, the Church has entered into its “millstone moment”.  The Church is permitting a blessing for a sinful lifestyle so terrible that it would be preferable to be drowned by millstone around one’s neck than to engage in this sin.

New Vatican provisions regarding Marian apparitions:

Why is this a foolish and questionable provision?

1. This provision states that an apparition that “creates division with the Church” will NOT be approved.
2. Many of these past APPROVED Marian apparitions, prophesying divisions and problems in the Church, have already come true!
3. This new Vatican provision essentially undermines and ignores these past apparitions: to provide the Church warnings of divine chastisement and punishment.
4. These actions reflects more on the Vatican’s efforts to whitewash Mary and these Marian apparitions.
5. Vatican Marian “expert Fr. Maurizo Gronchi claims that considering the Virgin Mary as “Co-Redemptrix or “Mediatrix” leads to a superstitious view. This view contradicts past established Catholic teaching on Mary. (Huge Red Flag!)
6. It seems that the Vatican loses credibility in light of all these Marian apparitions coming true.
7. The Vatican seems more interested in controlling the narrative that these Marian messages do NOT reflect negatively on the Church (clergy and laity).

More foolish nonsense from the Vatican: having to backtrack on their the Vatican document.

1. The Vatican perceived that this document had pleased the Protestants and yet disappointed Catholics.
2. This Vatican document has contradicted past saints’, doctors’, popes’ support for these Marian titles.
3. Cardinal Fernandez “clarifies” “Co-Redemptrix” off limits in official Vatican documents, but permitted in private devotion. Yet, this undermines their statement saying, this Marian title is “always inappropriate. What???

The Church’s foolish LGBT “outreach”:

1. Many clergy are ignoring, refuting, or paying lip service to the Church’s teachings against homosexuality.
2. This is also evidenced by the many clergy who are actually living in a homosexual lifestyle.
3. These clergy are ignoring Jesus’ statements on sin and sinning no more.
4. Many laity are unaware or not being told that homosexuality is sinful. As a result, many souls are in eternal peril (unwilling or unable to enter into heaven).
5. Tolerance, inclusion, and false compassion are essentially becoming a “slippery slope” toward sinful activity.
6. There is no focus or emphasis on sin, forgiveness, and conversion of heart.

More synodal foolishness:

“We must not evangelize the whole world. God will find away to guide non-believers. Many do not need religion, faith, or any church.” German bishop Overbeck

“The end of Christendon is not a defeat, but a kairos, the chance to return to what is essential, the freedom of beginnings, to that yes spoken out of love, without fears and guarantees.” (This cardinal is actually celebrating loss of Catholic faithfulness and membership!)

“The theology of the Church has changed.” Cardinal Roche (This cardinal sounds like an arrogant Pharisee who thinks he knows better.)

Update: ***You will know them by their fruits (priorities): The Church continues every opportunity to MAKE A BETTER WORLD and to SEEK FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. The Church is DOUBLING DOWN on its efforts to promote immigration (and illegal immigration) and oppose a nation’s right to secure its borders.

Many empowered bishops are enacting Traditiones Custodes, under the guise of “unity”, is foolish because it causes division and marginalizes the laity’s desire to worship in the TLM.

These same empowered bishops evidently are more concerned about promoting their Modernist/Synodality ideology rather than responding to the laity’s concerns.

Amoris Laetitia and Fiducia Supplicans are foolish in that these documents “push the doctrinal envelope under the guise of mercy above all else.” This can lead to scandal, heresy, and sin.

When local bishops continue to permit sacrileges, Pope Leo remains quiet. One questions whether if Pope Leo will lead by example and tell other bishops to show integrity and fidelity to Church teachings.

“Foolish is the questioning of man against the goodness of God.” St. Gregory

“We were ensnared by the wisdom of the serpent, we are set free from the foolishness of God.” St. Augustine

“Whoever perverts the sayings of the Lord for his/her desires is the firstborn of Satan. Let us there, leave the foolishness and false teachings of the crowd.” St. Polycarp

https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2025/11/19/virgin-mary-doesnt-have-the-role-of-holding-back-gods-wrath-vatican-expert-says/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fr-heimerl-francis-synodal-church-is-controlled-by-old-homosexual-men/

[Greek] ἰός (ios), [Latin] ferrugo, [Latin] venenum, [Latin] virus, [German] eisenrost, [German] gift: poison, venom, rust; Rom.3:13, Jas.3:8, Jas.5:3

The Vatican document Mater Populi Fidelis, instead of celebrating Mary’s role in the Church, downgrades her role in its intended ecumenical efforts to reach Protestants. This document sprinkles poisonous drops of the Jansenist heresy, diminishing Mary’s status in the role of Redemption.

Background information:

Old Testament: This term means poison, malicious words, and evil.

New Testament: This term means poison, venom, rust, and corrosion.

Rom.3:13: “Their throats are open graves; they deceive with their tongues; the venom of asp is on their lips.” (All human beings share the common burden of sin. They are manifested by their throat, tongue, lips, mouth, feet, and eyes.)

Universal bondage to sin:

1. Although the Jews may have a privileged status, both Jews and Gentiles are under the guilt of sin.
2. No one can be justified under the law. The Jews are equally corrupt and depraved as the Gentiles.
3. They are without understanding in relation to what is good.
4. Where there is no fear of God, God is hidden from them.
5. Tongues and lips spew out poison (words) of serpents.
6. Sin drives one into hatred and makes words as treacherous weapons.
7. The destructive power of sin is the antithesis of the saving message of Christ.

Jas.3:8: “But no human being can tame the tongue. It is restless evil, full of deadly poison.” (The unruly tongue can produce one of the greatest evils. There is no poison more deadly than the poison [venom] of the tongue.)  

Jas.5:3: “Your gold and silver have corroded, and that corrosion will be a testimony against you; it will devour your flesh like a fire. You have stored up treasure for the last days. (James speaks to the transitory (temporary) character of life. Rust corrupts gold, silver, and one’s character. This is a warning against the attachment (confidence) of riches and earthly treasures.)

The Transalpine Redemptorists condemn the Vatican’s document on Mary as Co-Mediatrix and Mediatrix of All Graces:

1. The primary purpose of this document is to initiate an ecumenical effort to Protestants. Catholics already know that Mary is NOT higher than our Lord.
2. This document reeks of Jansenism, which seeks to minimize the status and honor of Mary. Mary must not be elevated this high.
3. Jansenism downplays Our Lady’s active role at Calvary and emphasizes that Christ alone is the one Redeemer.
4. Jansenists believe that “Our Lady co-redeemed the world” is pious excess and doctrinal error.
5. The Transalpine Redemptorists has just called this Vatican document heretical.
6. Modernism is essentially the synthesis of all heresies.

Troublesome, poisonous, and “over the top” ideas and statements from the clergy:

1. “All religions are a path to reach God.” (This is the heresy of indifferentism: the belief that all religions are equally valid paths to truth or salvation.)
2. Under the guise of promoting “unity”, Traditiones Custodes seeks to restrict and remove the Traditional Latin Mass. (This document continues to cause further division in the Church.)
3. Fiducia Supplicans both states Church teachings against homosexuality but also provides “liturgical blessings” for same sex couples. (This document is allowing for “blessings” of evil and sin.)
4. Vatican’ LGBTQ outreach: providing inclusion, tolerance, accompaniment, but also disregarding Church teachings against homosexuality.(Sin is ignored.)
5. Pope Leo stating that the supreme law of the Church is love, not the SALVATION OF SOULS. (This is quite evident in his synodal thinking (MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD takes precedence over the SALVATION OF SOULS.)
6. Vital immanence: redefining God, doctrine, Church teachings, and sin through one’s sentiments. (Synodality is the next step of Modernism. Synodality becomes elevated as an IDOL.)
7. Seamless garment doctrine: equating and minimizing grave moral issues with lesser moral issues. (Immigration takes on the same gravity of abortion. The bishops are currently doubling down on immigration.)
8. More seamless doctrine: USCCB VP Bishop Flores equates massive deportation to driving someone to an abortion clinic. (This statement goes off the deep end in terms of equivalency of intrinsic evils.)

Etymology: The German noun gift means poison and gift.

Conclusion:

Ferrous, ferric, virus, viral, rust, rusty

Update: Some progressive and liberal “Catholics” actually believe that the Church’s teachings against homosexuality is “hateful”. This is a poisonous anti-Catholic sentiment.

Words, silence, and actions have consequences. Pope Leo has remained silent and indifferent towards allowing scandals to occur in the Church. Pope Leo continue to make questionable appointments. 

It seems that Pope Leo is continuing Pope Francis’ path in allowing doctrinal and liturgical confusion (ambiguity) to continue in his papacy. 

Unfortunately, there are too many Protestant pastors and ministers who promote the “prosperity gospel”, which focuses on material and earthly treasures.

Pastors who have mansions: not a good look!

Many have lost sight that heavenly (spiritual) treasures are much longer lasting than earthly treasures.  We won’t be able to take our stuff with us when we enter into heaven.

The Vatican LGBTQ “outreach” continues its tolerance, inclusion, accompaniment to the LGBTQ community. Clergy and laity continue to ignore or pay lip service to Church teachings against homosexuality.

The poison of sin remaining with someone: Many clergy and laity will NOT talk about the sin of homosexuality. As a result, many souls will be put in mortal peril for engaging in this lifestyle.

More synodal poison: confirmation of homosexual couples. The Vatican document Fiducia Supplicans is affirming his sinful lifestyle with “blessings.”

“The most deadly poison of our times is indifference.” St. Maximilian Kolbe

“Ignorance is a dangerous and spiritual poison, which all men ought to warily to shun.” Pope Gregory I

“Yet the theological poison remains unchanged.” Fr. Frederico Palma (upon the election of Pope Leo XIV)

“Sin is like poison. When you sin, it is as if you drank poison; you are the person who is going be poisoned. It is useless to blame others when you get poisoned and die.” St. Sharbal

[Greek] (antilegō), [Latin] contradicere, [Latin] negare, [French] contester; to contradict, to deny, to oppose, to say nothing, to object, to refute, to denounce; Lk.2:34, Lk.20:27, Jn.19:12, Acts 13:45, Acts 28:19,22, Rom.10:21, Tit.1:9, Tit.2:9

In St. Peter’s Basilica, about 5000 people attended this TLM. This highly attended Mass essentially contradicts the Vatican’s narrative that the Church’s ecclesiology has changed.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to speak against, to contradict, to tell a tale in reply, and to dispute.

Euripides’ Hippolytus 993: “I shall begin to speak from the point where you first attacked me expecting you would destroy me with not a word to say in reply.”

Xenophon’s Memorabilia 4.6.13: “Whenever anyone argued with him on any point without being able to make himself clear, he would lead the whole discussion back to the definition required.

Aristophanes’ Lysistrata 806: “Well, I’ll relate a rival fable just to show you a different point of view.”

Old Testament: This term means to move, to turn back, to retreat, to apostatize, to contend, and to complain.

Isa.8:14: “He shall be a snare, a stone for injury, a rock for stumbling to both the houses of Israel, a trap and snare to those who dwell in Jerusalem.”

New Testament: This term means to contradict, to deny, to refute, to oppose, to object, to speak against, and to talk back.

Lk.2:34: “Simeon blessed them and said to Mary His mother, ‘Behold, this child is destined for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be contradicted.'” (Jesus will cause some to fall (stumble) and to rise (be saved). This passage refers to Isaiah prophesying that the Messiah will be a snare and stumbling block for those who cannot accept Him. [Isa. 8:14] Jesus will be an object of contempt and rejection by many people.)

Lk.20:27: “Some Sadducees, those who deny that there is a resurrection, came forward and put a question to Him.” (The Sadducees accepted as scripture only the first five books of the Old Testament. They rejected the oral legal traditions, opposed the resurrection of the dead, and opposed to teachings not found in the Pentateuch.)

Lk.21:15: “For I myself shall give you a wisdom in speaking that all your adversaries will be powerless to refute and overcome objections.” (You will be given a means of speaking, expression, and utterance to respond back. The Holy Spirit will provide (teach) you wisdom at that moment to refute your adversary [Lk.12:11-12]) 

Acts 13:45: “When the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and with violent abuse contradicted what Paul has said.”

The Jews were filled with jealousy and violent abuse because:

1. That the people would be open to hear the message that the Jews rejected.
2. That the people would accept Jesus as a humble, lowly, and despised Messiah.
3. That the Apostles were popular among the people.
4. That the Gentiles were to be viewed equal to the Jews for receiving the word of God.
5. Paul stated that it was necessary for the Jews to reject this message and condemn themselves.

Acts 28:22: “But we should like to hear you present your views, for we know that this sect is denounced everywhere.” (As a Jew, the Romans were interested in hearing Paul’s views. The new Christians were perceived as a sect (heresy) being in opposition to the Jews. The Christians often had to hide from the authorities for fear of reprisal or persecution.)

Rom.10:21: “But regarding Israel he says, ‘All day long I stretched out my hands to a disobedient and contentious people.”” (It was necessary that the word of God be spoken first to the Jews, but they rejected this message of salvation. The gospel had been sufficiently proclaimed to Israel, but willful and disobedience prevented this.)

Tit.1:9: “[A bishop as God’s steward] holding fasts to the true message as taught so that he will be able to exhort with sound doctrine and to refute opponents.” (Paul instructs Titus to appoint upright, blameless, just, holy, and self-controlled presbyters holding fast to sound doctrine. The presbyter is called to teach and encourage the faithful. The presbyter is also called to refute and to persuasively convince opponents and adversaries.)

[Greek] ἀντιλογία (antilogia)

Heb.12:3: “Consider how He endured such opposition from sinners, in order that you may not grow weary and lose heart.” (Jesus had to endure the cross [like a slave] before receiving the glory of His triumph. Jesus provides us encouragement as we undergo difficulties and struggles. Some are even called to share in His sufferings.)

Pope Leo’s curious statement: “The supreme rule in the Church is love.”

1. The supreme law of the Catholic Church is the SALVATION OF SOULS (as stated in Canon 1752 in the 1983 Code of Canon Law.
2. As a canon lawyer, it is VERY PERPLEXING that Pope Leo would not know this.
3. It seems that Pope Leo’s synodal mindset focuses more on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.
4. In this synodal Church, it is evident that there is NO FOCUS ON BRINGING SOULS INTO HEAVEN AND NO MENTION OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF SIN.
5. There is no emphasis on forgiveness, conversion of heart, and sin. There is NO MENTION of the Church’s teachings against homosexuality.
6. There is more focus tolerance, inclusion, false compassion, and “mercy above all else.“

Modernists’ antipathy and opposition against Tradition: (adapting to the world and culture):

1. Share decision making authority between clergy and laity. (Giving poorly catechized laity decision-making authority? What could ever possibly go wrong with this??)
2. Ignoring and diminishing the importance of Jesus’ command to sin no more (Jn.8:11): focusing on “mercy above all else”
3. Synodal path: remaking Jesus’ Church in a synodal Church (in the image of man and his lived experiences).
4. They are “keeping the door open on” women deacons: because women’s right’s have been disenfranchised and confusion of rights/vocations.
5. The Tradition Latin Mass (TLM) is now considered as divisive because it competes the Novus Order Mass (and new Church ecclesiology). Therefore, the TLM must go!
6. Cardinal Cupic believes that the Traditional Latin Mass impoverishes and creates a spectacle in the church?? He says this while the Novus Order Masses attendance is dwindling and churches are closing.
7. As the older progressive clergy continue to retire and die out, the Vatican seeks to push Synodality as an counterbalancing lay influence against when the younger traditional clergy will eventually lead the Church.

Conclusion:

Contradict, contradiction, negate, negation, antilog

Scandalon: This Greek noun means stumbling block, snare, and trap, which can lead to scandal.

Update: Jesus’ statements (commandments) to sin no more (Jn.8:11-12) has become a sign of contradiction (stumbling block) for the Synodal Church. Sin, forgiveness, and conversion of heart is never mentioned. More focus is being given to inclusion, tolerance, and false compassion.

Many clergy and laity in the Church now deny that homosexuality is any longer sinful. Many have ignored or have paid lip service to the Church teachings against homosexuality. As a result, many souls will be in eternal peril for this sinful activity at the judgment.

Many Modernist and Synodalist clergy are denying the laity’s desire and preference to celebrate the TLM. This has become a heated liturgical battle between traditionalists and progressives.

More and people are discovering that Pope Leo is following Pope Francis with Synodality. Pope Leo is being further criticized for actions and statements through all forms of media. It is becoming more difficult for pope-splainers to refute this.

Pope Pius X had prophesied that the heretical Modernists would take leadership in the Church. How are the Synodalists any different from the Modernists?

The traditional Transalpine Redemptorist monks claim that the TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC FAITH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE NEW SYNODAL CHURCH. These monks will most likely be perceived as sects by the Church for being “divisive”.

Traditional Catholics, continue to undergo difficulties and and struggles in being faithful and accepting toward the Synodal Church leadership who seek to change and remake the Church.

Confusion about vocations and rights: Pope Leo is open to women deacons. This Synodal mindset (what the people want) equates rights with vocations. Vocations and rights are NOT EQUAL.

Refuting German Synodal vitality: There were only 29 ordinations in Germany for 2024. This is a great warning sign for Synodality for the larger Church.

More synodal denying Church teachings against homosexuality : the Italian bishops promotes the inclusion and support of LGBTQ+ people who are “hurt” and are discriminated against [by Church teachings].

The Vatican’s strange war against its traditions: Progressives’ narrative connecting the TLM to extremism and impiety continues to fail as the younger people continue to attend the TLM. It remains to be seen whether or not Pope Leo will stop this division (in allowing the TLM)

Vatican II and Synodality’s false narrative: “The Church must get with the times” ===> a declining Church.  TRADITION AND TRADITIONAL TEACHINGS BRINGS FORTH TRUE REFORM AND RENEWAL.

“Each generation is converted by the saint who contradicts it most.” GK Chesterton

“False compassion, which is gradually growing in this country, is a pity that is shown not to the mugged but to the mugger, not the family of the murdered but to the murderer.” Archbishop Sheen

“The sin of this century is the loss of the sense of sin.” Pope Pius XII

[Greek] μάχομαι (machomai), [Latin] litigare, [French] disputer: to quarrel, to fight, to entangle, to wage war; Jn.6:52, Acts 7:26, 2Tim.2:4, Jas.4:2

The “No Kings Protest” has become more of a psychological projection of attributing one’s own feelings that Trump is a king and dictator.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to fight, to contend, to exert oneself, and to contend with.

Thucydides’ The Peloponnesian War 3.42: “The good citizen out to triumph not by frightening his opponents but by beating them fairly in argument; a wise city will not deprive them of their due. In this way successful orators would be least tempted to sacrifice their convictions for popularity and unsuccessful speakers resort to the same popular arts in order to win over the multitude.”

Plato’s Meno 86c: “This is a point for which I am determined to do battle, so far as I am able, both in word and deed.”

Aristophanes’ Knights 339 states “No, by Poseidon, we will fight first to see who speaks first.”

Old Testament: This term means to lay waste, to destroy, to fight, to struggle, and to wage war.

Lv.17:11: “Since the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement on the altar for yourselves, because it is the blood as life that makes atonement.” (The Jews were forbidden to drink the blood. This scripture will become a great point of contention for the Jews’ refusal to eat the Body and Blood of Jesus [in Jn.6:22-71])

Proverbs: This book warns about whom one associates with. Prov.23:1, Prov.4:14,17, Prov.23:6, Prov.9:5

New Testament: This term means to quarrel, to fight, to entangle, and to wage war.

Jn.6:52: “The Jews quarreled among the themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us [His] flesh to eat?'”

1. When Jesus starts with ‘Amen, amen, I say to you…’, Jesus will make an important statement.
2. Jesus then states, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you do not have any life within you.
3. Jesus is the bread that came down from heaven.
4. Already accustomed to the Jewish restrictions against drinking the blood (Lv.17:11), the disciples were having difficulty accepting Jesus’ hard sayings.
5. Jesus already knew that there would be many who would walk away.
6. Jesus did NOT say to the disciples, “Come back, I was only speaking figuratively.“
7. Jesus ask the Twelve, ‘Do you also want to leave?’
8. It was then that Jesus declared that Judas was to betray Him.

Acts 7:26: “The next day Moses appeared to them as they were fighting and tried to reconcile them peacefully, saying, ‘Men, you are brothers. Why are you harming one another?'” (Stephen refers back to when the Israelites who couldn’t understand that Moses was destined to deliver them out of Egypt. Stephen points out that the Israelites remain stiff-necked and disobedient to God’s plan of liberation for them. Stephen points out that others will be disobedient about the Messiah.)

[Greek] μάχη (machē)

2Tim.2:23: “Avoid foolish and ignorant debates, for you know they breed quarrels.”

1. These foolish and ignorant questions pertain to human vanity and human traditions from false teachers.
2. These quarrels and conflict may lead to conflict, division, strife, estrangement disobedience, contention, and bad doctrine [heresy].
3. One must impart the word of truth without deviation.
4. Otherwise, their idle and profane talk will spread like gangrene.

Jas.4:1: “Where do the wars and where do the conflicts among you come from?

Causes of division:

1. This comes from your passions that make war: carnal delights, worldliness, earthly riches, fame, worldly desires, sinful inclinations
2. You covet from others what you do not possess.
3. You ask wrongly. God promises to those who pray, not to those who fight. The petition of the lustful, murderous, and contention is not recognized by God.
4. You are spiritual adulterers as you bestow your favor on the world rather than with God. You forsake God for idols.
5. Being a lover of the world means enmity (hatred) toward God.
6. Submit yourselves to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

[Greek] διαμάχομαι (diamachomai)

Acts 23:9: “A great uproar occurred, and some scribes belonging to the Pharisee party stood up and sharply argued, ‘We find nothing wrong with this man. Suppose a spirit or angel has spoken to him?'”

1. Paul was arrested and brought before the Sanhedrin (Pharisees and Sadducees).
2. Paul states that he was on trial for hope of the resurrection of the dead.
3. A dispute broke out between the Pharisees and Sadducees pertaining the resurrection of the dead.
4. The Pharisees believed in the resurrection, angels, and spirits. The Sadducees did not believe in these three ideas.
5. Rather than discussing Paul’s fate, the Pharisees and Sadducees argued about these theological beliefs.
6. The Pharisees conflated (glossed over) Paul’s claims so that they would win a theological argument against the Sadducees.
7. Paul was eventually exonerated and the Roman commander took Paul into custody.
8. Jesus appeared to Paul, saying just as he bore witness to Him in Jerusalem, he must bear witness to Him in Rome.

Conflating/conflation: combining two or more separate things into one.

1. The Old Testament focuses on the consequences of associating with such evil activity.
2. The New Testament focuses on glossing over activity.
3. Conflation involves the combining of separate ideas (or views) in a composite.
4. These perceptions, sincerely held views, and assumptions may be conflated, resulting in mixed, ambiguous, or faulty views.
5. From the 1600’s conflation generally meant to bring something together from various sources.
6. From 1885 conflation take on an inadvertent (accidental) and confusing sense.
7. Projection: the treating of what is essentially subjective as objective and external. This is attributing one’s own ideas or feelings to another person or group.

Thoughts on the “No Kings Protests”:

1. Where were the young people? The vast majority of the crowds were older white people.
2. The crowds were made up of pro-Hamas supporters, pro-Antifa supporters, communists, Charlie Kirk haters, “Grantifa” (Antifa supporters disguised as grandmas).
3. When interviewed by reporters and journalists, they could not explain why Trump is a king or what rights have Trump have taken away from them.
4. The percentage of participating blacks (African-Americans) were very low in cities like Chicago and Atlanta.
5. Many of these protesters were projecting their hatred and animosity toward Trump as the rationale for these protests.
6. Parents are “teaching” their children to hate Trump.
7. Some have called others to kill ICE agents.

Conclusion:

Litigate, litigation, dispute

New Testament: The is the sad and tragic irony of many Jews refusing to accept Jesus. It was because of Jewish beliefs (Lv.17:11) that prevented Jews from drinking the blood. Therefore, the Jews could not accept drinking the Blood and eating the Body of Jesus. It is because of Jewish beliefs that were prevented them from attaining everlasting life from Jesus.

The Pharisees conflate Paul’s experience with their own views of the resurrection.

Update: This Catholic understanding of Jesus’ Body and Blood has been a big point of contention with other Christian churches and denominations. There are quite varying beliefs of what Communion is among different faiths.

Catholics and Christian continue to have disputes and differences pertaining to many issues. Conservatives and progressives (liberals) can also have differences in beliefs pertaining to issues.

There continues to be battles between traditionalist Catholics and liberal Catholics pertaining liturgical issues.

Why did Pope Leo and the majority of bishops did not protest the sacrilege of the LGBTQ Jubilee in Rome? Many remained silent. Silence presumes assent.

Unfortunately, the Synodal Church is too are gone in loving the world in focusing on MAKING A BETTER WORLD/SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.

Unfortunately, the Church leadership has made their efforts known through Synodality, remaking Jesus’ Church into a Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences.

Unfortunately, the Church acts more like a United Nations NGO than a divine institution.

It is instructive to recognize that Satan possesses great powers and influences in this world. Many people are often enticed by the delights of this world, worldliness, sin, earthly riches, fame, celebrity.

Satan also seeks to undermine God’s creation, God’s laws, God’s plans for marriage and procreation, morality, and Church laws and institutions.

Satan does not need to necessarily possess you. All he needs is to make you forget about God.

These protesting Democrats and Progressive often do not realize that the Biden administration used lawfare to incriminate Trump, persecute and arrested Catholics, and called upon the media to suppress content suppression.

In America, we already have a “No Kings Day”. It is July 4th.

“Someone may be of more help through prayer, but his silence will be exploited by others who’ll say, ‘So and so did not protests, therefore he is on our side, he agrees with us.’ If someone of us do not begin to strike back at evil, to reproach those who scandalize the faithful.” St. Paisios the Athonite        (We are already seeing this with bishops being silent about Church teachings.) 

[Greek] ἀπορέω (aporeō), [Latin] consternare, [Latin] haesitare, [French] debucher, [French] douter: puzzled, terrified, at a loss, without a way, perplexed; Lk.24:4, Jn.13:22, Mk.6:20, Acts 25:20, 2Cor.4:8, Gal.4:20

Pius X correctly prophesized that Satan would seek to undermine the Church (laity and clergy) because of their timidity, cowardice, lukewarmness, and worldliness. Vatican II’s and Synodality’s human traditions  have also contributed to this. There is no doubt about that!

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to be at a loss, to be in want, and to be in doubt.

Plato’s Laws 6.777c: “In view of all these facts, it is really a puzzle to know how to deal with all such matters.”

Polybius’ Histories 4.71: “Euripidas and the garrison were overpowered with by astonishment; because they had felt certain that the enemy would not venture and assault.”

Old Testament: This term means to be lacking, to fail, to frustrate, to impoverish, to be troubled, to be faint of heart.

New Testament: This term means to be terrified, to be at a loss, to hesitate, and to be perplexed.

Jn.13:22: “The disciples looked at one another, at a loss as to what He meant.” (Jesus stated that one of the disciples will betray Him. The disciples were perplexed and dumb-founded, not knowing whom or knowing what to say. Jesus’ statement ‘Amen, amen, I say to you’…indicates that He will say something very important [Judas betraying Jesus].)

Mk.6:20: Herod feared John, knowing him to be a righteous and holy man, and kept him in custody. When he heard him speak, he was very much perplexed, yet he liked to listen to him.” (While Herod feared John the Baptist, Herod was torn by his conflicting attitude toward John the Baptist. Such reasons include Herod’s admiration (respect), guilt, sinful lifestyle, and fear of divine judgment.)

2Cor.4:8: “We are afflicted in every way, but not constrained; perplexed, but not driven to despair.”

The Paradox of the Ministry:

1. We hold this treasure (divine power) in earthen vessels that have the surpassing power of God.
2. We are afflicted, but not constrained, perplexed but driven to despair.
3. We are persecuted but not abandoned, struck down but not destroyed.
4. We are always carrying about the dying of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may be manifested.
5. Although our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day.
6. This momentary light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all description.
7. We look not to what is seen (transitory) but to what is unseen eternal.

Gal.4:20: “I would like to be with you now and to change my tone, for I am perplexed because of you.” (Paul is fearful and perplexed that the Galatians are returning to paganism [idolatrous ways] and slavery to sin. Paul wished he could come back to them with a different voice of criticism, reproving, and censuring.)

[Greek] διαπορέω (diaporeō): be perplexed, be puzzled, be wondering about Lk 9:7; Ac 2:12; 5:24; 10:17+; Lk 24:4

Acts 2:12: “They were all astounded and bewildered and said to one another, ‘What does this mean?'”

1. There were devout Jews from every nation under heaven staying in Jerusalem.
2. They were confused because each one one heard them speaking in his own language.
3. This is in contrast to when the people who constructed the Tower of Babel where the Lord confused (made different) their language and scattered them all over the earth. (Gen.11:7)

Acts 10:17: “While Peter was in doubt about the meaning of the vision he had seen, the men sent by Cornelius asked for Simon’s house and arrived at the entrance.”

1. Peter saw the heaven opened up and a large sheet came down to the ground by its four corners.
2. In the sheet contained all the earth’s four legged animals, reptiles, and birds of the sky.
3. A voice said, “Get up, Peter. Slaughter and eat. What God has made clean, you are not to call profane.”
4. The men sent by Cornelius [to Peter’s house] confirmed the meaning of the vision for Peter.

Puzzlement over the battlefield of Church liturgy:

1. These tensions and divisions immediately followed after Traditionis Custodes.
2. The Mass has turned into a source of conflict between traditionalists and progressives.
3. Such quarrels risk profaning the Eucharist itself.
4. Those who attend the TLM should NOT be marginalized as they are the most devout practicing Catholics.
5. There are clear tensions between the clergy and laity concerning the TLM.
6. The Vatican faces increasing pressures to address the declining practice of the faith and deepening spiritual crisis.

Conclusion:

Consternation, hesitate, hesitation, doubt, doubting, debouche

Update: It is unfortunately not surprising that the Church bishops continue to focus on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. These have become their priorities.

This is perplexing: Pope Leo was shocked about the urination sacrilege, but has remained silent about the LGBTQ Jubilee. Why was he silent? Because it wasn’t a problem? Or was it because he did not want to offend and upset the LGBTQ community?

Bishop Eleganti: The “elephant in the room”: The Church can’t [and will not] address the sex abuse crisis until it confronts the homosexuality in the clergy. Many clergy perhaps refuse to want to end their homosexual lifestyles.

A puzzling yet predictable mindset from Vatican II: Wearing veils in Church is “outdated” because the Church needs to “get with the times”. So is showing reverence outdated???

Many people are still at a loss that the Church is still not focused on bringing souls into heaven. This presumes acknowledgment of sin, Jesus’ statement on sin, morality, and actually following Church teachings.

The heretic pro LGBTQ priest Fr. James Martin is often seen as a very charming person and a media darling.

The heretic pro LGBTQ Cardinal McElroy is seen as very eloquent in his writing. He is also known for his strong advocacy for immigration.

Paradox of the ministry #1: Bishop Strickland was canceled and deposed from office for upholding traditional Church teachings. He is now seen as a “white martyr”.

Paradox of the ministry #2: Pope Leo continues to make questionable liturgical appointments. Pope Leo also continues to remain silent about scandals. Silence equals assent.

Paradox of the ministry #3: The Church (clergy and laity) continue to ignore or pay lip service to Church teachings against homosexuality. This is leading many souls into eternal peril.

Paradox of the ministry #4: The Church leaders continue to invoke Traditionis Custodes to remove the TLM out of “unity”. The people’s desire for the TLM is being ignored.

Paradox of the ministry #5: Why is the Synodal Church seeking to clamp down on the highly attended TLM?  Is it because of their Modernist/Synodalist ideology and hard-heartedness?

Paradox of the ministry #5: Synodality continues to creates a Church that becomes MORE and MORE DIFFERENT from Jesus’ Church. The German Synodal Church is “reforming” and “renewing” itself into decline and heresy. This is a great warning sign for Synodality.

Paradox of the ministry #6: The many doubts of the Transalpine Redemptorists: “The traditional Catholic faith is incompatible with the new modern Church, the fruit of Vatican II.” (The Modernists’ and Synodalists’ human traditions ===> a Church more and more unrecognizable from Jesus’ Church.)*** It is just a matter of time before these monks get cancelled.***

“Do not doubt, do not hesitate, never despair of God’s mercy.” St. Isodore of Seville

“He who refuses to give into his passions does the same as he refuses to bow down and worship idols.” St. Theophan the Recluse

https://thecatholicherald.com/article/cardinal-sarah-warns-of-new-battlefield-over-church-liturgy

https://www.wmreview.org/p/transalpine-redemptorists-repudiate?publication_id=1202805&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=2y1qwu&utm_medium=email  ***

[Greek] χρηματίζω (chrēmatizō), [Latin] acceptare responsum, [Latin] admonere, [Latin] vocare, [Latin] consummare, [French] recevoir, [French] souvenir, [French] avertir, [French] inviter, [French] accomplir, [French] achever: to warn, to reveal, to call; Mt.2:12, Mt.2:22, Lk.2:26, Acts 10:22, Acts 11:26, Rom.7:3, Heb.8:5, Heb.11:7, Heb.12:25

It is quite astonishing how many of these Marian apparitions have come true about the Church. Lukewarm Catholics include bishops who do not act like bishops and laity who do not follow Church teachings.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to deliberate, to negotiate, to give a response to, to receive an answer to, and to call.

Old Testament: This term means to speak, to declare, to command, and to reveal. A deity becomes the answering authority.

New Testament: This means to warm (through a dream), to reveal (by the Holy Spirit), to be directed (by an angel), and to call out.

Mt.2:12: “And having warned in a dream not to return to Herod, they departed for their country by another way.” (This sets the stage for Israel’s rejection and the Gentiles’ acceptance of Jesus. God knows how to foil the purposes of the wicked and to deliver His own out of the hand of those who would destroy them.) 

Lk.2:26: “It had been revealed to Simeon by the Holy Spirit that he had seen the Messiah.” (Simeon was awaiting the consolation of Israel. Jesus’ birth brings to fulfillment the hopes and expectations of the restoration of God’s rule in Israel. Revelation comes from an answer to prayer.)

Acts 10:22: “They answered, ‘Cornelius, a centurion, an upright and God-fearing man, respected by the whole Jewish nation, was directed by a holy angel to summon you to his house and to hear what you have to say.'” (Peter is prepared to admit Gentiles, who were considered unclean, into the Christian community. Cornelius invited them in and showed them hospitality.)

Acts 11:26: “For a whole year they met with the Church and taught a large number of people, and it was in Antioch that the disciples were first called Christians.” (These Gentiles are now able to distinguish themselves from the Jews.)

1. Euodius, the first bishop of Antioch, is credited for being the first person to use the name Christian.
2. Ignatius, the second bishop of Antioch, frequently used this term.
3. The Gentiles are now able to distinguish themselves from the Jews.
4. When Paul was held prisoner by the Roman authorities, King Agrippa mockingly derived the term Christian Acts 26:28).

Rom.8:5: “For those who live according to the flesh are concerned with things of the flesh, but those who live according to the spirit with the things of the spirit.” (Things of the flesh pertain to sin, carnal desires, pleasures, riches, and worldliness.)***

Heb.11:7: “By faith Noah, warned about what was not yet seen, with reverence built an ark for the salvation of his household. Through this he condemned the world and inherited the righteousness that comes from faith.” (In faith Noah acts in response to God’s impending divine warning. Noah was obedient to God’s divine warning.)

Heb.12:25: “See that you do not reject the one who speaks. For if they did not escape when they refused the one who warned them on earth, how much more in our case if we turn away from the one who warns from heaven.” (The contrast here is between Moses and the Son of God. If the Israelites could not reject and escape from Moses, how much more difficult to reject and escape Christ, who comes from heaven.)

Marian prophesies:

Akita (1973): “The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops opposing bishops. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.”

1. Cardinals and bishops oppose each other on Church teachings against homosexuality, moral character (chastity) vs. homosexuality proclivities of the priesthood.
2. Modernist/Synodalist clergy continue to oppose the laity’s desire to celebrate the TLM.
3. The laity continues to criticize the clergy who offend or cause scandal. The laity continues to criticize the clergy’ silence in responding to scandal and sacrilege.
4. Compromising moral standards (toleration, inclusion, and false compassion): Church teachings are often ignored, disregarded, or watered down.
5. The papacies of Pope Francis and Pope Leo continued to be defined by doctrinal and liturgical confusion and ambiguity.

Our Lady of Good Success (1635): “The sacred sacrament of holy orders will be ridiculed, oppressed and despised. These corrupted priests, who will scandalize the Christian people, will incite the hatred of bad Christians, enemies. The apparent triumph of Satan will bring enormous sufferings to the good pastors of the Church.”

1. Faithful traditional (conservative) are sometimes criticized, censured, deposed, and laicized for upholding traditional Church teachings because they are “divisive“.
2. Clergy often cause liturgical scandals at Masses, Vatican events, and pilgrimages.
3. There are too many clergy (cardinals, bishops, and priests) who promote LGBQT “outreach” with disregards or pays lip service to Church teachings against homosexuality.
4. There are too many clergy who engage in the homosexual lifestyle. This is more notable in the liberal and more progressive older generations of priests
5. Too many clergy are being influenced by Satan’s efforts to undermine Church teaching, structure, doctrine, Church attendance, and vocations.
6. In contrast, the younger priests and seminarians are become conservative and traditionally minded. They favor the TLM.
7. The Church sex abuse scandal was greatly influenced by the clergy’s homosexual proclivities and devaluation of celibacy.

Our Lady of Good Success (1635): “The clergy will become careless in their sacred duties, will stray from the road traced by God for their priestly ministry. They will become attached to wealth and riches, which they will duly strive to obtain.”

1. Some priests will lead hugely successful media organizations and companies.
2. The Vatican and USCCB often act like more of an NGO than a divine institution in the world.
3. The USCCB, NGO’s, Catholic charities, and USAID have become involved in dubious business and financial relationships. Such areas involve immigration, illegal immigration, and child trafficking.
4. The Vatican and USCCB continue to be entrenched in politics, social justice, and immigration. The continue to focus on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.
5. The Vatican and USCCB continue disregard any efforts to bring souls into heaven. This presumes recognition and acknowledgment of sin.

Fatima (1917): “There will be a wicked council planned and prepared that will change the countenance of the Church. Many will lose the faith. Confusion will reign everywhere. The sheep will search for the shepherds in vain. A schism will tear apart the holy tunic of My Son. The Church will bleed from Her wounds.”

“More souls go to hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason.” ***

1. Pope John XXIII naively believed that it was necessary to “bring in fresh air (worldliness) so that the Church can get with the times.”
2. Pope Paul VI later stated that the “smoke of Satan” (confusion and upheaval against the Church) has entered into the Church.
3. Synodality explicitly seeks to continue what Vatican started: to make a worldly Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences. (CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHURCH)
4. Since Vatican II has lead to a pastoral and spiritual disaster for the Church: lack of Church attendance, loss of vocation, liturgical sacrilege, sex abuse scandal, and disobedience of the bishops.
5. Pope Francis and Pope Leo continue to sow the seeds of doctrinal and liturgical confusion (ambiguity).
6. The German Synodal Church is “renewing” and “reforming” itself into heresy and decline. (CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHURCH)
7. There continues to be a schism between traditional (conservative) Catholics and Modernists (Synodalists).
8. Synodality introduces toleration, inclusion, and rejection of Church teachings. Synodality (lived experiences) take precedence over Church teachings. Synodality becomes and IDOL!
9. Synodality is introducing shared decision making authority between clergy and laity in order to become a “listening Church”, redefining vocations, decentralized authority, becoming more like a Protestant Church. (CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF THE CHURCH)
10. The Vatican and Synodality continue to focus primarily on Making A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. Bringing souls into heaven has become a less important priority.

Garabandal (1965): “Many cardinals, many bishops, and many priests are on the road to perdition and are taking many souls with them.” (Not officially approved by the Church, but this prophecy still self-incriminates the Vatican)

1. The Vatican issued Fiducia Supplicans, a document that allows “blessings” for same-sex unions. Some have said that the Church has reached its “millstone moment.“
2. The Church is disregarding the grave sin of homosexuality. Many clergy and laity are putting eternal souls in mortal peril at their judgment.
3. Many clergy unfortunately are engaged in the homosexual lifestyle. This also has contributed to the Church’s sexual abuse crisis.
4. Kyle Clement, assistant to exorcist priest Fr. Rippenger, warns that blessing same sex unions flings the door open to the demonic.

Update: “Millstone moment”: The Church is permitting a blessing for a sin so terrible that it would preferable to drown with a millstone around one’s neck than engage in this sin.

***You will know them by their fruits (priorities): The Church continues every opportunity to MAKE A BETTER WORLD and to SEEK FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. The Church is doubling down on its efforts to promote immigration (and illegal immigration).

The Vatican and Pope Leo continue to permit and allow confusion and schism through his inaction and silent assent.

More and more Church are restricting the TLM through Traditionis Custodes. This is being done under the guise of “unity“. Yet, Pope Leo remains silent in the background. 

When local bishops continue to permit sacrileges, Pope Leo remains quiet. One questions whether if Pope Leo will lead by example and tell other bishops to show integrity and fidelity to Church teachings.

Pope John XIII and the “prophets of doom”: Pope John stated that the “prophets of doom” were those critics who believed that the modern world and the Church were in a state of inevitable deterioration, decay, and pessimism. Those “prophets of doom” [illustrating the warnings of Faitma] were right!

It is not surprising that the Church did not approve Garabandal message. Approving this message would have meant self-incriminating the Vatican.

“Homosexuality is incompatible with the priestly vocation.” Pope Benedict XVI

“Sometimes people are interested in social justice to cover up the want of individual justice.” Archbishop Sheen

“The refusal to take side on great moral issues is itself a decision. It is silent acquiescence to evil.” Archbishop Sheen

“The devil does everything to overcome souls consecrated to God, because in this way, the devil will succeed in leaving souls of the faithful abandoned by their leader.” Sr. Lucia

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fr-heimerl-francis-synodal-church-is-controlled-by-old-homosexual-men/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/blessing-homosexual-couples-flings-the-door-open-to-the-demonic-exorcists-assistant-warns/

[Greek] λανθάνω (lanthanō), [Latin] latere, [French] cacher: to escape notice, to be hidden, to be ignorant of, to forget; Mk.7:24, Lk.8:47, Acts 26:26, Heb.13:2, 2Pet.3:5,8

It has not escaped notice that many saw this event as a foolish pagan environmental ritual. One CANNOT be surprised when the Vatican (and Synodal Church) are so much focused on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to go unnoticed, to be blind, to escape (notice), to remain hidden, to be deceived, to forget, and to be unaware:

Escaping notice: This expression essentially means to go unnoticed, to avoid being seen, and failing to respond to something.

Aristophanes’ Knights 465: “His tricks at Argos do not escape me.”

Homer’s Odyssey 19.151: “Thus for three years I kept the Achaeans from knowing and beguiled them.”

Euripides’ Alcestis 198: “But since he has escaped death, he lives with such grief as he will never forget.”

Aeschylus’ Agamemnon 796: “But whoever is a discerning shepherd of his flock cannot be deceived by men’s eyes which fawn affection.”

Aristophanes’ Wasps 517: “You are their slave and do not know it.”

Old Testament: This term means to hide, to conceal, to destroy, to act covertly, to act treacherously, to find lacking, and to help. Interestingly, showing hospitality to strangers (Heb.13:2) is related to Abraham and Sarah showing hospitality to three visitors (Gen.18). Because of their hospitality toward the strangers, the visitors proclaimed that Abraham and Sarah will have a son. They received a blessing for their kindness to others.

New Testament: This term means to escape notice, to forget, to neglect, and to not know.

Lk.8:47: “When the hemorrhagic woman realized she had not escaped notice, she came forward trembling. Falling down before Him, she explained in the presence of all the people why she had touched Him and how she had been healed immediately.” (The hemorrhagic woman approached Jesus and touched His tassel. She was immediately healed because she had faith that she would be healed by Him. Jesus mentioned that power had gone out of Him.)

Acts 26:26: “The king knows about these matters and to him I speak boldly, for I cannot believe that any of this has escaped his notice; this was not done in a corner.” (The phrase ‘not done in a corner’ is a Greek proverb meaning that it is already known. Paul is presenting a story about Jesus and the Church that is already well known. Luke provides certainty in relating that the entire history of Christianity is public knowledge and incontestable.)

Heb.13:2: “Do not neglect hospitality, for through it some have unknowingly entertained angels.” (The Hebrew Christians are called to offer hospitality to their Christian brother and strangers. Angels could be men or special visitors from God.)

2Pet.3:8: “But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years and a thousand years like one day.” (The delay of the Lord’s coming is not a failure to fulfill His word but rather a sign of His patience. God is giving time for repentance before the judgment. Likewise, as in life, it quite often seems that God works much to slow for us for our liking.)

[Greek] ἐπιλανθάνομαι (epilanthanomai), [Latin] obliviscere: to forget, to neglect, to overlook

Mt.16:5: “In coming to the other side of the sea, the disciples had forgotten to bring bread.”

The leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees:

1. Jesus warns the disciples to beware of the rebellious and corrupting Pharisees’ and Sadducees’ leaven (teaching).
2. The disciples thought the Jesus was referring to actual bread.
3. Jesus criticized the disciples for their lack of faith.
4. Jesus stated that the disciples’ hearts were hardened, having eyes but not seeing, and having ears but not hearing.
5. Jesus warns the disciples’ human traditions, worldliness, corrupt teachings, hypocrisy, unbelief, and lived experiences.

Lk.12:6: “Are not five sparrows sold for two small coins? Yet not one of them has escaped the notice of God.”

Courage under persecution:

1. There is nothing concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known.
2. Whatever you have said in the darkness will be heard in the light.
3. Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but after that can do no more.
4. Be afraid of the one who after killing has the power to cast into Gahenna.
5. To God, you are worth more important than many sparrows.
6. Everyone who acknowledges Me before others, the Son of Man will acknowledge before the angels of God.
7. Everyone who denies Me before others will be denied before the angels of God.

Jas.1:24: “He sees himself, then goes off and promptly forgets what he looked like.”

Doers and hearers of the Word:

1. Be doers of the word and not hearers of the word, only deluding yourselves.
2. A hearer of the word is like a man who looks at his own face in a mirror. He sees himself, then goes off and promptly forgets what he looks like.
3. A doer of the word is one who peers into the perfect law of freedom and perseveres.
4. A doer of the word is one who shall be blessed in what he does.

Beware of the leaven of the Modernists and Synodalists:

1. Unfortunately, the Synodal Church continues to focus on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD. This is Not done in a corner.
2. At every opportunity, the Synodal Church continues to illustrates these priorities. Now doubling down on immigration against President Trump.
3. Bringing souls into heaven: This has NOT become a great priority for the Church. This presumes recognition of sin
4. Becomes hearers of the Word: This Synodal Church continues to bestow inclusion and tolerance instead of stating sin. They DO NOT SEE that homosexuality is sinful.
5. Becoming hearers of the Word: This Synodal Church DOES NOT FOLLOW AND HEAR Jesus’ command, “Go and sin no more!” (Jn.8:11).

Pascendi Dominici Gregis (“Feeding the Lord’s Flock”): Pope St. Pius’ encyclical, promulgated on Sept 8, 1907, exposes the tactics used by Modernists to spread their errors in the Church.

Modernists seek to:

1. Hide (escape notice) in the Church: staying within the Church, acting like wolves in sheep’s clothing, using mischievous and subtle ways to change Church doctrine and teachings
2. Attack, redefine, and ignore Church teachings
3. Manipulate (change) public opinion about Church teachings
4. Synodalists remake Jesus’ Church into a Church made into the image of man and his lived experiences.
5. Synodalists elevate lived experiences over Church teachings. Making Synodality as an IDOL.
6. Synodalists create a “listening Church” where clergy and laity share decision making authority to determine doctrine. SOUNDS LIKE MAKING THE CHURCH MORE PROTESTANT!

Immigration:

1. Offering hospitality: We should be offering hospitality (comfort) for the poor and destitute in our IMMEDIATE spheres of influence.
2. Inverted priorities: We cannot escape notice that the Church has now redoubled its efforts to focus on immigrants (illegal immigrants) at this time.
3. We cannot escape notice that the Democrats are going to “politically die on the hill” for supporting funds for illegals.
4. Many also forget that Catholic social teaching also advocates that immigrants (foreigners) must also respect countries’ borders.
5. It has not escape notice that Pope Leo has ordered the American bishops to double down on opposing President Trump on immigration.

Aristophanes: Even secular Greek philosophy can illustrate that slavery to sin and addiction

Aristophanes: Actions, antics, and tricks can often be calling cards or red flags for one’s behavior. We only need to look at sanctuary cities such as Chicago and Portland.

Old Testament: Gen. 18: clearly illustrates the importance of providing hospitality to strangers. Yet, this should be done in appropriate and proper ways.

Conclusion:

Oblivion, oblivious, latent, cache

Update: It has not escaped notice that the meme can be mightier than the sword or the pen. ☺☺☺

Because of continued tolerance and inclusion for the LGBTQ, the Vatican, Pope Leo and the USCCB still remain quiet about the criticism against the Vatican LGBTQ Jubilee.

It seems that Pope Leo’s papacy is continuing to neglect of liturgical law and tradition, paving the way for widespread confusion about faith and morals. 

What was missing from the blessing of the ice? THERE WAS NO MENTION OF THE  GOSPEL.

It has not escaped notice that Gov. Pritzker and Mayor John are saying to the federal authorities, “Leave our crime alone!

The Oregon and Portland authorities seem to be saying, “What crime?”

It is quite evident that Pope Francis and Pope Leo both neglect the Church historical tradition that capital punishment can sometimes be permitted.

One cannot escape notice that Democrat Abigail Spanberger is a cold and calculating candidate who refuses to answer moral questions. 

Many of us can all relate to thinking of ourselves as being unworthy or being an outcast in approaching the Lord. Let’s not forget that the Lord welcomes all of us at Eucharistic adoration.

Many of us can all relate to thinking that God “annoying acts too slowly” in helping us or answering our prayers. God seemingly works very slowly in His Providence.

It is during times of great disbelief (lack of faith) that Eucharistic miracles may occur to strengthen our faith of the people.

Questionable ecumenism going too far: The Vatican is allowing a Moslem prayer run in the Vatican library. Islam is incompatible with Catholicism and Christianity.

Our actions will not escape the notice of God. At the end of the day, God will “reward” those who persevere through these difficulties. God will also “reward” those scandalous clergy who fail to act as priests. God will not be mocked!

“All sin comes from forgetfulness of God.” St. Gregory of Nazianzus

“Don’t neglect your spiritual reading. Reading has made many saints.” Josemaria Escriva

“There is nothing unpremeditated, nothing neglected by God. His unsleeping eye beholds all things.”

“Not to oppose error is to approve it, and not to defend truth is to suppress it. and indeed to neglect to confound evil men, when we can do it, is no less a sin to encourage them.”  Pope St. Felix III

https://www.ncregister.com/news/pentin-cardinal-burke-tlm-doctrinal-moral-corruption

[Greek] ἴσος (isos), [Latin] par, [Latin] aequalis, [French] egal: equal, agree, same, equally; Mt.20:12, Mk.14:56,59, Lk.6:34, Jn.5:18, Acts 11:17, Php.2:6

The human “seamless garment” doctrine seeks to relativize (make equal) situational morality and to undermine Church teachings.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term refers to equality in size, number, value, or force. This term does not take on a qualitative sense.

Homer’s Iliad 1.187: “So that you will understand how much mightier I am [quantity] than you, and another my shrink from declaring himself my equal [equality] and likening himself to me to my face.”

Herodotus’ The Histories 1.2: “The Greeks replied that, as they had been refused reparation for the abduction of the Argive Io, they would not take any to the Colchians.”

Old Testament: This term refers to equal parts.

Deut.17:6: “Only on the testimony of two or three witnesses shall a person be put to death; no one shall be put to death on the testimony of one witness.”

1. If someone is told or has heard of this, this matter must be seriously investigated.
2. If the truth of the matter is established, you shall bring this person out to your gates.
3. Only on the testimony of two or three witnessed shall a person be put to death.
4. No one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness.

New Testament: This term means equal, agree, same, and equality.

Mt.20:12: “These last ones worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us, who bore the day’s burden and the heat.” (This speaks more of divine merit and justice for the person. Each person is viewed with equal generosity. This is in contrast with human justice and envy which demands that others should deserve less.)

Mk.14:56: “Many gave false witness against Him, but their testimony did not agree.”

1. The chief priests and entire Sanhedrin kept trying to obtain testimony to put Him to death, but their testimony did not agree.
2. Some claimed that Jesus will ‘destroy this temple made with human hands and within three days build another not made with hands’.
3. Jesus responds by saying that He was the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One.
4. The high priest then condemned Jesus with blasphemy.

Jn.5:18: “For this reason the Jews tried all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the sabbath but He also called God His own father, making Himself equal to God.” (Jesus meant for the Jews to understand what He had said. Jesus meant to irritate and to enrage the Jews.)

Acts 11:17: “If then God gave them the same gift He gave to us when we came to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to be able to hinder God?” (The Jewish Christians were antagonistic toward Gentiles coming into the Christian community. The Holy Spirit tells Peter to welcome the Gentiles. When the Jerusalem community sent Barnabas to investigate, Barnabas, favorably impressed, invited Saul to participate in the Antioch mission.)

Php.2:6: “Jesus Christ, who though He was in the form of God, did not regard quality with God something to be grasped.” (Christ is in the form of God. God condescends (humbles) Himself in a human figure as Christ.)

In past years, it was taken for granted that this was to be accepted. But unfortunately, it seems that this practice has become outdated.

Relativizing doctrine and situational morality:

1. Vital immanence: the explanation for religion/doctrine/morality comes from one’s own perceptions and sentiments.
2. Objective morality: what is considered morally right and wrong often becomes blurred, ignored, or rejected.
3. Religious Indifferentism: the belief that differences of religious belief are of no importance. Religions are all the same.
4. Synodality: lived experiences often defines one’s belief system. Church teachings can be rejected or ignored. Paying lip service to Church teachings.
5. The older generations of clergy from Vatican II and Syodality have more liberal, and progressive beliefs and attitudes. Many of these clergy also engage in the homosexual lifestyle.
6. Seamless garment doctrine: being pro-life takes on the same moral gravity of respect for immigrants. Supporting abortion takes on the same moral gravity of being disrespectful of immigrants.

Synodality:

1. Synodality (lived experiences): This means that lived experiences can often take precedence over Church teachings.
2. Vatican LGBTQ “outreach”: This equals inclusion and tolerance for the homosexual lifestyle. This means paying lip service to Church teachings against homosexuality.
3. Becoming a “listening Church“: This means laity sharing decision-making authority to define doctrine and moral beliefs. This means a Church made in the image of man and his lived experiences. What could possibly go wrong with this??
4. Synod of Synodalities: the synod group on sexual morality recommends that personal experiences and situational ethics should take precedence over objective norms established by God.
5. The “Holy Spirit of surprises”: This means that Synodal leaders can use the Holy Spirit to rationalize anything they want. This is dangerous in that the Holy Spirit can only stand for TRUTH.
6. Synodality in every diocese: This means laity voting to establish their own doctrine and creating one’s own Protestant Church (while also undermining the Catholic Church.)
7. Inviting non-Catholics to the Synod of Synodalities: This means Synod coordinators asking non-Catholics, “What can we do to make the Church less Catholic for you?”

Jesus’ Church is NOT equal with the Synodal Church:

1. Jesus’ Church: Jesus walked with sinners but He did NOT tolerate their sinful lifestyle. He said, ‘From now on do not sin any more.’ (Jn.8:11). Jesus also said, ‘Whoever follows Me [by not sinning] will NOT walk in darkness, but will have the light of life (Jn.8:12).
2. Synodal Church: Walking [in darkness according to Jesus] means having inclusion and tolerance for sinful behavior and lifestyles. Listening means having clergy and laity decide together which doctrine and teachings to follow. Synodality means lived experiences can take precedence over Church teachings. Synodality becomes an IDOL.

Conclusion:

Isosceles [triangle], par, equal, equality, egalitarian

Update: Fighting back with equal measure: Instead of seeking direction from on high ecclesial functionaries, traditional Catholics should convey their concerns and exert their pressure at the local issue. This could include asking for altar kneelers, Eucharistic adoration, no “extraordinary eucharistic ministers, and more reverence.

It is unfortunate that Pope Leo also supports the human “seamless garment” doctrine. This is evidenced by his tacit support for Cardinal Cupich honoring Senator Dick Durbin. Thankfully, this was later cancelled.

DEI: equality of outcome. This is how you dumb down standards so that everyone becomes equal. This is the Marxist theory of equality.

Zohran Mamdani just announced that he will eliminate the gifted student program in New York public schools. This is a common move to achieve equity through mediocrity.

Inclusion and tolerance going too far: The USCCB just released and approved a “LGBTQ friendly” NRSV bible, which seeks to whitewash sinful activity (removing the term sodomy/sodomite). What is next? Whitewashing the sin of homosexuality?

As with equal divine mercy toward each of us, God will employ equal divine judgment against us, according to our station in life. God may be equally harsh in judgement against clergy who refuse or ignore sin.

Many clergy who will welcome the LGBTQ community in the Church will also DISMISS or IGNORE the Church’s teachings against homosexuality.

Pope Leo’s absence from and silence about the LGBTQ Jubilee speaks volumes about his assent for this event. Pope Leo did NOT stop this event.

Nichols warmly welcomes and accepts the new Archbishop of Canterbury. Cardinal Nichols, part of the older liberal and progressive generations of Vatican II clergy, evidently has no problem with a WOMAN BISHIOP who supports abortion. Shocker! This is religious indifferentism at its worst.

What is NOT the same: the older generation of clergy are liberal and progressive in their beliefs. The younger generations of priests and seminarians are more conservative and traditionally minded.

“The idea that all religions are equal is a diabolical lie. Only the Catholic Church possesses the fullness of the means of salvation.” Cardinal Sarah

“All the good works in the world are equal to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass because they are the works of man. But the Mass is the work of God. St. John Vianney

“Christ is not valued at all, unless He is values above all.” St. Augustine

[Greek] ἐπιστρέφω (epistrephō), [Latin] revertere, [Latin] convertere, [Latin] redire, [French] tourner, [French] se changer, [French] renverser, [French] retourner: to revert, to turn, to turn around, to return, to convert, to turn about; 44 scriptural references

Rather than focusing on recognizing sin and bringing souls into heaven, this Synodal Church focuses on MAKING A BETTER WORLD and SEEKING FAVOR WITH THE WORLD.

Background information:

Greek Hellenism: This term means to turn back, to turn about, to turn round, to put an enemy to flight, to put about, to recur, to pay attention to, to bring into action, to convert, to correct, to return, to go back and forth, to turn against, to wheel about, and to repent.

Herodotus’ Histories 2.103.2: “From there he turned around and went back home.”

Xenophon’s Hellenica 6.4.9: “It was already evident that there would be a battle. Some baggage carriers as such did not wish to fight (turn back) and had withdrawn.”

Sophocles’ Antigone 1111: “But since my judgment has taken this turn, I will be there to set her free.”

Sophocles’ Philoctetes 599: “The Atreides after so long a time turn their thoughts toward this man.”

Euripides Heracleidae 942: “Come, first turn your head towards me and steel yourself to look you enemies in the face; you are ruled, no longer the ruler.”

Old Testament: This term means to turn, to change, to restore, to do again, to repel, to change behavior, to return, to apostatize, and to give back.

New Testament: This term means to turn around, to return, to convert, to turn away, to make a turn, and to bring back. For purposes of brevity, mundane physical turning will be excluded.

To return:

Mt.10:13: “If the house is worthy, let your peace come upon it; if not, let your peace return to you.” (This means that your peace shall not come upon it. You are not bestowing a gift to them. If people were willing to receive this, they would receive a benefit or blessing.)

Mt.9:22: “Jesus turned around and saw her, and said, ‘Courage, daughter! Your faith has saved you.’ And from that the woman was cured.” (As the hemorrhagic woman touched Jesus’ cloak, she said that she would be healed. Jesus said that her faith had saved her.)

Mk.8:33: “At this, He turned around and, looking at His disciples, rebuked Peter and said, “Get behind Me, Satan. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.”

Peter’ confession about Jesus:

1. Jesus tells the disciples that the Son of Man must suffer greatly, be rejected, be killed, and rise after three days.
2. Peter took Jesus aside and rebuked Him.
3. At first glance, this sounds like a reasonable reaction from Peter. Peter was concerned about Jesus’ welfare.
4. Jesus rebuked Peter and said, “Get behind Me, Satan. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.
5. However, in Peter’s seemingly “reasonable response”, Peter was briefly Satanically inspired to UNDERMINE Jesus’ mission to redeem humanity.
6. Satan seeks to undermine God, God’s creation, God’s laws, and His Church.